Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5
in War in Ukraine ·
We don't even need to bring up nuclear weapons to cause a nuclear disaster on Ukrainian soil. A single conventional missile hitting a nuclear plant would trigger an even bigger catastrophe.
Based on what people are saying in the Russian media, they aren't buying Shoigu's claim of 300,000 mobilized troops. Looking at the scale of the calls for service, most are predicting the final number will land somewhere between 700,000 and a million.
This is a turning point. Either Russia ditches this regime, or this drags on for years.
Ukraine is entirely dependent on NATO arms deliveries and EU funding—essentially loans just to keep the state functioning. NATO and the EU can sustain this indefinitely if they choose.
Russia will either retreat into a total defensive posture in these regions using these mobilized troops—slowly losing the war over several years—or they'll try to push forward with these new forces to break Ukraine. In my estimation, if they go for the latter, they'll lose within a year. Then, we'll see a political collapse back home.
Based on what people are saying in the Russian media, they aren't buying Shoigu's claim of 300,000 mobilized troops. Looking at the scale of the calls for service, most are predicting the final number will land somewhere between 700,000 and a million.
This is a turning point. Either Russia ditches this regime, or this drags on for years.
Ukraine is entirely dependent on NATO arms deliveries and EU funding—essentially loans just to keep the state functioning. NATO and the EU can sustain this indefinitely if they choose.
Russia will either retreat into a total defensive posture in these regions using these mobilized troops—slowly losing the war over several years—or they'll try to push forward with these new forces to break Ukraine. In my estimation, if they go for the latter, they'll lose within a year. Then, we'll see a political collapse back home.