CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Ronald Castillo5 › Posts

Posts by Ronald Castillo5

67 posts shown.

Noah Young16 said:There’s a massive difference between checking a box on a survey about moving abroad and actually sitting down to make a plan and leaving.

Young people (and I probably still count myself in that group🙂 tend to be pretty unhappy with things, and just saying they want to move is often just their way of venting that frustration.

That’s a great way to put it.

What do you think... isn't that just how most people operate...

They spend so much time complaining about how things suck—even when it's true—but very few people are actually ready to take big, decisive steps to change their lives for the better...
But then again, about eight months ago, I remember seeing it in the Wall Street Journal or some other news outlet, maybe even scrolling past it on my feed... that 70% of young people want to move abroad.
Germany is definitely one of those highly socialized nations in the West. But that comes at a cost, as they've been dealing with some massive economic hurdles over the last decade.

This guy walked away with a severance package, though it wasn't exactly life-changing...

The thing is, cash disappears faster than you think. No amount of severance is ever going to set you up for life...
Oh man, honestly...

When goldengull3 and Carl Cox—who aren't exactly kids anymore—see reasons to move abroad, then you know there must be plenty of younger people feeling the same way too...

I guess my question is more about the consequences of what I see. It seems like young people in the US today actually live better and earn more than my generation did back in the early 90s, when we were scraping by on what felt like pennies...

But still...

Carl Cox... yeah... it comes down to choice. Moving abroad obviously opens up way more doors. It’s not just about finding a specific company in your field; it’s the fact that in the US, it's totally normal to switch careers several times throughout your life. There's just much more variety in every sense...

Looking at your situation, it feels a bit stuck. If a boss decides to exploit you to the limit, you don't really have much of a say...

I think if you have the expertise over in the States, it wouldn't be a huge hurdle to try starting your own thing. Of course, you'd have to learn how to run a business just as well as you handle the technical side. That entrepreneurial spirit is much more encouraged in the West compared to here, where people are mostly just worried about being tossed aside once they hit 50...

Because that happens everywhere, even in America. A friend of mine is 55, and he was let go at 50 after 25 years on the job. Believe me, he wasn't in any worse shape than anyone else in a similar spot locally, maybe even worse. He might still have his mortgage, two kids studying overseas, and since he's healthy and fit, he could easily live another 40 years... but from what? Now at 50, he's forced to start from scratch... trying to build his own business, because nobody wants to hire him regardless of his experience. And starting a business is brutal because he now has to master all these things he never needed to care about while he was tucked away in a corporate role...

Like, when he needs basic spreadsheets or some Excel formulas made, he calls me... it's honestly painful to watch. Time has passed him by, but he has no choice; he has to try...

The reality is the same everywhere: if you haven't made it by 50, you're basically done. That's why you need to secure yourself before those years hit. You have a much better shot if you jump into your own venture early, rather than relying on private employers whose interests are fundamentally opposed to yours. Their goal is usually to keep your pay as low as possible... and they didn't start businesses just to do favors for employees...

So, Carl Cox... I really see how having options is such a massive advantage. But you have to adapt to the circumstances to actually make use of the choices being offered to you...

Honestly, your life story sounds like a very realistic reflection of the situation there. For many people your age, even buying an apartment is still a massive struggle. Plenty of people are still living with their parents...

In the West, the options are definitely broader and the reality is different. Buying a place becomes a real possibility almost as soon as you land a job (though some choose not to because they want to spend their 30s just living it up). I studied over in the UK and managed to buy a house... even though I had to pay tuition. Students there didn't always have to pay tuition, so they ended up drowning in debt just to cover living expenses and graduated with thousands in the red... whereas I had to pay for school *plus* my living costs just so I could afford that house before graduation. Many of them are only now, five years later, thinking about buying a place (and now everything costs twice as much)... meanwhile, when I tell them I'll be paying off my mortgage soon... they practically faint...

What I mean is, many people born in the West don't even realize what opportunities they have. We're the ones who didn't grow up with those advantages, so they seem much more obvious to us...

