The Hangover Part II
in Movies ·
The core concept behind The Hangover is actually brilliant... and honestly, it’s not really about the premise itself, but rather who is telling the story and how they deliver the punchlines.
It reminds me of those people who start bashing Dane Cook just because he uses certain comedic tropes...
Why does he work? Because he knows how to spin a tale, how to land a joke, and how to take something totally mundane and make it hilarious.
That trio that tore it up in The Hangover and is absolutely wild in the sequel—from the guy playing Stu, Zach Galifianakis, who basically carries the whole movie on his back, all the way to Bradley Cooper...
If you think the movie's idea is weak, then you clearly haven't been drunk enough to genuinely have no clue what happened the night before.
In case anyone wants to come at me with the "you're just mad" argument...
As for the guy suggesting a parody of The Hangover, he's right up there with the crowd that tries too hard to act like they enjoy "intellectual" humor when they're actually clueless...
*facepalm*
It reminds me of those people who start bashing Dane Cook just because he uses certain comedic tropes...
Why does he work? Because he knows how to spin a tale, how to land a joke, and how to take something totally mundane and make it hilarious.
That trio that tore it up in The Hangover and is absolutely wild in the sequel—from the guy playing Stu, Zach Galifianakis, who basically carries the whole movie on his back, all the way to Bradley Cooper...
If you think the movie's idea is weak, then you clearly haven't been drunk enough to genuinely have no clue what happened the night before.
In case anyone wants to come at me with the "you're just mad" argument...
As for the guy suggesting a parody of The Hangover, he's right up there with the crowd that tries too hard to act like they enjoy "intellectual" humor when they're actually clueless...
*facepalm*