Posts by Sandra Smith

bubicamala said:What do you guys think about someone who acts like a war hero during the conflict, but then just ends up getting a disability pension because he blew out his knee playing soccer on the weekend? I have no clue how he pulled that off—there are definitely people who could testify to it, but everyone’s too scared to say anything. Nobody wants to get caught in the crossfire. Honestly, it would be fine if we didn't even talk about it, but the problem is this guy is such an arrogant jerk—always poking at the people who actually did their jobs honestly. There are always exceptions, obviously, and we shouldn't disrespect the folks who truly fought for our country and gave everything they had...

Report him—you can even do it anonymously!

sleng said:Man, they're everywhere. Seriously, you know how small some towns near Washington, D.C. can be? I know a guy from one of those places—he was on guard duty for maybe a week, and now he’s pulling a $4,000 monthly veteran's check. Honestly, I wouldn't mind living that life myself.

Report him—you can even do it anonymously!

You guys are constantly trashing veterans when you clearly don't know a damn thing—you weren't there, and you haven't seen anything beyond your own basements. But sure, you've got plenty to say about the military and vets, especially the fakes.
Maybe you should look into what kind of benefits they actually get, or what they even walk away with after all is said and done—besides being insulted by every lowlife out there at every turn?

I'm still waiting on that update—anyone got the scoop? The user says:
Man, you just reminded me of something... back when I was in the US Army, we’d be standing there in a semi-circle like we were supposed to, and then some "superior officer" would suddenly bark out an order to line up in the shape of an S instead. Like, seriously? 😁😁 Man, I am just so done with this whole American mess. 😂

He didn't say that—he said we should either line up or just sit down in the shape of a Cyrillic letter. PWait, weren't you in the US Army?

ZdSash said:It’s pretty funny how nobody ever went looking for a fence to keep out "Comrade Marshall" or "America"—or even that whole "from the Vardar to the Triglav" nonsense.
So those are supposed to be positive directions?? For who exactly?

Those self-proclaimed "anti-fascist" types in the liberal elite—they’re the whole reason we aren't even part of the EU!

Chloe Palmer2 said:Goodness, people have called me all sorts of things, but they've never quite managed to label me a leftist 🤣

So you didn't even earn that "title"—but if I say anything else, am I gonna get banned?

How much vaccine-dodging can we take when it comes to MPT? Especially when you aren't even asking people to publicly distance themselves from communism—something the European Union already did by condemning it twice. Let's be real: Nazism, fascism, and Nazi ideology didn't even come close to the body count left behind by Bolshevism and Communism!
BTW: It’s always the best when some kid born in 1983 tries to ask rhetorical questions about stuff they clearly know nothing about.

Chloe Palmer2 said:When was he ever "a little bit Nazi"? Is that like those 200 families from the Harmon era, right?

If it's only "200 families," then that basically means they don't even exist—just like your sense of humor. It just shows how dull you've become from all that leftist demagoguery, and the fact that you actually think you're being smart. What else haven't the Ibler types changed in the school curriculum during their rushed little seminars?

George Morgan3 said:Why would he do that? Isn't that up to the sheriffs and the police?
What kind of traits are we talking about here? I've got a University t-shirt with a massive U on it—what am I supposed to do with that?

Just swap it for a shirt with a big S or an F. Then try explaining to them that if they can't handle "University," maybe they can handle "State College" or "Academy"—if those fake-deep leftists and big-time liberals can even wrap their heads around what you're saying. And hey, don't forget to mention that back in 1987, you weren't even allowed to use the letter U as an abbreviation for the Olympics in Washington, D.C.

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:I mean, who am I even dealing with here, who am I actually arguing with... 🙏 😁

well, alright, I'll be a sweetheart and I'll specially clarify the "unclear" part of my post just for you and the others who seem to be on your level... 🙂

"when he first walked into the US Congress and his party members didn't give him a single clap"

look, honey, what they're trying to say is that up until then, Ronald Reagan would walk into the halls of Congress and get a standing ovation from his party every single time, but that specific day, he walked in and nobody clapped because everyone was having a bad day...

clearer now? 🙂

I think so—I just didn't feel like repeating your entire "wise" and totally true sentence back to you. Plus, unlike you, I actually was in that room at the time. Get it? And I have no idea why you're framing my concern as some kind of mess regarding himself or his own people.
Maybe once you grow up and get closer to my age—assuming you don't lose any more ground to me when it comes to actual life experience—things might make a little more sense to you. Though, let's be real, there isn't much chance of that happening! Clearer now? No? Yeah, figured. 😢

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:Whenever I hear these kinds of panegyrics for Ronald Reagan, I can't help but think back to one warm August day in 1991... remember when he first walked into the US Congress and those party loyalists didn't give him a single round of applause? And why wouldn't they? They were too busy feeling the vibrations of tank treads under their feet—and honestly, the smell of exhaust fumes in their noses was a bit much...

