hiddeneagle98 said:We really need to dig into who’s actually behind that claim and where they’re getting their funding from.
A "century-old dream," huh? Give me a break. Russia was cut off from Europe by the Iron Curtain for half of that entire century while everyone was busy dreaming that little dream.
And let's get one thing straight: the US isn't the only one selling gas. Not even close.
The reality is that the US acts as a shield protecting us from Russia, which is exactly why it becomes such an easy target for this kind of mindless propaganda.
The US provides that security regardless of whether you're buying your gas from Qatar, Norway, or Algeria, for instance.
For the US, the profit margins on gas are a tiny, insignificant fraction of the GDP—it's hardly worth getting dragged into these kinds of messes. It's not about the money for Americans; it's just Russian propaganda trying to frame it as if the US is fighting them over gas profits. For the Russians, this stuff represents a third of their GDP, so it's huge for them, but for Americans, it's pocket change. What matters to the US is making sure Russia doesn't get access to the cash that fuels their military and their Cold War-style operations against the West.
By cutting Europe off from Russia, those guys lost a guaranteed stream of income. Their whole "dream" of using energy, corruption, and bribing politicians to slowly simmer away European stability has fallen apart. Europe finally realized what was happening and jumped out of the pot before they got burned.
So, you click the link, follow the footnote, and where does it lead you? It leads straight to a tweet from Aaron Mateo—that piece of Putin-affiliated trash and an apologist for the world's most heinous criminals and dictators, a subject I have already spent far too much time dissecting over the last two years regarding the Syrian conflict. Does anyone take this individual seriously, or is it just the absolute #####, including the author of this very text?
Mateo cites a statement by Blinken, which, by the way, he has conveniently stripped of all context; for in the actual statement, Blinken argues that this represents a massive opportunity to finally break free from Russian energy once and for all, thereby stripping Putin of his ability to weaponize energy to further his imperialist agenda, while noting that while strategic opportunities will emerge in the coming years, we must do everything in our power to ensure that ordinary citizens across the globe aren't the ones left footing the bill for this transition. In short, the sentiment is the polar opposite of what this text claims the statement implies.
Is it really so difficult to realize that Mateo is notorious for fabricating and peddling the most idiotic conspiracy theories imaginable? Any journalist worth their salt should see through him immediately, yet apparently, there is a distinct lack of serious journalists left in our midst.