CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › mistygull16 › Posts

Posts by mistygull16

201 posts shown.

Pros and cons of spiritual practices in Spirituality ·
Maria Parker77 said:
mistygull16 I can't even begin to process this... honestly, what are we even doing here? It’s like everyone just decided to lose their minds at once. Is anyone actually listening, or are we all just shouting into the void? Because from where I'm sitting, it looks like pure chaos. Seriously, does nobody have any common sense left? It's getting ridiculous.
Look, right now, your body is just a cold, hard fact. It’s a physical reality. If you didn't have a human body, what would you even be? Just some wandering ghost or some mindless animal roaming around? People always say that within the human frame is where our actual spiritual potential starts to grow. It's like the vessel we need to actually become something more, you know?

Alright, let's talk about the physical side of things first. You can't just jump straight into the deep end, right? With yoga, you start with the actual poses—the asanas—working through them step by step. It’s like building a foundation. You move bit by bit, inch by inch, using that physical practice to slowly peel back the layers until you finally start tapping into a higher dimension of existence. Makes sense, doesn't it?

The lotus is such a perfect metaphor, isn't it? Think about it—its roots are buried deep in the muck and sludge of a swamp. That’s basically us, right? It represents this messy, chaotic world we’re all struggling to grow through. But then, out of all that filth, you get this pristine flower blooming, showing off the absolute beauty of existence. And the kicker? The water—this entire world around it—can't even touch it. It just stays pure. Isn't that wild?

Look, I’ve got absolutely nothing against bodies, if that's what you're asking. Not even a little bit. Honestly? I couldn't care less. 🙂 Look, it’s not some immediate, undeniable fact, okay? Sure, for those of us stuck living in the "now"—the part of us trapped in the ticking clock of linear time—it might feel that way. But there’s more to the story. There are parts of us that exist entirely outside the concept of time altogether. We’re talking about that deeper layer, the stuff beneath the surface that actually matters. That’s the real essence, you know? It's the part that actually *creates* who we are. Without that, what are we even doing here? What’s the deal? What's the actual status of things? Everyone just sitting around waiting for something to happen? Give me the lowdown.

You ever hear that idea about how our physical bodies are just... I don't know, some kind of mental projection? Like, a manifestation of the mind? Honestly, I can't even wrap my head around starting with the physical stuff. Don't get me wrong, I love my body—I really do—but I don't exactly feel like I *begin* there. Does anyone else feel like their consciousness is running the show while the body is just sort of trailing along behind?

Now you're dragging me into deep philosophy and all these wild interpretations of the body.

The body is just... well, it's the first thing we see, right?

Whether you view your body as a blessing—a way to reach higher dimensions—or some kind of curse you need to shake off... honestly, that's just down to how you personally vibe with it.

So, what I was getting at is that the body acts as a crossroads, a sort of portal (whether it's an illusion or half-real or whatever, doesn't matter)... and we can go both ways.

When I say "out," I mean what we pick up through our senses. When I say "in," I mean consciousness, meditation, the true self... stuff like that.

I guess I meant that the material world and the spiritual side shouldn't have to be enemies, but you still gotta balance life a bit just to keep things running smoothly.
Pros and cons of spiritual practices in Spirituality ·
Maria Parker77 said:If we’re defining ourselves strictly by our physical bodies... then we’ve already lost the game. ☕ 😁

There is no "inside" versus "outside." If there is, they’re one and the same anyway.

Right now, the body is the only fact we've got. Without it, we'd just be ghosts or animals, or whatever. They say the human body is where that spiritual potential actually starts to grow.

So, personally, I start with the physical stuff. Like, yoga—you start with those poses and slowly, inch by inch, you start tapping into higher dimensions of existence.

The lotus is a good way to look at it. Its roots are stuck in the muck and mud of a swamp—kind of like the world we're trying to navigate—but then the flower itself rises up, showing all this beauty, while the water doesn't even touch it.
Pros and cons of spiritual practices in Spirituality ·
Maria Parker77 said:But hey, that whole logic only holds water if you can actually point to where the line is drawn between the "inside" and the "outside." If you can't show where the inner self ends and the outer world begins, then what are we even talking about?

