The beginning of the end for "Life for Two" according to the local shopkeeper
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jose White18 said:Per editorial instructions, it’s either one or none. Besides, chat is strictly prohibited by the rules, though we might occasionally tolerate a single chat thread.2) On what basis are all three moved? They are labeled strictly as "chat" topics, yet anyone reading them can clearly see they aren't just small talk; people are discussing very specific issues like being a mistress, infidelity, or an adulteress.
How are those considered chats? 🤦3) How many regulars can be on a chat topic, and how many new people need to join within what timeframe before it's declared a "closed group"?
Do you honestly think there's an exact definition for that? Do you really think we have to reach a consensus on such a judgment?4) IF they actually meet objective criteria for being chats, why were all three removed at once, despite having totally different lengths, subjects, and communication styles?
There is no reason to remove them in the order they were created, nor is any one thread more significant than the others to warrant staying while others go. It wouldn't be right to show favoritism to one side over the rest.5) Where did this need for a violent, aggressive, and baseless intervention come from? These threads worked perfectly fine for years, drew people in, and ultimately helped them.
A violent and aggressive intervention would have been closing those chats entirely.
Because.
Don't you think that's a bit of a stretch? 🤷
And if the term bothers you so much, we don't even have to call it "chatting." ☕