So, for Westerners, there are tons of opportunities in their own countries... but for those of us coming from our home countries... maybe there are even more opportunities because we recognize them more clearly...

I don't know...

I'm trying to figure out if young people today actually have more reasons to stay in America than they did ten years ago. And what those reasons would even be...
So, I left America back in the fall of 1994, right after the war ended. Back then, the outlook and opportunities for a young guy weren't exactly rosy. In the States, I was doing some studying, but before that, I was working for about $10 an hour. That was pretty standard at the time. I’d put in 150 hours a month and pull in maybe $1,500... which is roughly what you'd call a tiny amount today. I spent six months saving up $5,000 just so I’d have enough to put together a decent wedding, since my parents couldn't help out at all. Then, just two weeks before the big day, a pickpocket on the subway swiped my wallet with the whole $5,000 inside while I was heading to exchange some cash.

Looking back at how things were in America then, I felt like many other young people—if the hourly pay in Albania had been even $30, I probably would have headed there too.

Honestly, given the circumstances back then, deciding to move abroad wasn't even a hard choice. Paychecks overseas were easily 15 to 25 times higher. In America during that era, things like home loans didn't exist—dreaming of owning a house was about as realistic as a trip to Venus... plus, unemployment was twice what it is now.

Things are different today. Nowadays, young people in places like Washington, D.C., are making anywhere from $3,000 to $4,500 a month... and of course, why would they completely upend their lives and leave the country just to maybe double or triple their income elsewhere, especially when the cost of living is so much higher? A lot of them actually have a real shot at slowly tackling the housing market and stuff like that.

It makes me wonder... do young people today actually feel any "need" to leave America?

Why would they go?

Is it just to make more money? Money definitely isn't the sole motivator anymore, because the gap isn't nearly as massive as it was back in '94...

Or is it to chase ambitious goals that just aren't possible here?

Are there even young people who want to move abroad, and if so, why?
Gym talk in Other Sports ·
Meal 5 - 5:30 PM

A four-egg omelet topped with sliced turkey ham
And 29 grams of rice.

Meal 6 - 8:00 PM

A protein shake

That’s the plan, pretty much the same stuff for the next 6 weeks...
Gym talk in Other Sports ·
This whole thing is pretty daunting for me... I've never tried a strict regimen like this before. That’s honestly why I’ve been so inconsistent lately.

Unfortunately, my job keeps me sitting at a desk all day... I have to squeeze in three meals while I'm on the clock... I usually prep my food in Tupperware the night before... then I eat at 9:30, 12:00, and 14:30. It takes Jean about 5 to 8 minutes to finish an eating session... the portions aren't huge, and I'll be heading to the restroom soon anyway.

Once I get home around 5:30, things get easier... maybe one more protein shake around 7:30 or 8:00...

I mean, anything is possible if you try...

here's what's on the menu now:

Meal 4 (14:30):

160g of chicken and some salad.

I've already downed 2 liters of water today...

gotta go hit the bathroom... 🙂 🙂
Gym talk in Other Sports ·
Man...

Lunch (12:00 PM):

160 grams of chicken breast and 40 grams of rice.
Gym talk in Other Sports ·
Stipe23 said:Exactly.
Just keep in mind that a "diet" actually refers to nutrition—any controlled eating plan is technically a diet. It’s not what those clueless people on social media call a "diet," like just eating three oranges and five pineapples alongside two cups of yogurt.

Of course that’s what I meant. A diet is a way of eating, not starvation. Living here in England, that’s how the word is used, though I know in America it could be misunderstood, like you mentioned... just having two lettuce leaves and calling it a day.

So, a diet is a nutritional pattern, not starving yourself.

There is no such thing as a "fat burning zone."

That topic is constantly being researched with totally conflicting reports. Personally, I don't hold a rigid view on it, other than my own experience, which tells me that high-intensity cardio can visibly impact muscle mass, which isn't ideal.

