CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › silvermarlin24 › Posts

Posts by silvermarlin24

4 posts shown.

Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Anthony Taylor3 said:There you have it—you can see that the Russians are reliable, while this Western trash cannot be trusted.
That is precisely why Russia sought a security agreement; the West wouldn't even listen.
I'm glad we're on the same page.


I hope you keep putting all your faith in them 👍. That's definitely the "right" way to secure your country's future. I'm totally behind that logic 👍.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Anthony Taylor3 said:No, Russia didn't promise NATO wouldn't expand east, Russia didn't station missiles in Poland or Romania, Russia didn't lie about Iraqi WMDs, and Russia didn't back the main factions in Syria.
And they certainly weren't the ones organizing coups in the American neighborhood or installing neo-Nazis to burn people out.
That was the West, and the West is the party you can't trust.
The West loved the Chechens when they were busy killing Russians and leveling buildings in Moscow; back then, streets were named after Dudayev and Zakayev was given asylum. Now, everyone is panicking at the mere mention of Chechens.
It's precisely because you aren't willing to face reality that this is happening in Ukraine.
The world understands that Russia remains a desirable partner because they control the grain, the fertilizer, and the energy—exactly what everyone needs.
Let's be real: you can live without fancy makeup, a new car, or designer clothes. Living without flour and electricity is a much harder sell.

Of course not. They couldn't even if they wanted to—they aren't in NATO. You don't make "promises" like that; you sign treaties. Period.

Anthony Taylor3 said:No, Russia didn't promise NATO wouldn't expand east, Russia didn't station missiles in Poland or Romania, Russia didn't lie about Iraqi WMDs, and Russia didn't back the main factions in Syria.
And they certainly weren't the ones organizing coups in the American neighborhood or installing neo-Nazis to burn people out.
That was the West, and the West is the party you can't trust.
The West loved the Chechens when they were busy killing Russians and leveling buildings in Moscow; back then, streets were named after Dudayev and Zakayev was given asylum. Now, everyone is panicking at the mere mention of Chechens.
It's precisely because you aren't willing to face reality that this is happening in Ukraine.
The world understands that Russia remains a desirable partner because they control the grain, the fertilizer, and the energy—exactly what everyone needs.
Let's be real: you can live without fancy makeup, a new car, or designer clothes. Living without flour and electricity is a much harder sell.

They can't physically station them there. It would be crazy to try deploying stuff inside NATO member states. Instead, Russia put them in Kaliningrad and Belarus.

Anthony Taylor3 said:No, Russia didn't promise NATO wouldn't expand east, Russia didn't station missiles in Poland or Romania, Russia didn't lie about Iraqi WMDs, and Russia didn't back the main factions in Syria.
And they certainly weren't the ones organizing coups in the American neighborhood or installing neo-Nazis to burn people out.
That was the West, and the West is the party you can't trust.
The West loved the Chechens when they were busy killing Russians and leveling buildings in Moscow; back then, streets were named after Dudayev and Zakayev was given asylum. Now, everyone is panicking at the mere mention of Chechens.
It's precisely because you aren't willing to face reality that this is happening in Ukraine.
The world understands that Russia remains a desirable partner because they control the grain, the fertilizer, and the energy—exactly what everyone needs.
Let's be real: you can live without fancy makeup, a new car, or designer clothes. Living without flour and electricity is a much harder sell.

Nope.

Anthony Taylor3 said:No, Russia didn't promise NATO wouldn't expand east, Russia didn't station missiles in Poland or Romania, Russia didn't lie about Iraqi WMDs, and Russia didn't back the main factions in Syria.
And they certainly weren't the ones organizing coups in the American neighborhood or installing neo-Nazis to burn people out.
That was the West, and the West is the party you can't trust.
The West loved the Chechens when they were busy killing Russians and leveling buildings in Moscow; back then, streets were named after Dudayev and Zakayev was given asylum. Now, everyone is panicking at the mere mention of Chechens.
It's precisely because you aren't willing to face reality that this is happening in Ukraine.
The world understands that Russia remains a desirable partner because they control the grain, the fertilizer, and the energy—exactly what everyone needs.
Let's be real: you can live without fancy makeup, a new car, or designer clothes. Living without flour and electricity is a much harder sell.

True. They were doing their own decapitations.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
David Torres2 said:Did you even bother reading the page right before this one?

Yeah, I read the one before this.

wearytrucker22 said:Well, they need fossil fuels too. You’ve got to mine the uranium, ship the fuel rods over to Germany, and get the workers on site.😁

True. I totally missed that crucial part.😁
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
David Torres2 said:I don't get why everyone talks about the European Union like it's one single country. It isn't.
Every nation in the European Union is doing its own thing. Germany is phasing out pretty much all fossil fuels, while the Frenchmen just laugh at them and plan to build 14 brand-new nuclear plants.


I don't follow. You actually think a nuclear plant runs on fossil fuels?