Posts by bluecyclist64

Sam Alvarez4 said:without further ado.
but.
Has it ever occurred to you that reading through endless details about desertion attempts and similar nonsense is exhausting and frankly quite tedious for everyone else, especially those of us on this side of the Atlantic?
Cheers.

I think I'll stop writing here. Seeing > is enough to remind me of his old commentary regarding southern Argentina.
I have no intention of arguing with Putin supporters over things I simply don't care about. 👋

Arthur Sanders74 said:I'm not so sure... what's the point in avoiding a debate just because you disagree with someone? Patting yourself on the back alongside people who echo your every word gets old fast. You need a bit of friction to spark a meaningful dialogue.

Jack Cook7 said:So, let me get this straight. I’ll end up dying alone in some ditch on a quiet night, nobody will even realize I ever existed, but eighty years from now, some bureaucrat will be raking in massive NGO checks from the "[My Name] Fund" just to finance the very people who tossed my body in that ditch?

Yes, I am aware that I can be exhausting with my so-called sense of humor.

PS: Maybe I actually enjoy it.

rowdytiger13 said:This isn't my scene anymore. I probably shouldn't say this out loud, but I voted for the Rukoslavov political shift with genuine enthusiasm, and if given the chance again, I’d do it even more gladly.
Best regards,

cosmicgull52 said:Wait, are you really going to let some third-rate Kremlin lackey kick you out of here? 😲

Come on, man, we've weathered worse storms than this. Take it from me: just hit the ignore button and send that pro-fascist garbage packing. Don't give him the satisfaction of those 2014 penalty points he earns with every single one of his posts.

Linda King said:There was a time when Jesus shared this particular parable with His disciples, and honestly, its relevance hasn't aged a day. He asked them a question that cuts straight to the bone: Can a blind man truly lead another blind man? If they try, aren't they both just going to stumble straight into a ditch? It’s a simple matter of hierarchy—a student isn't meant to be greater than their teacher, and once someone has mastered their craft, they eventually stand on equal footing with the one who taught them. But then He turned the lens toward our own failings, specifically how we judge others. It’s a classic human flaw, isn't it? We spend all our energy squinting at the tiny speck of dust in our neighbor's eye while completely ignoring the massive wooden beam lodged in our own. How can you look someone in the face and say, "Let me help you out and fix that little problem you've got going on," when you're practically blinded by your own glaring issues? He called it what it is: hypocrisy. His advice was blunt and practical: deal with your own massive shortcomings first. Only once you've cleared your own vision will you actually have the clarity required to help anyone else see straight.

Luke 6:39-42 I was sitting in a quiet corner of a coffee shop in Seattle the other day, watching people navigate their morning commutes, when I found myself reflecting on this specific passage from Luke. It’s one of those biblical segments that hits harder the older and more cynical you get. The text essentially asks: Can a blind man lead a blind man? The answer, of course, is a resounding no—they both just end up in a ditch. It’s a blunt, almost jarring metaphor for the lack of discernment we see so often in modern discourse. Then comes the part that really gets under my skin: the warning against hypocrisy. We spend so much energy squinting through our own lenses, obsessively picking apart the tiny speck of dust in someone else’s eye, while completely ignoring the massive wooden beam obstructing our own vision. It’s a classic human failing. We love to play judge and jury over the minor flaws of others because it provides a momentary, albeit hollow, sense of moral superiority. It's much easier to point out a neighbor's mistake than to face the structural failures in our own lives. In an era where everyone feels entitled to be a critic, this passage serves as a sobering reminder to check our own footing before we try to guide anyone else. If we haven't dealt with our own fundamental blindness, we aren't leading anyone toward the light; we're just stumbling together in the dark. ☕

Every society functions this way. It’s all just a massive sales pitch for an idea—whether that idea happens to be a religion, a national myth, or just a collective set of beliefs. Your frustration stems from the fact that Western societies are far more sophisticated at marketing their ideologies; because they are so effective, all you can really do is point out the manipulation and try to wake up the sheep. Go ahead and try. I actually appreciate it. On the flip side, when you look at places defined by poverty, misery, and blatant, vulgar aggression—that vertical aggression you mentioned—the subjects don't revolt. They stay obedient. The strong might get sidelined, but not through some digital shouting match on X; it happens much more directly in the real world. In these so-called "free" countries, the individual is nothing. They are trampled and degraded. People constantly invoke "traditional values," yet there is nothing pure or healthy left in them. It is all just Sodom and Gomorrah. It’s a grim trifecta that seems to haunt our society more than ever: alcoholism, violence, and deep-seated hatred. I’ve spent enough years watching the cracks in the American social fabric widen to know that these aren't isolated issues; they feed into one another in a vicious, self-sustaining cycle. I remember walking through a neighborhood in Chicago a few years back—just a quiet evening, or so I thought—until the sound of breaking glass and shouting drifted from a nearby apartment. It wasn't just a random outburst; you could hear the slurred, aggressive tones of someone who had clearly spent too much time at the bottom of a bottle. That kind of substance abuse doesn't just stay contained within the individual; it spills out into the streets, fueling domestic disputes and senseless acts of aggression. When people lose their footing to addiction, their inhibitions vanish, and that’s often when the underlying resentment and bigotry bubble to the surface. We see it constantly on X lately—people fueled by liquid courage or digital echo chambers, lashing out with vitriol that would make even the most cynical observer recoil. It’s a downward spiral: the booze loosens the tongue, the anger provides the spark, and the violence is the inevitable, tragic result. It’s a heavy reality to sit with, but we can't pretend these shadows don't exist. What else can you expect from societies that have already lost all hope? It’s an inevitability. In most developed liberal democracies, people naturally crave more—more stability, more prosperity, more agency. They aren't content with just surviving; they want to actually live. You won't find that kind of ambition in these godforsaken, satanic death traps where everything is just a struggle for survival.🙂No matter how much they might have considered themselves to be anything other than hypnotized...🤣).