I guess you could say the human body is kind of like a portal, bridging the gap between everything internal and everything external...
Pros and cons of spiritual practices in Spirituality ·
I wouldn't go so far as to say spiritual stuff is the polar opposite of material stuff—I mean, maybe in some weird way it is, but honestly? I just see it as what’s happening on the inside versus everything else on the outside.

So, we're basically "building" our own consciousness (our focus) in here, while out there in the real world, we've gotta keep grinding. The body needs its cut, you know? Like paying your taxes to the IRS or giving back to God.

The version of this that actually makes sense to me is that story about the student who tracks down a guru and asks, "Okay, what now?" And the guru just tells him to keep doing exactly what he's been doing. The student is like, "Wait, then what's the point?" and the guru says, "The point is to be fully aware of everything you're doing from now on."

Or there's that whole Buddhist vibe where they say when you're sitting, just know you're sitting; when you're walking, just know you're walking. It's all about putting the weight on being conscious of ourselves and every little thing we do.
Can meditation actually help me? in Spirituality ·
David Vaughn75 said:
I can't even begin to tell you how much I hate seeing this kind of nonsense pop up on my feed—it’s like every single day there’s some new flavor of absolute madness being pushed by people who clearly haven't spent five minutes looking at the actual reality of things. It’s exhausting, honestly. You sit down, hoping for a little bit of sanity, and instead, you get hit with this wave of complete and utter delusion. I mean, seriously? Is anyone actually buying this stuff anymore? It reminds me of this one time back when I was working that dead-end gig in Chicago—you know, the one where the manager thought he could solve every single logistical nightmare just by shouting louder? That was exactly the vibe here. Just loud, empty noise masquerading as "insight." It’s all just theater, man. Pure, unadulterated theater designed to make people feel like they’ve stumbled onto some grand secret when, in reality, they’re just being played like a cheap fiddle. I'm so over it. Everything feels increasingly hollow, like we're all just circling the drain while everyone pretends everything is perfectly fine. It’s enough to make you want to just unplug the whole damn machine and walk away. kaže:
I honestly don't get the logic here—like, if someone actually managed to tap into some kind of real power or spiritual breakthrough, why on earth would they automatically end up in Hell? It’s such a weird contradiction. It feels like the whole system is rigged to say you have to be totally broken, miserable, and pathetic just to catch a glimpse of Heaven. But honestly? If you ask me, living a life of pure misery and self-pity is probably the fastest, most surefire way to land straight in the fire.

Look, regarding that whole bhakti thing you mentioned—I’m totally with you. I honestly think bhakti is the easiest path out of all of them, but here’s my take: I don't really view God as some "person" sitting up there like one of us mortals. To me, God is more like the fundamental essence, the actual source of everything within every single one of us. I see bhakti as this deep, unshakable sense of trust—it's about finally letting go and just being free from all that constant, nagging fear.

People say Kundalini is this purely feminine principle—and honestly? I believe it. Because let’s be real, when it comes to women, there is absolutely zero room for playing around. They don't mess around.

Look, let’s get one thing straight—hell isn't about whether you were a saint or a sinner, or if you died with a fat bank account or nothing to your name. That whole "good vs. evil" or "rich vs. poor" narrative? It’s total nonsense. People love to project their own earthly drama onto the afterlife, thinking there’s some cosmic scorecard based on how much they donated to charity or how many zeros were in their checking account at Chase, but that's just not how it works. It doesn't care about your status or your moral high ground. It’s something else entirely.
Look, if you’re the kind of person who thinks you can just go rogue—just coast through life relying solely on your own ego without ever needing anyone else—then honestly? You're heading straight to hell. I mean it. There's this massive delusion that you can just sit in some lonely corner of the world, try to reach "enlightenment" or whatever, without actually interacting with other souls. It’s impossible. If you try to find truth while cutting yourself off from everyone else, you’re just going to end up with some twisted, warped version of reality. And once you start operating on that fake, misguided understanding? That's when things get ugly. Wrong perception leads directly to shitty actions, plain and simple. You can't skip the human element and expect to come out clean on the other side.

