Susan Bishop92 said:how could the story be stupid?!
It’s common knowledge that basically any livestock raised for food is pumped full of antibiotics. So yeah, milk ends up loaded with all sorts of stuff too.
On top of those antibiotics (which definitely aren't harmless), milk goes through homogenization and pasteurization. After all that, there isn't even a tenth of the useful nutrients left compared to raw milk.
Sure, but milk gets run through several tests to check for antibiotics and other junk. When farmers try to sneak that kind of milk in, they don't get a dime from the dairy plant because they have to wait for the cow to clear the meds out of its system, and any tainted milk just gets tossed. Trust me, it's not worth it for them to try anything—they won't get paid and they'll ruin their reputation.
Once it hits the facility, the milk undergoes testing (the big one being for the pathogen
Listeria monocytogenes—the stuff that causes listeriosis, which is especially nasty for pregnant women).
Maybe do a little homework on the terms you're throwing around. Pasteurization is just heat treatment, meaning you heat the milk up to about 160 degrees F (usually around 160), and I don't see how you conclude that pasteurized milk loses its nutritional value. You think heating it destroys the milk fat or something? 😂 I don't get it 🤷