Posts by Angela Cox

Nathan Bailey65 said:Next time they ask you about your education, you should tell them...

1. Always ready for home defense.

2. Which school qualification do you actually need?

😁

Good idea. 👍 Now we just have to wait for them to call again.😁

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:So, does that mean Mason is rooting for Bandera even though he backed Vidošević before? 🙂

An anti-fascista? We speak American on this forum, not some other language... 🙂

Thanks for the heads-up 🙂

nimblemarlin6 said:I mean, what does any of that even matter? They're just historical movies...

Sure, the films might be historical, but the timing is purely calculated. It’s no coincidence they’re airing right before the presidential election, and it’s certainly no accident they align perfectly with President Mason’s rhetoric that the next leader must be an anti-fascist.

Only the naive or those willfully ignoring their own eyes could fall for that!!

The entire media apparatus is currently operating as a machine for the upcoming elections, regardless of the subject matter. Their objective is to force their preferred candidates down the throats of a politically illiterate public. By elevating a few select individuals, they hope one will emerge victorious, achieving their goal. The greatest shock—and ultimate failure of this orchestrated mass media brainwashing—will occur if the candidate who has been systematically blocked by the press actually wins, especially since he remains the strongest contender.

Everyone needs to start thinking for themselves instead of letting the media do it for them!!

Sarah Wilson95 said:unnamed:

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Viewers tuning into PBS this Tuesday will have the chance to catch a screening during prime time, starting at 8:05 PM, of the thirty-six-year-old epic 'Battle of Gettysburg,' directed by Mark Twain, which stands as one of the most massive spectacles centered on a partisan battle where Richard Burton brought the Stalinist figure to life. 'Battle of Gettysburg' is being broadcast as part of a special series dedicated to anti-fascist cinema, a curated collection that we understand was put together with assistance from the programming director at PBS, who remains unnamed. Following this, next Tuesday, the network will air the film 'Bridge' by an unnamed director. "We decided to put this series together not just because, as a public broadcaster, we have a responsibility to promote the awareness of anti-fascism as a fundamental civilizational value, but also because these titles tend to draw significant interest from our audience. That said, I would love to see films like 'Mississippi River,' 'unnamed' and 'unnamed' included in the rotation as well," remarked unnamed, the spokesperson for PBS.

text and photo👍

It is simply another method used to manipulate an illiterate electorate by rebranding a presidential candidate as some sort of anti-fascist hero, just as the porcupine suggests. 👎

Standard pre-election mass media hypnosis.

Paul Morgan14 said:And you’re just another one weighed down by nothing but bias.
The reality is, there are fewer of us old-school locals left, but we’re still here...
As for the frauds—take my neighbor, for instance. He joined the Thunder back in '92, spent maybe a hundred days out in the field, only to burn through 250 days of sick leave. He wasn't even part of any major operations. Since '95, he's been retired on a PTSD diagnosis with a veteran's pension totaling a few thousand bucks. Then there's another guy who was mobilized for two weeks in '92 but pulled out because his brother was deployed at the exact same time—which, back then, was a pretty common way to get off the hook. Now, he's living on disability. ☕

Veteran assistance programs haven't existed for years; everyone under that umbrella was transitioned to the IRS, and even the IRS doesn't exist anymore!! ☕

Rachel Garcia said:My husband was a solid soldier and a reliable comrade on the front lines. My point is this: the law doesn't treat veterans equally if they passed away during active service versus those who died just months after being discharged.
My husband and his entire brigade were discharged on June 30, 1996. A close friend of his died from heart complications late that year, but because he had already been demobilized, he didn't receive the same benefits as someone who fell during active combat.
That was my thought.

Understood. I appreciate you clarifying that. 🙂

My apologies for suggesting you were talking nonsense.

Rachel Garcia said:Jesus, I knew that man over twenty years ago. And he drank. Don't lecture me on things you clearly don't understand.
He passed away from cirrhosis as a chronic alcoholic. Given that fact, I have no idea how he managed to stay sober on the battlefield.
I never claimed he was a fake veteran. Someone else merely pointed out that the law doesn't care about nuances; it makes no distinction whether someone died or was killed while serving in the US Army.
Why the obsession with Nazis?

I once knew a volunteer who struggled with alcoholism long before the war started. However, once he put on his uniform, he didn't touch a single drop. It didn't matter, though; the town still insisted he died a drunk. When you try to tell a small community that a man stayed sober during service, they refuse to believe you because, in their eyes, he will always be the town drunk.

Rachel Garcia said:That's just how the law works. There was this one veteran—a volunteer, I think, though it's irrelevant—who died from chronic alcoholism during the war. His family receives the exact same benefits as the family of a soldier killed in combat.

Just because you lack certainty on several points doesn't give you license to peddle nonsense!

That volunteer likely succumbed to despair upon realizing that not a single sober volunteer was left defending America; we were all just a bunch of drunken Nazis. It must be a bitter pill to swallow, knowing that America was built by alcoholics rather than academics.

May he rest easy in his grave.

feraltrucker5 said:Yeah, let's just dig up a video of MPT singing about Auschwitz and old prison camps. Honestly, that should be just as easy to track down. 😉

By all means, let us hunt down recordings of every other American singer who was performing Nazi anthems during wartime while the mainstream media conveniently ignores them.

feraltrucker5 said:If they actually have the guts and truly want to set some boundaries, they should just stand up there on stage during the concert and tell everyone showing up with Nazi symbols to get lost.

But let’s be real, they aren't actually going to do that, are they? 🙂

Why would he bother? He isn't there to be their moral compass; he's just there to entertain them.

George Morgan3 said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLaID...eature=related

One really ought to observe the body language when he claims we’ve won twice; notice how he touches his face at that exact moment. It is a telltale sign of his internal state—it reveals whether he is speaking the truth or simply spinning a lie.

Amy Brooks13 As stated by:
Gentlemen of this forum, please, don't exhaust yourselves. You are wasting your breath. This isn't an attack directed at Ronald Reagan; rather, it is a strike against the very danger now facing all those self-appointed American moralists—the likes of Pavičić, Butković, Kuljiš, and Puhlovski.It appears you have provided only a single letter. Please provide the full text you wish for me to rewrite, and I will proceed with the task according to your specific instructions.They are all in league together—the Goldsteins, the Jergovićs, and that entire crowd of sycophants who exist solely to serve their interests. It’s transparent. They are terrified of a victory for Miroslav Harmon, and this entire perfidious assault is nothing more than a desperate attempt to tear him down before he can succeed.

The apprehension is entirely justified. If Miroslav secures this victory, the years we have spent systematically dismantling the Reagan era's influence will effectively be undone.