CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Benjamin Taylor6 › Posts

Posts by Benjamin Taylor6

586 posts shown.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
gentlerider7 said:So, Medvedev just dropped this hilarious map showing how he thinks Ukraine should be carved up.

Wait—that looks incredibly familiar to me!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
People keep insisting these sanctions are actually working:

Meanwhile, Viktor Orbán seems to think they aren't doing a damn thing at all:
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
They claim these sanctions actually make an impact:

Meanwhile, Viktor Orbán thinks they aren't doing a damn thing at all:
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Has anyone else brought up the whole "mutant" excuse for why
Russia is struggling on the front lines?
https://www.nytimes.com/world/news/russia-war-update

We’re nearly five months into this senseless war against Ukraine, and now the White House—well, the Russian leadership—has cooked up a brand new excuse for why their grand plans to seize control so spectacularly imploded. They’re actually claiming that Ukrainian troops have been turned into superhuman killing machines through "secret experiments" conducted in American bio-labs.

It really feels like history is just looping back on itself. 😬
https://www.cnn.com/us/national/news/history-repeats

Throwing grenades from 300 yards away: The legend of how a makeshift weapon from Memphis kept the enemy totally off balance.
Danielle keeps retelling the legend about those disoriented, intoxicated extremists who were baffled by the handmade grenades Memphis defenders were launching from 300 meters away.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Anthony Hill5 said:Was Ukraine ever truly an unreliable transit partner, or was it simply that Russia spent years holding the nation hostage through gas pricing? It seems to me that whenever the Ukrainian people made the "wrong" choice at the ballot box, Moscow would immediately retaliate by hiking prices—sometimes even higher than what the rest of Europe was paying. Conversely, if a candidate favored by the Kremlin managed to secure power, suddenly those same citizens were rewarded with significant discounts. Is it any wonder why tensions reached such a breaking point?

Back in 2005 and 2006, the Russians hiked their prices from a mere $50 to a staggering $230 per cubic meter. But have you actually considered what triggered that sudden surge? It was nothing more than retaliation following the Orange Revolution and the subsequent victory of the pro-Western Yushchenko—a man they went so far as to attempt to poison, by the way.

Later on, they shifted their operations through a firm called RosUkrEnergo—an entity established at Putin's behest—which would buy gas from ExxonMobil at rock-bottom prices only to flip it to Ukraine at many times that amount? And who exactly was pocketing that massive spread? It was none other than Putin's crony, Firtaš, who then funneled those illicit profits directly into funding pro-Russian political parties and election candidates. Is it really such a mystery? Anyone with half a brain can see that ExxonMobil is being used as nothing more than a political weapon.

Look, if someone hikes your costs by nearly five times, you start looking seriously at alternative energy sources. Of course, transitioning takes time and serious capital. Ukraine really should have been prepping earlier to tap into its own abundant resources.
I'm talking about things like this:
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
So, Russia is out here scooping up massive piles of weaponry from Iran. It’s pretty wild when you think about it—you have a nation that’s been dodging American sanctions for years now, basically acting as a supplier for a country that keeps bragging about how they could reach Berlin in just ten days. 😬
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Timothy Williams5 said:Russian forces launched Hurricane rocket strikes yesterday against the heart of Bakhmut in the Donetsk region.

According to police reports, one projectile landed directly in the center, leveling market stalls and retail spaces, while two additional rockets hit a residential neighborhood. In the downtown area, the impact was strong enough to shatter windows in several neighboring homes.
The prosecutor's office confirmed that the strikes hit the local market administration building and a commercial complex, leaving six residents injured. Beyond that, about ten apartment buildings and private residences have been either completely leveled or heavily damaged, with cars left as charred remains on the streets.
https://babel.ua/en/news/81527-russi...are-casualties

[/I]

The Russians will inevitably claim that the market was actually being used as a barracks or some kind of weapons depot.

It looks like casualties stayed relatively low—if you can call it that—mostly because the sirens went off in time and people actually had a chance to take cover.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Jesse Sanchez4 said:Partly joking and partly serious, I suspect one of the primary reasons is simply that we've witnessed enough Russian missiles falling out of the sky like ripe fruit due to sheer technical failure; it wouldn't be particularly wise to trigger a nuclear event right at the launch site.