Look, the fundamental difference between burning fat during low vs. high intensity training is burning total fat versus burning a percentage of fat. Basically, at higher intensities, you burn a larger total amount of fat, whereas at lower intensities, you burn a higher percentage of fat relative to your total calorie burn.

http://www.ivillage.com/diet/experts...ival_freqCap=2

What I was trying to illustrate is that for my specific program, lower intensity works better for me because I don't necessarily need to torch massive amounts of calories. I think that's the goal for someone like Mayakovsky, who just wants to melt some belly fat to show off his six-pack.

Someone with more weight to lose will definitely benefit from the higher total calorie burn achieved through high-intensity cardio.

I'm curious if you'd agree that in my case, lower intensity might be better if I do it consistently seven days a week, especially since my diet for these six weeks will involve extremely low fat and only about 150 grams of carbs a day?

I regularly chat with bodybuilders competing at various levels, and they usually tell me this.

You can eat as much fruit as you want without worrying about gaining fat from it.
Depending on the person, the last meal could be an hour before bed, or even thirty minutes, without any issues. My digestion handles all that overnight just fine.

Well, your metabolism is probably quite different from the average person's.

Even though everyone's metabolism slows down while sleeping, making digestion less efficient and causing food to be stored as fat.

http://www.ivillage.com/diet/feature...1541-4,00.html

Fruit is definitely beneficial in a standard diet, but on my specific program with strictly controlled carb intake, I keep fruit to a minimum.

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/exercises.htm

This site also has great descriptions of exercises. But then again, it's always best to have someone actually show you.
Gym talk in Other Sports ·
It’s easy for you guys to joke around, but I’m actually out here starting Day 1 of my new regimen...

Just to be clear, I’m not overweight at all. My physique and muscle mass are fine, but I really want to drop my body fat from about 14% down to around 8%.

I’ve already knocked out my first two meals:

Meal 1 (7 am)

- Oatmeal with milk, mixed with 56 grams of protein powder (which packs about 38 grams of protein) and a banana. That brings the total to roughly 50 grams of protein.

Meal 2 (9:30 am)

- A can of tuna (130 grams drained—about 30 grams of protein).

Plus 40 grams of cooked rice and some green salad. Total comes to about 35 grams of protein.

Heading to the gym now. Shoulders are on the menu today:

5 different exercises, 20 sets, 10 reps each.

Then it’s on to Meal 3. I need to knock back at least 1.5 liters of water before then...

Does anyone actually want to follow these daily updates, or should I just stop posting?
Gym talk in Other Sports ·
Casey Evans3 said:I'm tall and not overweight, but I have a little belly and those extra rolls are bothering me. So, I want to lose that and maybe pick up some muscle along the way, though I'm not looking to become a bodybuilder.

Running? Yeah, I do that at the local park a few times a week, just doing a lap or two around the trail. It works for me.

So, running, hitting the gym, and maybe a diet (which I don't really need since I don't eat nearly as much as I used to 😁


Rhett, I've been hitting the gym for years and have tried all sorts of sports. Sometimes I even design workout programs and coach people.

You can't get huge in just a few months. If someone wants to build real muscle naturally, it’s a multi-year grind involving hard training and a very disciplined diet.

Anyone who knows what they're doing will tell you that diet is way more important than most people realize. Personally, my issue isn't eating junk food—it's being inconsistent. I'm incredibly disciplined when it comes to lifting, but my nutrition is hit or miss. That's why my abs are rock hard, but you can't see them because they're hidden under a thin layer of fat.

That's basically the bottom line... you can kill yourself working out in the gym, but if fat is covering your muscles, you won't see any results.

And you only get rid of fat through nutrition and cardio.

You mentioned you don't eat much, but I've actually designed weight loss programs where people ate more than they ever had before. What matters is *what* you eat and eating frequently—at least six times a day or more.

I'm about 5'10" and 185 lbs. I'm relatively muscular, with body fat around 14-15% right now. Starting tomorrow, I'm beginning a six-week regimen to drop my body fat down to about 7-8%.