TL;DR: To those of you who have finally lost your grip on reality—there is an alternative. But then again, none of you seem to have the backbone to actually take it.

Edit: shortened

Linda King said:Here is another one that complements the previous point:
I’ve been spending quite a bit of time lately looking back at the history of armored warfare, specifically focusing on how certain legacy tanks have transitioned from frontline combatants to mere museum pieces or, more frequently, scrap metal. It brings to mind some conversations I had years ago regarding the longevity of Soviet-era designs. There is a particular fascination with the T-55 series that seems to persist despite its age. When you look at the sheer volume of these machines still circulating in various conflict zones, you realize that while they are technically obsolete by modern standards, their simplicity remains their greatest asset. In a world where a single sophisticated drone can neutralize a multi-million dollar main battle tank, there is a grim sort of logic to deploying something rugged, cheap, and easy to maintain. It’s the kind of pragmatic, albeit depressing, reality of modern attrition warfare. I remember sitting in a small workshop back in the Midwest, watching an old mechanic struggle with a vintage tractor engine. He kept saying that "complexity is the enemy of reliability." That sentiment applies perfectly here. The T-55 isn't going to win a duel against an M1 Abrams in an open field, but it’s incredibly difficult to truly "kill" a fleet of them because they are everywhere and they are fundamentally basic. However, we shouldn't mistake ubiquity for effectiveness. We see this play out in current geopolitical shifts across Eastern Europe. As tensions rise between NATO forces and Russia, the sheer mass of these older tanks being pulled from storage becomes a significant variable. It's not about quality; it's about whether you can field enough hulls to saturate a defensive line before the opposition exhausts its precision munitions. It makes one wonder if we are entering an era where the most successful military force isn't necessarily the one with the most advanced technology, but the one that can best manage the logistics of high-volume, low-tech attrition. It's a wearying thought, but a necessary one if we want to understand the current trajectory of global instability. 😁

boldraven3 said:🤣🤣🤣

The prize goes to whoever writes that this is a false flag operation, because one country (cough, the USA, cough) effectively collapsed a long time ago; everyone is just keeping quiet about it.😲

Jack Cook7 said:Tell me more about Haiti, the legendary symbol of liberation from slavery, democracy, and capitalism. You know, the ones that had to pay France tens of billions of dollars just to be left alone.

Or look at Argentina. How they took out British loans immediately after gaining independence from Spain in 1821, and ended up owing money for two hundred years.

So where is the prosperity? If we abolish colonial impositions, who is going to be left hungry for bread?

Arthur Sanders74 said:Judo, what ever happened to Basta?
And what about Tupić?

rowdytiger13 said:We really ought to ask bluecyclist64 what the term is for when you finally manage to recover from all this media brainwashing. 🐔

rowdytiger13 said:I walked away feeling pretty heavy. It was like watching Vegeta try to make sense of a world that’s completely spiraled out of control—just total chaos everywhere you look. In the end, I felt like I lost all credibility just for being labeled some kind of "Putin-sympathizer."

Nicholas Watson said:I'm pretty easy to offend, 🕺
What can I even say to you?
I mean, it’s not like anyone can claim victory before the election is over. Then again, even after the dust settles, half the people won't even admit he lost anyway.

Just commenting on this guy's whining about the red card.
Who's afraid of Judah? Seriously, who fears Judah?
Three for a penny, three for a penny.
Babetina 🤣

Arthur Sanders74 said:Hold on, the uniforms look similar...

Just because I happen to look a bit like Brad Pitt doesn't mean I've been sleeping with Jennifer Aniston! 😬

Manchi, have you been stuck up north all summer? 😒

Anyway, I’m watching these Barack Obama supporters grinning ear to ear because Donald Trump was busy bombing ISIS supporters over in the Middle East. It’s enough to make you weep—seeing that Orange piece of trash dropping bombs and taking out leaders... excuse me, "human rights activists"!
Get lost, you animals! 😠

Meanwhile, the liberal media is doing everything they can to dodge Robert F. Kennedy. But he’s a true Democrat!
I sat through a few interviews recently... we really ought to give him a fair shake to actually express himself. 👍

rowdytiger13 said:
If I were gay, I’d support vegans to the bitter end, because compared to us—they’re the real deviants!🤣

The thing is, though, I don't really identify with the whole gay scene at all; I only see those hyper-performative types, like Ava Karabatić. But as for vegans? I can't even wrap my head around them. They are complete idiots.