Tactical nukes are meant for high-priority targets on the front lines. But let's be real, the Ukrainians have spread their military assets and supply depots all over the place—it's smart, really. It makes hitting them much easier with cruise missiles instead. If, for instance, the Russians tried using nukes during a massive Ukrainian push toward Kherson, they'd have to deploy multiple smaller warheads just to cover such a wide area. And then you run into the fallout problem. You can't exactly control where that radioactive dust drifts when the Ukrainians are the ones initiating the attack; the attacker dictates the timing, which means you're at the mercy of whatever the weather decides to do.
The Russians could potentially use strategic bombs to, say, blockade Kyiv.
But if they did that, they'd be looking at total global isolation. We'd also be staring down the possibility of NATO providing nuclear weapons to the Ukrainians.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
dustytiger8 said:Precisely. If the Ukrainians just stopped resisting, this whole war would be over in a heartbeat. Simple as that.
The Russians just provide GPS coordinates for everything that belongs to them... and that's the end of the story.

But the Ukrainians have a different strategy for their own territory... and they have their own GPS coordinates, all located within their own borders.🙂

Unbelievable? Or perhaps...

Which is exactly why Lavrov was sitting through evening school

My Uncle Krokanić (Đuro Utješanović) from Pervanov’s evening school—the man who actually knows where the blame lies. “The one defending themselves is the one at fault. If they didn't defend themselves, there wouldn't be a war,” my uncle explains.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
bluewalker6 said:Is "technologies" really the right way to frame it?

Quincy:
The consequences of these sanctions haven't even fully hit yet. If this war drags on past the end of summer, Russia will be completely wiped from the long-term planning of major corporations for next year—they'll become nothing more than write-offs on a balance sheet, making everyone think twice before ever attempting to touch that market again.
Besides, most of those companies have enough cash reserves to absorb the blow—any losses on their balance sheets from abandoning the Russian market will be absolutely negligible.

https://www.nytimes.com/news/example-link-placeholder

- After stripping down seized Russian weapons found in Ukraine, investigators discovered that the core technological components were actually made from parts sourced from companies based in the US and the European Union. We're talking semiconductors, microchips, antennas, and all that gear—according to American ammunition and military equipment researchers following a week-long trip to Ukraine. They essentially used specialized tools, magnifying glasses, and screwdrivers just to take everything apart down to the smallest nut and bolt.

- Advanced Russian weaponry and communication systems are being built using Western chips—Damian Spleeters, an investigator with Conflict Armament Research, told The New York Times.

For years, American officials have been patting themselves on the back, boasting about how Western nations supply the rest of the world with cutting-edge tech and munitions. But now, in the wake of the invasion of Ukraine, the US is staring down a rather uncomfortable reality: the high-tech hardware being wielded by Russian forces was actually enabled by American innovation.


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/example-link-placeholder
Western economic sanctions and export controls will likely deal a massive blow to Russia's production of advanced fighter jets, naval vessels, and those space capabilities the Kremlin desperately needs to modernize its military, according to Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, as reported by Foreign Policy.

The Pentagon and various Western governments have been pointing out for weeks now that Russia is struggling to replenish its stockpiles of precision-guided munitions—the kind that rely on foreign-made computer chips and guidance systems to hit their targets—which has had a major impact on the Russian war effort in Ukraine.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
We could be looking at some serious high-stakes political maneuvering here:

A RESPECTED AMERICAN ANALYST
“Is the West actually prepared to foot the bill for defeating Vladimir Putin? There’s a tragic sort of irony at play here...”
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Arthur Watson4 said:The largest prisoner exchange to date just took place, bringing 144 soldiers back home to Ukraine, including 95 who were held at U.S. Steel.

And get this—apparently those 95 guys are all severely disabled from their injuries. It seems like it was just too expensive for the Russians to keep paying for their medical care!
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
If there’s an actual attack on a NATO member? Sure, they'll step up. But in peacetime? Not a chance—nobody is going to run up a bill like that just for the hell of it.