There are two ways to burn fat: cardio and cutting back on carbs and fats.

For cardio, I wouldn't recommend running. Brisk walking is much more effective, or something similar, as long as your heart rate stays between 120-140 beats per minute (you can track this with a smartwatch). That's the fat-burning zone. If you run too hard, your heart rate climbs too high, and you risk losing muscle mass, which is the last thing we want.

For these six weeks, I'll be doing brisk walking or very light jogging for 45 minutes every single day... seven days a week. The most effective way is to do it first thing in the morning on an empty stomach while glycogen levels are low; that's when the body starts burning fat much faster. If you do cardio after a meal, your metabolism uses the carbs you just ate first before it even touches the fat. It's best to start burning fat immediately when there are no carbs available. That's just how metabolism works—carbs are the primary energy source, so they get used first. Only once the carbs are spent does the body turn to fat.

The diet following this fat-loss plan needs to include at least six meals a day. These are small meals, but they should be eaten every 2.5 hours or so. If you eat the way most people do—maybe two or three times a day—your metabolism essentially goes to sleep. When you finally do eat, your body isn't processing it efficiently.

If you eat every 2 to 2.5 hours, your metabolism stays active. Every time food comes in, it processes it quickly and efficiently, especially fat. Plus, because your metabolism is constantly running, it requires energy, which means it burns calories just to function, reducing the need for extra intense workouts to burn calories.

So, I'll be doing six meals a day, with about 42 grams of protein per meal. That's roughly 250 grams of protein daily and a maximum of 150 grams of carbs...

My carbs will come strictly from rice and veggies. For protein, I’m sticking to chicken breast, cheese, and eggs.

I’m cutting out bread for these 6 weeks. I don't drink alcohol anyway, and let's face it, it's a big no-no... sweets are also off the table. I plan to drink 4 liters of water a day. Hydration is vital for an active lifestyle—since training and nutrition really just go hand in hand—because it helps deliver nutrients directly to your cells. Plus, water helps flush out toxins through regular urination. It also keeps your skin looking elastic. Serious bodybuilders use hydration to prevent skin issues when gaining mass. Other athletes know that staying hydrated helps cushion the joints, which lowers the risk of injury.

Fruit is fine, but don't overdo it because of the sugar and carb content. It's best eaten during your first meal of the day.

Make sure your last meal is at least 2.5 hours before you hit the sack.

Hitting the gym 4 times a week for 45 to 60 minutes should be plenty.

The goal of a regimen like this, whether it lasts 6 or 12 weeks, is to drop body fat... but it's also about switching your metabolism into a different gear. You're basically teaching your metabolism to work more efficiently. Once you hit that point, you won't have to obsess over every single bite because your metabolic efficiency will be boosted by at least 100%...

In any case, ask a trainer to sit down with you and explain why nutrition matters so much. Also, having someone show you how to perform exercises correctly is incredibly important. Sometimes even a slight shift in your posture can be a real killer for your health.
Whatever anyone else says, one thing is absolutely certain... there are three distinct ways money flows in...

1. The paycheck you get when you're working for someone else
2. The income you manage yourself if you run your own business
3. The cash coming in from your investments

It would be great to have all three sources hitting your account. Ideally, you'd live solely off that third one. But make no mistake, if you're relying strictly on that first option, financial freedom will always stay out of reach...

Job stands for Just Over Broke

Job stands for Just Over Broke
I really dig your plan. I’m totally on board with your goal to pay off your home as fast as possible—that’s actually my main focus too. Personally, I think it makes more sense to prioritize paying down the roof over your head while using maxed-out credit for everything else. It just gives you that extra bit of breathing room if things ever get rocky...
But honestly, for some people, just saving their money is a better move than starting a small business... because without any experience, they'd probably just blow through all their cash in no time.
Sunday shifts? in Economy ·
Betty Bennett10 said:I’m curious if anyone here who supports Sunday shopping would actually be willing to boycott a mall if it turned out the employer there was violating labor rights?