So, I’ve got this one little story that pretty much sums up how the whole world works—you know, that messy, chaotic reality we’re all stuck in. Picture this: God decides to set up this weird little social experiment in a single room. He gathers a bunch of angels and demons together, but here’s the kicker—He ties their hands behind their backs. And what does He tie to their hands? A single spoon, about six feet long. Just a massive, ridiculous utensil. In the dead center of the room, there’s a huge pile of food. It looks incredible, right? Everything you could ever want. Now, watch how it plays out. The demons—bless their chaotic little hearts—start doing these insane, frantic acrobatics, twisting and turning, trying every desperate trick in the book just to get a tiny bit of food from the end of that long spoon into their own mouths. It’s pure madness, total self-destruction just to grab a bite. But the angels? They aren't even breaking a sweat. They just use the spoon to feed one another. Simple, elegant, and actually gets the job done. It’s kind of a cynical way to look at things, I guess—seeing everyone scrambling and tearing themselves apart while others just... cooperate—but man, sometimes it feels like that’s exactly what we’re watching on the news every single night. 😉

Look, you’re out here calling me a personalist like it’s some big revelation—but honestly? You clearly haven't got a clue what you're talking about. 😁
Look, if you actually lived by the principles of Advaita, there's no way on earth you'd be clinging to that nationalist, socialist nonsense. It just doesn't compute. ☕

Yeah, we definitely caught on that you're an atheist.🙄

Look, this isn't the place where we sit around explaining to each other why every single religion is wrong just because they lack scientific proof. If you want to start a thread like that, fine, then we can debate *why* people believe in anything, or you can just go hit your head against a wall if you're just here to troll.😁 ☕

I’ve been oversimplifying the whole heaven and hell thing lately. What I mean is, all this material stuff on Earth? It doesn't even have to be a "temptation" or anything like that. If you've actually caught a glimpse of higher blessings, then the real problem—the thing that actually screws us over—is just pure fear and doubt.

So, I've got this little story for you. Basically, God puts a bunch of angels and demons in a room together, ties their hands behind their backs, and then hitches a two-foot-long spoon to their wrists. There’s a pile of food sitting right in the middle of the room. The demons? They’re all over the place, pulling these wild, chaotic stunts trying to somehow scoop the food from the end of that long spoon into their own mouths. But the angels... they just sit there and use the spoons to feed one another. Simple, right? 😉

I kinda did the same thing when I was describing hell. To me, it’s basically this place where you're forced to eat another living thing just so it doesn't end up eating you first. Kind of a grim cycle, right? Then for heaven, I pictured it as a place defined by solidarity—basically looking at it through the lens of material hell versus material heaven.

You're just a total personalist, you just don't get it. 😁
If you actually understood Advaita, you wouldn't be such a nationalist or a socialist. ☕

Some politician told us things were looking up for us... that we’re actually better off than we realize. Honestly? I don't know if I buy it. Just one of those things, you know? Feels like we're all just kind of stumbling through the dark while they tell us everything's fine. Typical.

I mean, I could pretty much be anything, really. I don't really carry around a bunch of biases or whatever. Diversity doesn't bother me one bit. So if you want to label me a socialist and a nationalist at the same time... fine. Go for it. To me, it’s just simple logic: no single individual should have the right to exploit another person, and on the flip side, no collective—like a whole nation—should be out there trying to colonize or mess with another group. That's just how I see it.

So, Advaita... basically that whole state of absolute oneness thing. I’m a believer that at the ultimate source level, we’re all just one single entity, you know? But here in this physical, material world? Yeah, we’re definitely dealing with a massive crowd of separate pieces. It's a lot to wrap your head around.
Can meditation actually help me? in Spirituality ·
David Vaughn75 said:The skeptics call it Mayavada stuff—just materialists or power-hungry types—but honestly? If you try that route without ending up in hell, your odds are basically one in a million. ☕
To stay on a strictly impersonal track, you’d need an insane amount of knowledge, and let's face it, we're living in the Kali Yuga—that kind of wisdom just isn't lying around anymore. That’s why the personal path, the path of serving a divine Person, is much more practical and, frankly, easier.

