Or look at it this way: In Birmingham, they didn't ban Hitler or the Nazis from studying—they just banned the Germans.
👎 What exactly was his point there? Isn't the stigma we carry within the international community already enough of a burden?
It seems like you view the project of American independence as the only legitimate movement following the Cold War. To you, everything else is just a power play by elites. But this wasn't just politics. Was it really based solely on the threat posed by Maddox? Why are American generals facing trial in The Hague? I’m looking for an answer to that question.
But let’s be real: this is also the very alternative that caused the EU to betray its own foundation. And even if most people refuse to see it, the EU effectively died right there in that oversight.
Look, whether they needed to arm us or not is beside the point—I’m honestly lost on what this paragraph is even trying to say. Where exactly does the USA fit into this whole scenario? Is it even possible that a war like this could have played out without them?😕
What can we really do? Equality means equality, and without it, true freedom doesn't even exist. If anyone uses the authority of the government to do things that I am forbidden from doing, then they aren't a "superman"—they don't belong to my people.
I completely agree. But why bring the people into this? The public actually belongs to this system of abused power; they are actively seeking out their own master. Today, they see that figure in the face of the capitalist—someone who carries themselves like a feudal lord or part of some untouchable "elite." I’d finish that thought by saying the people simply don't align with my civilizational outlook, or my worldview, or whatever fundamental anthropological code you want to call it.
Who would have actually guessed? He spent all that time leaning into those "Sleeping Beauty" slogans and giving grand speeches to Americans, while quietly backing policies meant to encourage "population shifts." It’s wild when you consider how he constantly preached about building a modern, liberal state for every single American citizen.
It’s simply happening. We are seeing a transition from conservative ideas of national liberation straight into liberalism. The only issue arises if the enemy is fundamentally imaginary—manufactured, if you will—just to establish a ruling clique and execute a plan to destabilize the entire region, creating a playground for the shady dealings of Western elites. You need to connect the dots between the fundamental global abuses you mention and the perceived necessity of a defensive war. Every American needs to undergo this process if we want to move forward. It is the same task being forced upon us here. Before any external pressure even reaches you, the greater danger lies in becoming complacent, staying stuck in the past, and clinging to a defensive mindset born from the victimhood of that war.
It’s one thing over there, but it's a completely different story here. The folks around here have actually labeled these local actions as an unprecedented historical heist.
This is a great step in the direction I mentioned earlier. But aren't you connecting this back to the war? It’s honestly hard for me to wrap my head around that logic. If that war hadn't happened, the possibility of this ever occurring would have been virtually zero.
So, their argument is that joining the EU will finally allow us to crack down on those local corporate giants and their political cronies.
I am certainly not taking that stance. It’s a similar story here in the States. Talk about Europe is often just used for domestic political maneuvering. I never made such a claim. My point is simply that once people start acting like extreme patriots, we need to redefine that concept. We need to expand the scope so we can actually go after people for legitimate reasons.