Sam Green73 said:Do you actually have that text of yours?
If you do, just post it in an active discussion thread.
If you don't, you'll get it.
Don't start new threads just because they already exist as active discussions simply so your text can be the first thing people see.
Who are you addressing here—me or 52_9?
The points I’ve made don't exist anywhere else as an active topic. I synthesized several distinct issues and reached a conclusion that you clearly failed to grasp. You won't find any source claiming that a "PRIVATE BANK must have its own owner, even if that owner happens to be the Federal Reserve." That is my own deduction. It isn't exactly groundbreaking logic, yet when one observes that stating the exact same thing in a slightly different way is immediately branded a "conspiracy theory," one has to wonder.
History shows the world has been a victim of a few ultra-wealthy aristocrats since ancient times; that isn't some conspiracy theory, it's just a historical fact.
Look into this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_the_President_of_the_United_States
Barack Obama is nothing more and nothing less than a distant relative of three royal lines from the British Isles. Given all the data available on the internet, only a fool would continue shouting, "CONSPIRACY THEORY!!!" Such information belongs in the mainstream media because it is an integral part of it—the true part.
Everything I have written, in the specific format I presented it, cannot be found anywhere else. My text needs to be a new topic, regardless of the fact that you will inevitably delete it. If I were to post it within any existing thread, you would simply scrub it for being off-topic.