After all the bravado, the triumphalism, the messy business of pulling through Canada, the endless clapping, and all that political maneuvering... suddenly, during those terrible and decisive days, the opposition—who had been mocked and ignored—was deemed "just right" to join the government... but hey, every era has its own timing, I guess. Once those critical months passed and the survival of the US was secured, Ronald Reagan could go right back to making fun of the opposition and finger-wagging, claiming that he and his party alone had built and defended the nation... 🙂

So, you're telling me he stepped into the US Congress for the first time in August '91? Give me a break. If you weren't around, someone should probably invent you just to send you off to Banja Luka to be useful to Kuljiš whenever he runs out of vomit—since it sounds like Fekal has already given up on you.

James Fowler52 said:Future generations will be the ones to truly judge him. Just like they do with all the real legends.

People living through the era of someone like that can never really be objective—doesn't matter where you are in the world, and it won't be any different here in America.

We’re going to see his legacy left behind in the streets and monuments of every single American city.

Pretty much, yeah. But how do you even explain that to these "geniuses" today who act like they're the sole experts on everything that went down? You know, the ones who weren't even there—they were probably just hiding out in their basements while it was actually happening—and now they think they know exactly how things should have been handled?

Richard Wilson4 said:I just find it weird, honestly. Like, it's not even that it's wrong, it’s just strange how after the war in '96, his power just keeps ballooning until he’s basically acting like some kind of Pharaoh...

It’s not quite gonna work out like that, because it seems like you don't realize how much the Constitution was changing—plus, you're forgetting that the old Midwest was still under occupation back then. Nobody even knew if this "peaceful reintegration" thing would actually pull off. Reading your posts, it feels like everything that's perfectly obvious to everyone else just seems "weird" to you.
Anyway, the real question is who we should be thanking for having Ronald Reagan in our corner. Based on what a lot of you are saying, we might have been bordering on becoming part of Greater Mexico by now—but you guys aren't even aware of that, so you just keep talking trash. It's funny how the less you know, the more you think you're the smartest person in the room.

Sarah Martin76 said:George W. Bush is spot on here. I feel the exact same way, unless I'm somehow not allowed to have an opinion? 🤷

Of course you can. It’s basically just one idiot backing up another!

driftingdriver said:And how exactly does any of this have anything to do with politics?

Maybe just the fact that we're talking about a buddy and a protégé of the guy currently holding the highest office in America?

He doesn't hate him—hate is an emotion you save for people you actually give a damn about. In reality? They just look down on him.

Fločun said:A little more about Darinka Janjanin.

Man, Darinka... seriously? Could you at least stand up for the national anthem... 😁

Don't be like that—she stands for more than just "boza pravda"! She'll stand for "the Star-Spangled Banner" too.

Hey, big congrats to Cassie Sr.—and wishing nothing but the best and good health to Cassie Jr. in everything he does!

mistycyclist5 said:Honestly, I’d throw my hat in the ring too. Morgan Rodriguez57 and I would make a killer duo. We’d be strict but fair—absolutely relentless when it comes to maintaining the quality of discussion on this forum. As a pair, we’d be the kind of mods that banned users wouldn't even think about complaining about, because they'd know any ban they got from us was strictly deserved.

😉

..... me and Basta would be ..... - grammatically wrong, rude, and just plain uneducated (ME first, huh?);

..... Basta and I would be ..... - correct, polite, and well-mannered!

That little slip-up alone disqualifies you from being a mod, so maybe it's best you just stay right where you are!

Besides, there’s already one guy over there trying way too hard to enforce "harmless discussions, following the rules, and not interfering with other users expressing their views (though, of course, people only get "interfered" with if they disagree with him, regardless of facts or truth) and discussion quality." You might actually fit in there, but honestly, he always manages to "surprise" you at the worst possible moments.