I'm looking for some private practice recommendations in New York City: - Cardiologist - Endocrinologist They don't necessarily need to be at the same clinic. 🙂
Is it theoretically possible to engineer a tooth so precisely that we can ditch the drill for final adjustments? I’m talking about high-level precision—maybe using a laser to shave down edges if they come out a bit too high. I realize using a traditional drill is currently the easier, more precise route, but I'm wondering: can we move past it entirely?
It’s not as simple as just passing through. That’s the whole issue—it doesn't all just exit the body safely; it breaches the intestinal barrier and moves deeper into the system. We aren't talking about swallowing a chunk of plastic and just pooping it out. Besides, I don't quite follow your logic: if you aren't even drinking bottled water, why is this weighing on you? If we follow that line of reasoning, we might as well conclude that Green Party plastics and microparticles are present in every single piece of plastic packaging ever made, it's just easier to isolate them in water due to the specific dye used in the tests. Correct me if I'm wrong, though.
A voided transaction is just a standard receipt with its own unique number; the only difference is the amount shows up as a negative. And yes, those voids still need to be reported through the fiscal system. After that, you just go right back to processing regular invoices as usual.
Sandra Bailey6 said:This might be a silly question, but I still haven't figured out if a primary care physician can issue a referral—say, for blood work—based on symptoms alone, without me actually showing up in person? I'm wondering if it works like prescriptions now, where you just show up at the lab instead of having to physically pick up a paper slip.
I’d assume they could, but I’d really like some confirmation before I waste my time calling.
Real-life situation: I'm currently in a different city and need some relatively urgent testing done.
[P.S. I'm not a hypochondriac 😁 quite the opposite, actually; I haven't seen a doctor in years.]
Depending on what you're feeling, it might actually be worth heading to the ER...
The answer is yes—each shop maintains its own numbering sequence. However, you could potentially link the second one to Elvis Presley via an API so that all your invoices, whether cash or transaction-based, flow through a single point. You'll just need to hire a developer to handle that integration for you.
I hear you, but I think you’re off base here. You might want to double-check which sequence number is actually being offered next. If you’ve been messing around with manual overrides... well, look, the invoice number should always be the very next one in line, regardless of whether the previous entry was a finalized sale or just a transaction.
Account numbering isn't some arbitrary choice you get to make; it's mandated by federal law. The sequence follows a specific structure: business location ID followed by the operator/terminal ID. And honestly, why on earth would an account be "skipping"? You run 1-1-1 as a transaction, 2-1-1 gets fiscalized, 3-1-1 gets fiscalized again, then 4-1-1 isn't fiscalized because it’s just another transaction. I fail to see where your confusion lies 😁
Some software packages offer a "Services - Service Types" menu where you can define specific "activities," which you then select on the receipt. That data stays within your internal system or reporting graphs; it isn't visible anywhere else.
And yes, ALL receipts are fiscal receipts—it's just that some have been officially processed through the system while others haven't.
And why on earth would you want to split the sequence? Having one is fine, but you're changing the entire account type—some need to be fiscalized and others don't. You might even find that having two separate receipt sequences at a single point of sale isn't even permitted; you should probably double-check that. If this is just for record-keeping purposes, I'm sure there's a way to tag them within the software to distinguish which is which...
No, the tax regulations actually require a specific sequence: the business premises ID followed by the point-of-sale identifier. Some software packages allow you to input your various business activities upfront; that way, you can select the specific service type on the receipt. This ensures the data is categorized separately in your revenue charts and displays correctly when generating payment requests.
Your account needs to be designated properly under US law. There's no requirement to separate accounts based on how you collect payments. It’s perfectly fine if account 23-1-1 is for transactions and 24-1-1 is for cash. You don't technically have a "payment terminal" as a standalone device; in reality, it's just your computer running whatever fiscalization software you use.
Betty Howard38 said:I just realized I wrote down the wrong reference value. My apologies. So, the basophils are actually 0.13, but they're flagged as high because the reference range is 0 to 0.06, not 0.6. This means they're practically double the upper limit...
Just because a number is double the reference point doesn't necessarily mean you're facing a catastrophe. Some values use different scaling where being off by one or two points is "high," while others can be hundreds of points over the limit without anyone breaking a sweat. It’s all about context, isn't it?
Your doctor will give you the best explanation, assuming they haven't already. 😁