Kyle Ross19 said:What exactly are you trying to prove with all this Cold War rhetoric? Which damn allies are we even talking about during a (relatively) peaceful period!?
And get this—an Israeli ally, like the AU, basically means supporting Zionist violence and the occupation of the Palestinians and Palestine? Think about it.
If you ask the average citizen, you'll get an answer just like a local journalist would: they conduct a street poll regarding support for Bush (both then and under Howard) for the war in Iraq, and out of 200 people surveyed, they find only 6 (six) Bush sympathizers (haha, both his and Howard's). Everyone else made their stance crystal clear against that criminal occupation.
Just because a leader is clueless, acting erratically, and doing whatever foreign powers tell him to do doesn't mean the masses actually support him. In fact, every poll for months now has suggested that people have had quite enough of him. If he had conducted foreign policy in the interest of the US national interest instead of catering to some globalist types, his approval ratings among his own citizens would surely be higher.
The Israeli attack on the rocket base in Syria was carried out and, naturally, demands a response. Currently, this is a Syrian note/demand sent to the UN Security Council.
I wouldn't rule out a more concrete Syrian response to the Zionist military via ballistic measures. At the end of the day, let the music play.
My apologies. I was using the same terminology used by Arabs themselves (we can just look at their news coverage here), who refer to the USA, the UK, Australia, and their allies during these "relatively" peaceful times. Even Australian politicians use that exact phrasing. So, I suggest you write them a polite letter and maybe they'll correct it for you.👍
As for changing public opinion, he is against the war (much like the civilians in Iraq, there was even a poll for that), but that doesn't change the fact that Australia is an ally to America.👎