J-C said:I was talking to a friend yesterday who weighs about 250 lbs, and I tried to explain that you can't just starve yourself to drop 90 pounds. There’s a massive risk of wrecking your body that way because you end up stripping away all your essential minerals and vitamins.
Starvation isn't the answer. Unless you're under strict medical supervision, no restrictive diet should ever dip below 1,200 calories. And honestly, those should be spread out over five or six small meals. Starving yourself just damages your system and wrecks your metabolism; the second you stop, the weight just crawls right back on. The whole point of a dietary change should be to fix your eating habits and regulate your metabolism. That's the only way you'll actually see results.
In my opinion, the most effective approach is the ADA diet used by diabetics. It's easy to follow, the food isn't monotonous, and frankly, it’s a lifestyle everyone should probably adopt for their daily lives...
As for this idea of "healthy eating," it doesn't really exist. Everything is essentially toxic if you look at it closely enough. It's all about the dosage—that's the difference between a nutrient and a poison. Someone once said that—my memory isn't what it used to be—but it's the truth.
Then there's the endless debate over white bread versus whole grain... You either eat pure starch, or you eat starch paired with minerals and vitamins, alongside whatever pesticides were left on the grain. Which one is better? To me, they both seem equally problematic, so I suppose it's just a matter of personal choice...