CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Quick question

Quick question

Started by casualsailor6 · · 👁 5 views · 10 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants casualsailor6fadedsailor932rustydrifter10Sophia Thomas7
casualsailor6 casualsailor6 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jun 2012
#1 ·
So, I’ve actually been part of this community for quite a while now, even though I’m using a new handle.
I had a previous account that was permanently banned about two years ago, back when I was still figuring out how everything worked here. It was honestly just a mistake on my part regarding how to start a thread.

I truly don't understand how a permanent ban could be handed out just because I didn't know the proper way to format a post.

For instance, there is another user who constantly posts completely nonsensical threads on the EPA every few days, yet isn't banned—certainly not permanently.

I would sincerely appreciate a specific explanation regarding this decision!
fadedsailor932 fadedsailor932 Active Member
101 messages
joined Oct 2004
#2 ·
Honestly, it sounds kind of sketchy that you got banned just for opening a thread the wrong way. 🤷

Since you already admitted you're a clone of someone who was permanently banned, why not just drop the old username? Let's see if that person actually deserved the ban or not.
casualsailor6 casualsailor6 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jun 2012
#3 ·
Nevermatttermind.
casualsailor6 casualsailor6 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jun 2012
#4 ·
So, what’s the verdict?
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#5 ·
My search isn't pulling up that profile for some reason. Could you shoot me the link, please?
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#6 ·
casualsailor6 said:

Thanks! I actually dug up the appeal over at the FEC, but they didn't really give a straight answer there. So, I went ahead and checked out Waste Management and ended up finding that old thread where you deleted the original post. Technically, you could argue that counts as breaking the rules, but since I can't see what was written before the edits, I'm honestly not sure if there's some other reason behind the ban besides that.

Here's the link for the admin staff.
casualsailor6 casualsailor6 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jun 2012
#7 ·
rustydrifter10 said:Thanks. I looked for an appeal through the FEC, but there wasn't any clear explanation provided. I ended up searching Waste Management and found an old thread where you deleted the original post. Technically, that could be seen as breaking the rules, but since I can't see what was written before the edits, I'm not sure if there was some other reason for the ban besides that.

Here is the link for the admin staff.

I started the thread totally normally.
But then I had second thoughts and tried to wipe all the text—basically trying to delete the whole topic. To this day, I honestly still don't know if that's even allowed.

It was that "undo" thing when posting a thread. 🤷
The whole topic was just about some silly relationship drama I was dealing with.

Back then, the moderator just told me that I knew why it happened.
Anyway, the reason I'm bringing this up is because Cindy is constantly popping up with ridiculous threads over at the EPA and hasn't been banned, let alone permanently.

By the way, that was my very first username on this forum. And I truly had no idea what she meant when she wrote that I knew why.

At the time, I just shrugged my shoulders and let it go.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#8 ·
casualsailor6 said:I posted about Temu just like anyone else would.
But then I had second thoughts and tried to wipe the whole thing—you know, delete the entire thread. To this day, I honestly still can't figure out if there's even a way to actually do that.

The thing is, users here don't have the option to delete their own threads once they're live. That’s why you really have to sleep on it before hitting that "post" button. 🙂

If that's truly the only reason behind the rules, I honestly feel like they could handle it in a much less heavy-handed way.

casualsailor6 said:Anyway, the main reason I'm bringing this up is because that user Cindy is constantly cluttering up the EPA boards with these totally mindless threads, and she hasn't even been given a temporary ban, let alone a permanent one.

Thanks for pointing that out; I'll definitely look into what's going on there.
casualsailor6 casualsailor6 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jun 2012
#9 ·
rustydrifter10 said:Users don't have the ability to delete their own threads. That's why you really need to think twice before hitting that post button. 🙂

Well, at least that mystery is finally cleared up. 😁

rustydrifter10 said:If that's truly the only reason, I feel like there could have been a less heavy-handed way to handle it.

It felt a little extreme to me too, but I suppose it is what it is.

Thanks for the input.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#10 ·
casualsailor6 said:Basically, I'm asking because Cindy keeps clogging up the EPA forums with these mindless threads and hasn't been banned—let alone permanently.

I’ve no clue who banned you before or what the deal was, but we have a "new" mod team now, which means the whole way the EPA is moderated has changed.

Generally speaking, the logic of "why was I banned before when someone else can post stupid stuff and stay active" is a bit shaky, but regardless, Cindy actually got a warning from Ares during that last ridiculous thread, noting that the next time it happens, they're getting hit with a direct sanction.
casualsailor6 casualsailor6 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Jun 2012
#11 ·
Matthew Anderson said:I have no idea who banned you previously or what the reasoning was, but we have a brand-new moderation team now, which means the way this forum is managed has changed completely.

Generally speaking, arguing "why was I banned before while someone else can post stupid threads without consequences" is a weak angle, but regardless, Sinnnke just received a warning from Apophis on that last ridiculous thread, noting that the next slip-up will result in an immediate ban.

Is that supposed to be some kind of clever comeback?

He's just one example.
Like I mentioned earlier, it really just got me thinking, you know?
Two years ago, I never got an answer, but now I finally have, so everything is fine.

Back then, a tiny mistake led to a permanent ban, which left me pretty shaken up, so I just wanted some clarity on it.

The main thing is that the moderation team is actually improving. lol

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads