CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › darkpanther56 › Posts

Posts by darkpanther56

2 posts shown.

Brain CT scan in Health ·
First off, regarding pregnancy, both CT scans and MRIs carry contraindications. With a CT, you're dealing with ionizing radiation, and with an MRI, you're placed inside this intense magnetic field where we still don't have a definitive answer on how it might affect fetal development.
Secondly, there’s always a specific reason why one is chosen over the other—whether a CT is better or an MRI is preferred. I won't get us bogged down in a massive lecture right now about the clinical nuances of when to use which, but there's another practical factor: the cost. An MRI is significantly more expensive than a CT scan. Plus, from a logistical standpoint, a CT takes maybe 5 to 10 minutes, whereas an MRI can keep you tucked away in that machine for 30 to 45 minutes. It’s pretty obvious that within a standard workday, a hospital can churn through way more CTs than MRIs. That said, doctors aren't just throwing CTs around recklessly either; they won't send you for one unless it's absolutely necessary, since so many things can be diagnosed without needing that extra radiation.
EKG Results in Health ·
So, here is how it breaks down for you:
EXAMINATION RADIATION ABSORPTION

Chest X-ray (PA view) 0.002 mSv
Lumbar spine 120 X >
Abdominal X-ray 75 X >
Upper GI series 250 X >
Barium enema 450 X >
CT scan (chest or abdomen) 400 X >
Bone scans (radionuclide) 190 X >

And check this out:
A single chest X-ray is basically the same as three days of radiation from natural sources.
An upper GI series? That’s like 2.5 years worth of natural background radiation! And a barium enema... wow, that's about 4.5 years of exposure from natural sources.