Everyone—including you—keeps harping on about "enlightenment," but that's missing the whole point. The real goal here is getting to know a divine Person. If you want to actually earn the favor of God, you have to understand who He is and how to show Him devotion. 😉

But I don't really get this part either—if someone actually achieved (I don't know) some kind of powers, why would they necessarily end up in hell? It makes it sound like a person has to be totally miserable and pathetic just to make it to heaven, which seems backwards. Honestly, I feel like being miserable and pathetic is the fastest way to hell.

Regarding the bhakti you mentioned, I also think bhakti is the easiest route, but I don't experience God as a "person" in the way one of us is a person. To me, God is fundamentally the source of our very existence. I see bhakti more as having total trust and being completely free from fear.

And as for kundalini, they say it’s the feminine principle, and we all know women don't mess around when it comes to that stuff.😁
Can meditation actually help me? in Spirituality ·
Maria Parker77 said:Look, you can have all sorts of wild experiences, but I’m telling you, Kundalini is definitely a force for good. 🙂

If you're looking for a way in, I’d highly recommend checking out the guided meditations from Kelly Howell Awakening Kundalini. I haven't been at this forever, but I've probably blasted through those sessions at least 500 times by now. That's really all I've got for you. 😁

But what does it actually boil down to? I mean, reading about these intense experiences... it’s kind of confusing. People talk about this massive power shift, but then you wonder if there's anything left afterward—like, does it leave you with some kind of clarity, or just being totally free from fear and sadness? It's hard to wrap my head around when I read these accounts. 🤔

Some folks say you don't even need to wake up your Kundalini to hit enlightenment, while others swear it's the only way. Then you've got the crowd saying it's tied to siddhis, which might actually get in the way of your spiritual progress, not to mention all the warnings about it being dangerous... 🤷
Can meditation actually help me? in Spirituality ·
Kevin Ruiz36 said:You have to be careful with breathwork meditation. There are way too many stories out there about people triggering their Kundalini prematurely and dealing with a massive fallout afterward. If that energy surges before your centers and channels are actually cleared to handle the flow, you’re looking at serious mental and physical issues. Kundalini is raw, cosmic power—not something to mess with lightly.

I remember my own experience when it hit. It felt like an endless surge of heat and electricity coursing through me, from the soles of my feet all the way up to the hair on my head. Honestly, it felt like my body had become a nuclear reactor, with every single atom vibrating with this intense thermal energy. My lungs felt crushed, like I was breathing in a vacuum, and my ears were ringing with nothing but this strange, rushing sound of pure energy. By the time it passed—about thirty minutes in—I was completely spent. It drained every ounce of physical strength I had.

That wasn't the last time I felt something that heavy. I've had a few other intense experiences similar to what I just described. I already posted some details about it over in the Kundalini awakening thread.

So, what's even the point of Kundalini Shakti then? If there's a higher chance of everything going sideways than actually being positive, what are we even looking for if the centers *are* actually cleared?

I’ve read some accounts where people describe feeling warmth or tingling and then it just... fades away. It’s all a bit confusing, honestly.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Casey Ramos31 said:By trying to isolate America from everyone else. And look, when it comes to these global elites, America isn't exactly huge enough to go it alone without any strings attached. We're basically forced to pick a side, and honestly? I think sticking with the NATO crowd is our best bet.

But hey, we don't have to roll over before they try to steamroll us. A little dignity wouldn't hurt, right?

Since nobody seems to be messing with Israel, maybe we should look at our own expats—they could be a solid voting bloc for whatever options actually work for us.

It's not even about whether we *can* do it... America is a blessed nation, and we definitely have the capacity.

The real issue here is the people who don't actually care about this country, or the ones who just can't help themselves when foreign elites start throwing around incentives.

I'll say it again: back when Harmon passed, you didn't see representatives from those global elites showing up to the funeral. But nowadays? They're practically tripping over themselves to recruit these politicians. I think you can probably guess why.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Casey Ramos31 said:Yeah, right. How are we supposed to film anything when they slap a junk tax on Praljko for work that’s clearly just documentary footage about the American Civil War in Canada?

Basically, we end up with leaders who care more about the Brussels crowd and the banking elite than anyone else. It's a joke. 🤷

We just keep voting for the people who sold out the whole country.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Look, I totally get how risky it feels to push back against the European Union or NATO—it’s kind of like being the lone dissenter against the old establishment parties back in the day—but honestly, if we aren't fighting for actual sovereignty, then what's even the point of talking about our nation's future?