Hold on, so you're saying customers should protest because employees are working Sundays and overtime without getting paid properly?

When we see workers organizing themselves to speak up and doing everything in their power to stop being exploited, then we as customers will step up and support them...

But if not a single worker takes action, signs a petition, or asks for a meeting with management and their Labor Union representatives... if they just grumble but choose to stay in those roles anyway, then there’s really no point in someone else fighting that battle for them...

So, I think the better question is... how many workers who refuse to work weekends or overtime without fair pay will actually take the necessary steps to bring this abuse to light through the legal system, or use pressure from Labor Unions to force management toward decent changes (without all the drama)?

We'll be right there to support them when they do...

Personally, I don't buy anything from Gap, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, or any of the other huge companies known for using sweatshops and cheap labor—often exploiting immigrants without providing basic workplace safety...

Like that news story from a few years back about a McDonald's worker who fell into the meat grinders... since shutting down the processing line would have cost too much money, that worker ended up in a customer's meal...
Sunday shifts? in Economy ·
Betty Bennett10 said:Exactly how many Sundays a month does your wife work in healthcare?

My cousin works in medicine too, and of course, she covers holidays and Sundays, but it’s definitely not every single Sunday, nor is it every federal holiday. On top of that, those shifts come with premium pay—really good pay—so those extra duties actually help her build up a decent salary...

My husband also pulls some Sunday shifts from time to time, which is totally standard for his line of work. But again, he isn't working every Sunday, and he gets special pay for those days, just like he gets overtime for every single extra minute he puts in.

My wife actually works almost every Sunday because she prefers having one specific weekday off, along with Saturdays.

Everything you mentioned should apply to all workers, too. It's not like people at big shopping malls or retail hubs are forced to work every single Sunday. And naturally, they should be paid better for it.

Things like this should be regulated properly rather than just banning everything outright...
Sunday shifts? in Economy ·
Billi said:I’m against silly bans, personally. But starting next week, I’ll have to plan every other Sunday all by myself—with my sister, my mom, or whoever... since my partner has to work. It’s a bummer.

It’s good that you aren't a fan of those bans. I'm sorry you won't get as much time together, but I'm sure you understand the situation. If a husband really has the freedom to choose, he could just find a job that doesn't require working on Sundays instead...

Just to reiterate, my wife works in medicine. In that field, you know from day one that terms like "Sundays," "holidays," or "Christmas" just don't exist...

If she doesn't want that kind of schedule, she can always switch careers... though I bet she wouldn't complain if some foolish politicians (who are basically brainwashed by the church) passed a law banning her from working on Sundays...

Or maybe her work is somehow less important than retail, so she isn't "worthy" of having the legal right to hike Mount Rainier? Maybe I should ask Milwaukee about that...
Sunday shifts? in Economy ·
Milwaukee said:Do you work on Sundays? And under your rule, who would actually get a day off? You realize judges have backlogs lasting two or three years? A whole mountain of cases goes stale just because they don't have the time to clear them. They don't work Saturdays or Sundays. If they worked just 10% more cases, people would actually get their turn. Why is one profession considered more valuable than another to justify not working Sundays? Think about how long people wait for a hospital appointment, or why Congress wouldn't work on Sundays. They aren't even around during the week anyway. Why can't roadwork be done on weekends instead of weekdays when the city traffic is already a total nightmare?


You just don't get it. My freedom to choose my own work schedule has nothing to do with someone else's freedom to decide when a shop owner opens their doors, when a customer decides to shop, or when a worker chooses to do their job. The bottom line is that everyone should have the freedom to choose...

As far as I'm concerned, I'd love it if everyone could pick at least three or four days a week to take off by choice. As an employer, nobody has the right to tell me when to trade. As a consumer, nobody can tell me when to buy. And as a worker, nobody can tell me whether I'll work on Sunday or not... unless it's dictated by the free market of supply and demand.

And why does that specific day have to be Sunday? Why couldn't it be, say, Wednesday?

