CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Melissa Gray2 › Posts

Posts by Melissa Gray2

5 posts shown.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Kate Cook27 said:That’s exactly why they push that angle: the idea that Ukrainians are second-class citizens. They argue they aren't a distinct nation, just a subset of Russians—and even then, they claim Russians are the elite descendants of princes while the others are just "primitive, provincial peasants" who lack intelligence and need "education." Some extremists from those so-called republics have even gone as far as calling for the total elimination of every "traitor" until the very end.
Where Putin is taking Russia is the direct result of his own hand. For years, his main goal has been crafting this image of a massive, powerful Russia under siege from all sides, positioning himself as the sole protector. He brought stability, especially to those haunted by the chaos following the collapse of the USSR. Out of fear that those dark days might return, people cling to Putin—because in unstable times, you pick what feels familiar. There's this constant, pervasive fear of an "external enemy" in Russia, and that fear makes it nearly impossible to see that the "protector" is actually the threat. Of course, while keeping the public in a state of perpetual anxiety, Putin worked hard to build his persona as a strongman through repression—silencing any opponent, whether they were politicians, journalists, or anyone else. Anyone capable of cracking that image was taken out. Personally, I think anyone truly dangerous to him is already dead, and those who are still around stayed alive for a reason. I don't really see Navalny as "opposition" in the traditional sense—he survived as long as he did for a reason. He simply wanted more than what he was allowed to have.
Putin has fully merged with the role now; I don't think he can tell where the man ends and the mask begins. Every public appearance is pure theater—he’s just playing the part. I don't see a bright future for Russia. You have to wonder about the youth—the ones who didn't live through the mess of the 1990s. They might not remember it, but their parents certainly do, and they’ve passed that trauma down. That's why so many young people in Russia are falling into an even deeper hole, and once that hole runs out, there's nothing left but the abyss.

Well, duh, they obviously want to tear it down. The whole NATO thing is basically just an anti-Russia project anyway; if things were different, they would’ve even let Russia join...
Kate Cook27 said:That’s exactly why they push that angle: the idea that Ukrainians are second-class citizens. They argue they aren't a distinct nation, just a subset of Russians—and even then, they claim Russians are the elite descendants of princes while the others are just "primitive, provincial peasants" who lack intelligence and need "education." Some extremists from those so-called republics have even gone as far as calling for the total elimination of every "traitor" until the very end.
Where Putin is taking Russia is the direct result of his own hand. For years, his main goal has been crafting this image of a massive, powerful Russia under siege from all sides, positioning himself as the sole protector. He brought stability, especially to those haunted by the chaos following the collapse of the USSR. Out of fear that those dark days might return, people cling to Putin—because in unstable times, you pick what feels familiar. There's this constant, pervasive fear of an "external enemy" in Russia, and that fear makes it nearly impossible to see that the "protector" is actually the threat. Of course, while keeping the public in a state of perpetual anxiety, Putin worked hard to build his persona as a strongman through repression—silencing any opponent, whether they were politicians, journalists, or anyone else. Anyone capable of cracking that image was taken out. Personally, I think anyone truly dangerous to him is already dead, and those who are still around stayed alive for a reason. I don't really see Navalny as "opposition" in the traditional sense—he survived as long as he did for a reason. He simply wanted more than what he was allowed to have.
Putin has fully merged with the role now; I don't think he can tell where the man ends and the mask begins. Every public appearance is pure theater—he’s just playing the part. I don't see a bright future for Russia. You have to wonder about the youth—the ones who didn't live through the mess of the 1990s. They might not remember it, but their parents certainly do, and they’ve passed that trauma down. That's why so many young people in Russia are falling into an even deeper hole, and once that hole runs out, there's nothing left but the abyss.

So Putin is basically the dam holding back the communists, who are the only real alternative to the current world order... and somehow, he's actually playing a pro-Western role in his own way...
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Kate Cook27 said:I was right there—saw it, heard it all.

Look, you could have been hanging out in Lviv without actually ever stepping foot on the front lines. It makes total sense that people fleeing to Lviv would pick up the language—they’re gonna need it to survive, right? Besides, if they started claiming they loved Russia, everyone would immediately flag them as foreign agents anyway... wouldn't they?
Back in Mykolaiv, things got pretty intense, with tons of locals getting detained just because people suspected they were leaking info.
Who knows how many "suspicious" folks have been taken out in those cities while the mainstream media stays completely silent about it...
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Megan Thomas5 said:Russ is absolutely reeling. They’ve got this massive fleet, yet they can't seem to get anything done. At this rate, they won't even be able to hold onto Crimea, and they'll be begging for negotiations just to keep what little they have left.

Honestly, nothing surprising about what went down in Crimea. Sabotage can happen anywhere, especially since Ukrainians are pushing toward Melitopol—where mobilization isn't even an issue—and you've got plenty of specialists being sent in by intelligence services... it was pretty much expected.
And even if they used long-range missiles, it wouldn't be such a big deal. You hit one target, so what? Russ fires a hundred of those things a day, and look how much progress they actually make...
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
rowdytiger13 said:That's because communism is an absolute utopia that can only function within tiny, isolated communes, mostly because it just doesn't mesh with human nature.
A person would essentially have to undergo some massive psychological evolution to reach a state of consciousness where they're willing to work themselves to the bone just to have the exact same resources as someone less capable or less intelligent—even though everyone would technically have enough.
For most high achievers, that concept is just fundamentally unfair.

Sure, but by that logic, capitalism isn't compatible with human nature either—it wrecks the environment through hyperproduction—so I guess we should just go back to feudalism? That's why the feudal system lasted for a thousand years, it made sense at the time...
dustyfalcon122 said:Actually, I think it's the exact opposite. The CIA learned their lesson long ago; they aren't going to throw out numbers they can't stand behind just to be reckless. They're aiming for the absolute truth, or at least as close as possible, especially on details that aren't even that critical. They definitely won't be lying at this stage.
That CIA number might actually just be the bare minimum, though I honestly have no idea how they even calculate casualty estimates when the war is mostly driven by artillery. Maybe through spies?

The CIA usually gives you the ceiling, not the floor; they aren't going to intentionally lowball the numbers. And that total includes the forces from the Donbas and Luhansk regions, which is where most of the casualties are coming from...
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Amanda Allen4 said:Why on earth would the older generation "naturally long for the days of the Soviet Union"?

My entire logic was that the USSR wasn't even a functional state to begin with, and nobody actually wanted to defend it—which is precisely why it collapsed. Nobody had to launch a military invasion against the USSR to bring it down.

It’s because communism is viewed as some kind of lost paradise, systematically dismantled by globalists. You can see it today—every single communist party has been effectively banned; there isn't a single one left on the ballot that actually campaigns against private property...