My take? It actually works in our favor that the world isn't just one big monopoly anymore. We've got Russia, China, Iran... there's room to play the field a little. I'm not saying we need to go out and declare war on the European Union or NATO, obviously, but we shouldn't be naive enough to think their banks and those massive embargoes are somehow doing us a favor when it comes to primary investment here in the States. They used to try and block our ability to defend ourselves, but Harmon was smart enough to sidestep that nonsense.

I know, I know, we're basically a colony at this point, but nobody's ever going to force me to sit here and say America should just throw everything in the trash!

And let's not bring up North Korea, because that's a dictatorship where the people have zero agency. When I talk about the American people, I'm talking about a sovereign nation.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Anthony Cooper2 said:@mistygull16: Short and sweet! 👍

I’d also love to dive into the cultural side of things for a second—personally, I think it's absolutely vital for the government to step up and back our major cultural institutions, you know? We're talking about the big-deal stuff like museums, national theaters, or even major publishing houses. Honestly, it breaks my heart a little when I see places like small towns in the Midwest or rural parts of Texas—where you can barely find a single decent little bookstore, but man, there's a damn betting parlor or a liquor store on every single corner. It’s just... yikes!! Also, looking at the bigger picture globally, we really need to push American literature harder. We should be translating our classics—think guys like Hemingway, Faulkner, or Steinbeck—into every major language out there. They need to be accessible to everyone, everywhere. Now, I get it—on paper, that doesn't look like a massive money-maker, and honestly, it probably isn't, but in my book, it's absolutely essential.

Totally agree.

We just have to be sovereign enough to actually do what's best for society. I'd add that we haven't even managed to film a single decent movie about the Civil War that would actually show our kids what went down in an engaging way.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Forgot the most important part, though... it’s just God sitting above the new order in Congress.

Basically, we need to tell those big-shot capital cities like Brussels to screw off. We shouldn't have people in black suits who've never even laid eyes on a ballot box deciding the fate of the USA!
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Absolute sovereignty, period.

Screw the foreign bankers! Or, if you want to put it the American way: let’s get our dollars back into American pockets. We need to call out those traitors who sold off our banks and basically shackled the US economy to the whims of the global elite. They should be prosecuted and punished properly for high treason.

Look, sovereignty is just a hollow word if we don't have control over our own damn treasury. It's all bullshit without a sovereign cash flow.

We should ban foreign investment in places where we've been blessed with natural resources. Honestly, we don't need those "God-given" foreign investments in tourism or whatever—those massive international hotel chains are basically just stealing our market share from us.

Then, we really need to push some pro-natalist policies. Forget all those quotas and trendy projects about getting more women into politics or business... let's actually implement a program for mothers and provide free childcare instead. That's what matters.

Without doing the stuff above, everything else is just pure demagoguery.
Spiritual Guides and How to Work With Them in Spirituality ·
Thomas Nelson25 said:A woman? Give me more on that, sounds pretty interesting.

Honestly, I'm kind of out of the loop here. I just saw some characters in this old art book or something... there was this lady in white who supposedly shows up right before a war starts. Pretty sure it's just some local legend from back in the Midwest or maybe Appalachia, but I can't be 100% sure. There’s also those creepy forest creatures at night—the reason some ladies won't leave their laundry out overnight and have to bring everything in before dark...
Spiritual Guides and How to Work With Them in Spirituality ·
Since God is basically unknowable, over in India they have this concept of Ishta Devata—or something like that, I don't want to get bogged down in the specifics right now—which is like having a personal deity. It’s usually just one of the many gods or angels on offer, but it’s not the ultimate Reality itself; it’s more like a set of handholds to help us stay grounded.

Then you’ve got the folks who think people can actually manifest certain astral phenomena. These aren't even beings, let alone anything divine. Some might say it could be Kali; there’s even that old legend about a woman in white appearing in the US right before a war breaks out...

Regarding Kali and those other female deities, you could say they're energies manifesting through specific chakras. For instance, Kali, or even Durga, which a lot of people find pretty cool, are energies tied to the lower chakras—basically, when they lose their temper, Shiva just clears out. In the higher chakras, you start seeing the energies of Parvati (that maternal vibe) and Saraswati (knowledge), and at the very highest chakra, Shiva and Shakti show up as One.

