CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › wanderingmason37 › Posts

Posts by wanderingmason37

161 posts shown.

Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:Insults
Can someone please step in and deal with this "distinguished" member? It’s like he thinks he’s some protected species or something, just going around insulting anyone who doesn't see eye-to-eye with him.

Oh, come on, not Michael Adams2! He's just being himself.

We really need to get rid of these nasty trolls, led by Jalnuški and his whole crew of buddies from out of state.

They're totally ruining the vibe here.😳 😉
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:Here she goes again!!!
Good grief!
It’s like I’m speaking English and you’re over here talking in some weird dialect!!!
Start a thread about the trolls; I’ll jump in tomorrow morning to dive deep and back you up.
Dealing with Ink is my main priority right now and I'm handling it...
One thing at a time!!!

Chill out with the exclamation points and just get to the point 😁 😉

Now beat it 😳
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:Just wait, the trolls are gonna be next on the list...
They’re such easy targets because they have zero creativity and absolutely no substance...

And they're out there spreading the most backwards, primitive, far-right propaganda imaginable.

No—not Inquisitor2002! (I swear, I hate even having to defend him right now, but it's just the truth)

But those actual trolls, like JalnusGoTo and his whole crew...

Total trash with nothing to back it up, yet they write so neatly. They aren't even being crude! 😉
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:Look, I already said I’m sorry, and if I need to say it again to move past this, fine, I will. But honestly, I feel like you owe me an apology too for shutting down this thread.
I totally stood my ground on why I called out Ink.
The guy doesn't have even 10% of his posts without calling someone an idiot, a moron, or some other crap.
And honestly, there’s zero question as to why I’m asking for him to be banned, nor is there any mystery as to why he won't be. But the stuff I wrote? That stays in people's minds. Next time Joshua Evans9 tries to say something, people are going to be skeptical because he lied and actually admitted to lying.
Ink is also gonna be remembered as the guy who didn't bother answering my points and just tried to joke his way out of it...
But look at the thread—my arguments are right there, while all you've got is insults.
And we all know the deal: the one who resorts to insults is the one who has nothing left to say.

You just refuse to see that the issue isn't about being "insulting"!

Just watch how trolls operate; look at those typical internet agitators. They don't (usually) use explicit profanity. Look at how those slimy, disgusting types do it—they just use smirking emojis!

That's how they play the game these days.

Inquisitor2002 is just being crude. Fine, whatever, I once had a ban denied on my account because of being rude, too.

But in an online atmosphere like this—which you can't find anywhere in real life—this is just a harmless little episode.

Focus on the actual issues here.
😉

This thread would've been buried anyway, so if you felt personally targeted by my approach—sorry about that.
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:Buddy, you’ve got it all wrong.
Maybe that works for those "let's just let them see the light" campaigns where someone gets eaten up by $4 million in overhead...
I do things a little differently.
See, you have to put some skin in the game—your own time, your own effort. Money is the bare minimum anyone can contribute, but that's beside the point...
DICTATORRRRRR !!!!!


Like this:

If you’re actually an old-school forum regular—get it through your head right now: don't even think for a second that this place will EVER be as user-friendly or nice as it used to be.

I gave you a few examples of why, and yet you started coming for Inquisitor2002, who barely even posts and isn't problematic at all / and last year he was actually quite helpful.😁

The trolls have completely taken over this place. It's impossible to tell who's a local troll and who's just some random person from overseas or if it's all just one big group.

And honestly, you should probably watch how you talk to people in the future, too.

Being rude is the least of your worries.

--

👋
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Joshua Evans9 said:Just give me the account number and the name of the organization. Once I make the payment, it's done. There's no way I'm posting my private info here on the forum.

😁Seriously though,
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
vjetro_M_pir said:Look, if you’re actually trying to be sincere about this, I don't think the public needs to be in the loop... Unless, of course, you're doing this just to satisfy them.

😁
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Łipi.hr said:http://67.18.37.16/505/198/emo/spliff.gif

Man, we seriously need to legalize this stuff 😳
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:And this applies to absolutely everyone:

6. Drasticly veering off-topic (spamming, trolling).

6.1. Breaking this rule results in a temporary account ban, but only after the user has been warned twice for violating this specific rule.

