CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › bluebadger3 › Posts

Posts by bluebadger3

2 posts shown.

Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4 in Political Scene ·
Bryan Edwards83 said:If it's sweltering outside and the building doesn't have great insulation, setting the AC to 72 won't actually keep it at 72—it'll probably feel like 74 or 75. Plus, if the units aren't perfectly maintained or low on refrigerant, they struggle even more... and then you have to consider room size, how many AC units there are, and how many people and computers are running, which all drive the heat up. So, I guess it feels a bit dictatorial for the top brass to set one temperature for everyone regardless of the specific conditions in each individual room.

As for how it feels personally, I'm definitely one of those people who prefers it cooler. I usually set my office to 72 or 75 because I can't stand the heat, and I seriously admire anyone working outdoors or in bakeries and kitchens during this weather.

Also, that night mode mentioned in the article—where the AC only kicks on if it's over 95 outside—doesn't make much sense to me. Inverter AC units actually use way less energy to maintain a temperature than they do to drop it. If it's 86 degrees at night, the temperature inside will spike so fast that the AC will end up using tons of energy in the morning to bring it back down, rather than just staying at 78 overnight. Of course, it depends on the equipment, but with old-school tech, it's pretty hard to save money while still keeping the offices at a comfortable working temperature.

If the AC isn't powerful enough to actually hit 72, you might as well just set it to 75. It doesn't really matter if you pick 65 or 72; if the room is sitting at 80 and the fan is on max, the unit is just going to run at full blast regardless.
2021/2022 School Year in Coronavirus ·
urbantinker8 said:It actually does matter, I think.☕
The guy just doesn't want his son to wear a mask for two minutes; it feels like he's just being difficult for the sake of it.
If someone is dealing with serious medical issues, a doctor would probably write them a note from the CDC or something saying they shouldn't wear one.
Everyone else can probably manage.
And this whole "shaming" thing after wearing a mask for just two hours... maybe it's even psychological.😉

Exactly, it’s honestly just a total joke to force her to wear that for two minutes. What’s even the point of doing that besides just being a blatant power trip?

Look, it could genuinely be an issue, or maybe the person is just being a psycho, but if something is actually bothering someone, why on earth would you keep forcing it on them?
Some people honestly think it’s perfectly fine to shove a dog right in the face of someone who’s terrified of them, or to tell someone struggling with depression that they should just "look on the bright side." I guess there’s some kind of payoff for wearing a mask, but honestly, what is it even worth? If someone actually has an issue with it, and you can't even prove that wearing one makes a tangible difference—especially in these mindless situations where you only wear it for two minutes before hanging out with the same group of people without any restrictions anyway—then what’s the actual point?