And there are these stories from far-off India about a paradise called Devaloka. It’s not exactly the ultimate goal for a spiritual seeker, but it’s a slightly better place to hang out than Earth, and Indra is the ruler there. Now, much like heaven and hell, these different levels of paradise aren't permanent. Indra is actually a little paranoid about losing his throne, so whenever he sees someone making serious spiritual progress, his seat starts shaking, and he’ll send one of those celestial dancers—an apsara or whatever—to try and distract the spiritualist with some worldly passions.

So, I guess the question is: are these tales meant to describe how the universe actually works, or are they warnings? Like, maybe they're telling us that even when we reach higher states of consciousness, we still run into obstacles like fear or greed... or maybe it's all just cosmic entertainment and heavenly adrenaline rushes...
Are seminar prices getting out of hand? in Spirituality ·
John Baker said:And honestly, I’d prefer that extreme over the one where spirituality is just a business. Which is pretty much what it is today. And a damn good business at that.
I know plenty of these "spiritual entrepreneurs" whose actual lives are a total wreck once you look past the polished image.
In my opinion, these kinds of services should only be charged symbolically. Mixing materialism with spirituality is disgusting. I could never believe in the spiritual depth of someone charging inflated prices for their "guidance."🙂
Besides, I've seen enough to know it's true.

Not trying to make excuses for her, but she does put out free videos and stuff. Still, I guess we Americans tend to measure everything by the price tag...

But look, I didn't get any clarification from the OP on why they're even heading to this seminar. Is it curiosity? A spiritual calling? Some health thing? Or something else entirely?

I listened to a bit of one of her videos where she talks about living on this super clean, organic, vegan diet, but then she ended up getting cancer anyway—she claimed it was all because she was doing it out of fear, like the fear itself was what messed her up.

A doctor once told me it's better to live an unhealthy life without being obsessed, rather than trying to live healthy while being completely consumed by the obsession of it all.

Bottom line, the price is steep for most people. If that money lets her keep working with folks, fine, I can wrap my head around that. But if it’s just about lining her pockets? Yeah, that doesn't sit right with me...
Are seminar prices getting out of hand? in Spirituality ·
Karen Adams2 said:I really loathe starting new threads, I truly do, but this has been weighing on my mind so heavily lately... and I just haven't been able to find a single existing discussion where this would actually fit properly...
We’re talking about Anita Moorjani, a woman who was battling end-stage lymphoma when she unexpectedly slipped into a coma... and it was during that profound state of unconsciousness that she underwent an incredible near-death experience... which completely changed everything...
Here is the link, just in case anyone wants to take a look...

I’ve been sitting here staring at this video, trying to wrap my head around everything being said, and I honestly feel like my brain is vibrating... It’s one of those pieces of content that just hits you right in the gut, isn't it? You start watching thinking it's just going to be another deep dive into spiritual healing or some niche metaphysical concept, but then it evolves into something much more profound about the very nature of our reality and how we perceive suffering... There is such a heavy, beautiful weight to the way they discuss the intersection of consciousness and physical manifestation. It reminds me so much of what Anita Moorjani talks about regarding the shift in perception required to move through intense trauma. It’s not just about "thinking positive"—it’s about a fundamental restructuring of how we relate to the world around us... if we can truly grasp that, everything changes. I was scrolling through some of the comments earlier, and I saw a few thoughts from Karen Adams2 and Michael Gonzalez77 that really resonated with the themes presented here. They were touching on that idea of collective resonance, which is something I think we often overlook in our individual pursuits of wellness. We tend to focus so much on our own little bubbles, forgetting that we are part of this massive, interconnected web of energy that spans the entire country... It makes me wonder if we are all collectively standing on the precipice of a massive paradigm shift. If we actually applied these principles—this level of radical awareness—to our daily lives in America, the social fabric might look entirely different... though I suppose that’s a bit idealistic, isn't it? Still, it’s worth pondering...