If judges won't work three or four days a week, then go become a judge yourself and work seven days straight to clear those old cases. Or become a highway worker and fix the roads...

The point is freedom of choice... in a free market, the laws of supply and demand will regulate efficiency or inefficiency. The real question is whether we want to allow a system of freedom like that, or if we're going to suppress it with primitive laws.
Sunday shifts? in Economy ·
Jeremy Flores10 said:I was scrolling through the news yesterday and realized just how pathetic people can be. As soon as stores opened up, huge crowds swarmed the shops on those little weekend getaways. Whether it's heading to the mountains or just a quick trip to the suburbs, we have stores open on Sunday now! You see these crowds rushing out with maybe two items in their bag, acting like it was an absolute emergency. Like they absolutely had to buy it today or they'd drop dead if they waited until tomorrow. Okay, sure. There are definitely times when you really need to grab something. I've definitely had those moments where I ran out of bread on Saturday night and needed it for Sunday morning, so I dash to the store early. But going out to shop for shoes, clothes, or toys? You'd have to be out of your mind...

You’re basically just calling someone else's lifestyle "sick." That's a pretty ignorant way to look at things. Why does it matter if someone just wants to pick up two things at the store? And it doesn't bother you when half your family heads to a pub to grab a beer on Sunday, even though your cigarette smoke is choking the waiters who might not even smoke.

Why do you care how people exercise their own freedom of choice, as long as they aren't infringing on anyone else's?

Who gave you the right to morally judge another person based on whether they choose to work or shop on a Sunday? You essentially just granted that right to yourself, which, like I said, is a classic trait of an ignorant person...

If I decided I didn't want to do anything on a Wednesday, then according to your logic, I could call everyone who works or shops on a Wednesday "mentally ill." Now *that* would actually prove there's something wrong with my brain, but not yours...
Sunday shifts? in Economy ·
Exploiting workers is a mess, but the solution is regulation, not bans. We need laws that ensure employers pay overtime or premium rates for weekend shifts... rather than just banning work altogether.

People have the desire and the need to shop on weekends, and retailers have the desire and need to trade then too. We should bridge those two sides and make sure everyone has the right to either shop or sell...

And as for the worker... look, if an employee doesn't want to work the way a private business needs them to, they should consider a career change or start their own business to set their own schedule. I'm not saying exploitation is moral... it's just that I don't go into someone else's house and tell them when to use the restroom or what color carpet to pick. If I'm unhappy that the company I work for operates on Sunday and occasionally expects me to be there, I’ll find a different profession or a different job, just like Ronald Castillo5 says. A private entrepreneur must have the right to set their business hours; nobody should be able to take that away. The law should just guarantee that the worker also gets: two days off per week, or higher pay if they work those specific shifts.

Think about someone carrying a mortgage... would they rather work on a Sunday or lose their job entirely because of a ban on Sunday work?

There has to be a choice. A ban is just removing choice. Bans are usually pushed by people who aren't capable of actually fixing the current situation. It's much easier to just issue a ban than to actually step inside a house and write some house rules...

The law was selective, foolish, and just plain silly...

Take my wife, for example. She works in healthcare... honestly, you all shouldn't get sick on Sundays just so she can have a day off, especially during holidays like New Year's or Christmas.

Once you enter that field, you know what to expect... you might get Wednesday off instead of Sunday, or something like that. In the USA, we have federal holidays, and for medical staff, those don't necessarily mean they get the day off, but they get those extra days to use throughout the year. Sometimes you might miss out on working a holiday, but you still end up getting an extra day off eventually...

Worker = Just Over Brok

JOB stands for Just Over Broke.

Why does everyone in America strive to be their own boss or an entrepreneur? It's so they can decide how and what gets done. If we choose to work for someone else... why complain? We can open our own shop and decide not to work on Sundays if we want... but once we see the competition pulling in a 35% weekly profit specifically on a Sunday... well, then we'll have to calculate how long we'll actually stay in business.