🙄 Honestly, I'm totally down with that 😬

but they're all guilty of breaking every other rule on the list

except for Inquisitor2002. I can personally vouch that he has NEVER pumped out massive walls of text or spammed anything here.😳

🥳
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Joshua Evans9 said:Cut down on the white stuff!

Seriously, have you no shame?
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Joshua Evans9 said:I’m always straight with people. Well, except for that one time... but I actually owned up to being a bit shady during a debate about a poster.

Here's some rain for ya!

😁 😁
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:Rules in general...

oh please, screw the rules! #$%#"/&?!!😁

Why even bother shouting into the void here?

First thing you know, someone's gonna come along and take out the jealous types and this moody little kid too.

Look, I'm not scared of any rules 🥳 I'm definitely not some coward or a poser like these so-called "tough guys" hanging around here.

Michael Adams2, chill out just a little bit.😳 😁
Please ban Inquisitor2002 in Close to Politics ·
Joshua Evans9 said:😲 😂 😂

👍

p.s. Revka... I'm not making threats here. Slimeballs don't make threats... slimeballs are just—slimeballs.

😁 alright, you don't have to be brutally honest right this second
Reason for ban / amateur / Simbe in Close to Politics ·
go2s said:The only way to actually deal with trolls is to just straight-up ignore them.

👍 👍

I am all in on this!

And I’m officially proposing >> IGNORE THE TROLLS

Front and center!

that jalnuškog
lipog (his trailer - his nicknames)
mess (when he's acting himself 🙄
a whole bunch of those North American trolls...

We'll give the Borgs a pass this time 😳 😁

friends, let's just IGNORE THEM!!!!!!!!!!! 😳 😳 🙂 😁 👍
Reason for ban / amateur / Simbe in Close to Politics ·
sooylent said:dustypilot22 treats patriotism exactly like how some guy treats humanitarianism.

👍 👍

Honestly, nobody is even touching this nasty troll. They’re just out here spreading their total nonsense—and you hit the nail on the head there—their fascist diarrhea (not to mention this clueless kid who decided to back them up, plus a few others from across the pond).

I still can't wrap my head around the fact that YOU got banned. YOU!... But hey, I guess that's just how the cookie crumbles. I'm speechless.🙄

Anyway, more and more people are ditching the New York Times forums, and you aren't the only one who's been kicked off (like Krcko or the Red Count..)

Those guys actually had more pride than I did, since I kept posting on Reddit even after getting banned.

I don't even know why bother, because every single word you type here just makes you look more unhinged when you're surrounded by people like this.

The mods seem pretty powerless, from what I can see. The chaos is worse than ever.

Cheers, soylent
👋
Lefties: Absolute Legends >> Let's Goooo! in Close to Politics ·
Carl Hill6 said:Man, seriously...
I love this part—"at your disposal."
I had no idea you could even phrase it like that!

Hey Carl Hill6, what neighborhood are you living in? Where on earth does such amazing talent grow? 🙄 😁
Lefties: Absolute Legends >> Let's Goooo! in Close to Politics ·
boldcobra4 said:Man, you wouldn't know real quality if Bill was wearing them. 😁

Holy crap, check out this absolute mess of a situation right here! 🙄 😁 😁 😁

Seriously, why haven't you picked up some manners from Europe yet? For crying out loud! 😳 😉
Lefties: Absolute Legends >> Let's Goooo! in Close to Politics ·
wanderingmason37 said:😲 oh, so you're just here on assignment too, huh? 😲 😁


Always on the job and ready to roll! 😳 😁 👍
Lefties: Absolute Legends >> Let's Goooo! in Close to Politics ·
Natch said:Look, if you’ve never even thought about shaving your legs, finding a husband will be a total breeze.👍

Nope. We definitely didn't break up over whether or not I shave my legs.😁

Btw, I'm a married woman, and at first glance, I totally seem like just another casual poster here.😳 😁 😉
Lefties: Absolute Legends >> Let's Goooo! in Close to Politics ·
Natch said:hehehe😁

What are you even laughing at? You really think those soft, natural blondes can't be tough-as-nails revolutionaries when they have to be?

Well, life’s got a funny way of throwing you curveballs! 🙄 😁