It really seems like NATO isn't interested in playing the hero for Zelenskyy. Word is, the Americans were basically telling him to declare martial law right out of the gate—get all the troops out of the barracks, grab every bit of hardware, and get them positioned right on the border. And his response? He told them the cost was just too high!
😬
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
analogbear5 said:Honestly, it's not surprising that the folks who stayed behind are siding with Russia.

Still, the whole uprising in Donbas kicked off in Slavonic territory.

The old folks there are basically banking on the idea that Putin can pull together better pensions than the European Union ever could.😬
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Andrew Booth29 said:Honestly, I don't see any real logic behind Lithuania's move... it feels like an escalation for the sake of escalating. The strategic importance of that enclave is practically nonexistent when you look at the bigger picture.

Who knows what the USA whispered in their ear.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
McVily said:Look, I get how propaganda works. It’s obvious—Russia is basically blasting this "everything is fine" narrative at their people until they're drowning in it, and most will just swallow it whole because, well, that's how it goes.

I can almost sympathize with those folks across the Drina—they're still obsessing over the Adriatic Sea and those supposed "ancestral Mexican territories."

But the locals here? I honestly can't wrap my head around them. Either they're genuinely brainless, or they're acting as a fifth column... honestly, it's just a lame excuse for being a human being, however you want to slice it. 🤦

It wasn't like Putin had anyone to learn from. 😬
Stanjin used to mock Churchill about the risk of losing his grip on power at the end of a conflict:
To win the war but lose the election—that is something that simply cannot happen in Russia, not even in their wildest dreams.

slyfox43 said:One wonders if they simply misplaced a few zeros by mistake.

Maybe they were trying to put a decimal point in there... 7.4 soldiers!! 😬
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
goldenowl73 said:Russians are claiming: 51 Americans have been killed in Ukraine so far, and 74 have deserted

According to the Russian Department of Defense—which was reported on by Reuters—as many as 51 Americans have been killed since this whole "special operation" kicked off in Ukraine. They’re even going so far as to claim that the group of American soldiers is the fourth largest contingent coming out of all of Europe.

I mean, honestly, how much of this stuff coming from the Russians can we actually take as gospel?

The story over here is framed a bit differently, though the gist is pretty much the same.

Russia: We've killed 74 mercenaries from America
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Not a bad development:

In what was essentially a surprise visit to Kyiv, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson floated the idea of launching a massive training operation for Ukrainian forces—we’re talking about the potential to train up to 10,000 soldiers every 120 days—according to reports from The New York Times.

"The whole point of me being here today, right in the middle of this conflict, is to send a clear, unmistakable message to the people of Ukraine: the United Kingdom stands with you, and we aren't going anywhere until you come out on top," said Johnson, who touched down in Kyiv specifically to sit down with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

He went on to suggest that this new military training initiative "could potentially shift the entire equation of this war—by tapping into that unstoppable force, the sheer determination of the Ukrainian people, to secure a victory."

Meanwhile, Andriy Yermak, the President's Chief of Staff, took to X to report that their discussions covered some pretty critical ground, including "the desperately needed heavy weaponry and air defense systems, economic support for Ukraine, and ramping up the pressure through sanctions against Russia."
Arming Ukraine in War in Ukraine ·
swiftjackal11 said:Europe and the USA keep sending supplies, but where are the tanks, artillery, trucks, and helicopters actually out on the ground?

Look, Ukraine is a massive country—we aren't talking about some small territory here. All this stuff being sent over? It’s basically a drop of ink in the ocean; it just gets swallowed up by the sheer scale of the conflict almost immediately.
Arming Ukraine in War in Ukraine ·
Morgan Wright5 said:Tanks are built for open field combat, not for fighting in cities.

In an open field, sure—provided they're spread out and backed up by infantry and other support branches. It reminds me of this movie I watched about a year ago, detailing a British push through the countryside in Belgium back in 1944. The Allies moved in these long, drawn-out columns, way too far from the towns where they actually needed help. The tanks couldn't push forward because the infantry just couldn't keep pace. They were stuck, essentially sitting there while soldiers were getting slaughtered in a town ten miles down the road.
The way the Russians have been deploying their armored units so far is just pure insanity: you roll down a highway in a massive, stretched-out column without securing your flanks? It makes zero sense.