Local PD
in Law ·
David Smith4 said:Honestly, you just have to strike them—break every bone if necessary—rather than trying some fancy leverage technique or whatever else... it’s a good thing they didn't suggest just shooting him on sight immediately, right? I can't tell if this was written by Kirk or if it was somehow added later as an important note, but from where I'm sitting, a blunt strike is anything but "minimal force."
I only brought it up because everyone seems obsessed with using leverage or specific holds, when according to the law, a physical strike might actually be the required response. Maybe the officer misjudged the situation? But I mean, trying to apply a technical hold on some drunk, aggressive punk... that's just asking for trouble.
D. The amount of force used has to be proportional to the severity of the offense and the specific legal goal being pursued (basically, use the least amount of force necessary to get the job done)
I think you’re totally misreading how the law actually works—I mean, just because strikes are listed first doesn't mean they're the go-to move. It's just a list of options, not a step-by-step manual, you know? You really have to look at it through the lens of section D.