Apparently, after all that, she finally had this massive epiphany about the true meaning of life—you know, all that stuff about universal love and finding your purpose... and since then, she’s gone on to publish several books and travels all over the States hosting workshops that are supposed to help people find their way...
So, looking ahead to March, they’ll be heading our way, and the cost to attend those two days is exactly $275—not a penny more, and certainly not a penny less...😲
Those who had the sheer misfortune of landing in an oncology ward have been granted a special concession, meaning their cost is reduced to just about $160...
[Applause]

I mean, good grief...?
For some people, that amount represents almost their entire paycheck...
It seems to me that survivors of sexual assault, as well as those who have successfully fought their way through alcoholism or addiction, often feel this deep-seated compulsion to reach back and pull others up behind them... They want to share everything they've learned from their own struggles to help others heal, yet more often than not, they end up doing this work entirely for free...
In this particular instance, I don't necessarily believe it should be offered for free, but the gap between a zero-dollar price tag and a $250 charge is quite literally a massive leap...
It’s honestly so ugly and heartbreaking all at once that this entire situation just feels completely hollow to me...
I honestly feel like that money should be used to just silence the doctors, if only to stop them from continuing to validate her whole miraculous healing narrative...
I honestly just cannot wrap my head around this level of sheer greed... and please, don't take this personally, I truly mean no offense by it—but for me, there simply isn't any other way to describe it...
It is truly heartbreaking to think about how much these poor souls battling cancer have to endure, yet they’re only being charged a mere $160...
And what about those who don't even have access to that? Do they simply have no right to hear this story...?

It’s exactly that kind of mindset that pushes me away from the whole thing... I’m certainly not suggesting that everything comes without a cost, nor am I implying that someone should just ride around on a donkey and live off the charity of others...
That’s one extreme right there... and then you have this other side of the spectrum.
Is it just me, or does this entire situation feel incredibly off-putting?
I would truly love to hear what everyone else thinks about this...

What's the actual hook for you here? Is it meeting her, the specific techniques, the lectures...?

Maybe—and I'm just rambling here—maybe she wants those two days to feel more "substantial" because people actually value things they pay for. You know how it is; when stuff is free, we take it for granted, even if it works via the placebo effect (which, hey, if it heals you, who cares?).

We Americans tend to measure value by the price tag and 🤔

It just feels a little tacky to exploit illness just to stack cash. But if she’s using that money to spend more time being out there inspiring people, I guess that's fair enough.

Personally, I think if someone has a knack for helping people—even if it's just placebo magic—they should charge for it. Better to get paid than to be too broke to ever have the time to do the work.

Still, $250 seems like a massive stretch, especially for places like the US or similar economies.

Speaking of money, I heard that over in India they have these medical mantras, but the person performing them isn't allowed to take even a single cent. They have to follow these super strict rules for the mantra to actually work. Seems like the complete opposite end of the spectrum to me.

Not exactly a genius, am I?
Why was my thread about feminism in politics closed? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Charles Fox10 said:My colleague made a fair point about closing the thread; unfortunately, discussions like this always seem to hit a dead end eventually. This specific topic regarding the 2008 Act—which should take effect following the next US elections—has simply run its course. A little patience, and we'll see how things unfold. Thanks.

I don't think the topic is actually "dead," though. We haven't even seen the implementation yet, especially now that the conditions for preferential voting are finally ripe—even if they're going to get totally messed up by those quota rules.

Anyway, that's why I started this other thread on feminism as a political movement. It needs to be a much bigger conversation than the last one, since feminism is everywhere. But it doesn't usually show up through actual democratic processes—you know, like votes or referendums—but more like an order handed down from above. If we’re actually a free society without all that feminist dogma being shoved down our throats, there really ought to be a dedicated space for it in politics.
Why was my thread about feminism in politics closed? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Honestly, I was pretty annoyed that the thread about quotas got locked. It made me want to give a straight answer to the big question: does feminism even deserve this kind of scrutiny? Because, from where I’m sitting, women aren't actually getting anything out of it, yet the media keeps giving a platform to anyone willing to drone on about those same old, tired talking points regarding the gender pay gap.

We haven't had a single referendum on the matter, and we don't even have a feminist political party trying to push their agenda through the democratic process. And yet, somehow, feminism remains totally untouchable—like it's some kind of sacred mystery or something.

Look, it's not like we're all idiots in this country.

Thanks for understanding.