Posts by Nicole Martin87

Thoughts on this ATX EVGA Power Supply 500 w Retail?

I picked up this power supply a little while back—it’s been running for over a month now—and honestly, the price seemed just right... though I find myself hoping it actually delivers that 520W rating printed on the unit. The guy at the shop mentioned there are plenty of 520W options out there that are significantly better, but they come with a much higher price tag. I can't quite wrap my head around what the actual difference is... This specific model doesn't have many connectors—just two older generation ones and two newer ones, plus the 12V line for the motherboard and the standard 24-pin connectorhttp://www.chipoteka.hr/artikl/10344...er-520w-retail

Larry Ortiz5 said:I'm not so sure... in my experience, none of those PC optimization tools have ever been truly reliable—if anything, they just seemed to drag my system down even more. Personally, I stick to CCleaner and Defraggler, I uninstall anything I don't use, and I run regular scans with my antivirus and Malwarebytes... and honestly, the computer runs like a dream.

I personally rely on Norton antivirus http://www.avira.com/en/index.

Based on the testing I've seen, it’s arguably the best option out there—which is even better considering how solid the free version is. It can run on older, lower-spec machines without much trouble, too; it doesn't really bog down the system unless you're actually running a scan, and even then, the impact is negligible compared to other software... I'd highly recommend the free version of Norton. As for updates, they are incredibly lightweight—just a few kilobytes most days, with maybe one slightly larger update once a month or so.

Along with CCleaner, I also use some other utility tools here and there, though I find CCleaner to be quite subpar at times. I was having issues with games like Grand Theft Auto IV where the graphics would stutter occasionally... but after I cleaned things up using these tools and toggled the "game mode" settings in CCleaner—which, thankfully, doesn't reset your preferences when you close the game—Grand Theft Auto IV finally feels alive again. Everything is smooth... it runs like it's well-oiled.

As of right now, I have been relying on CCleaner—which has honestly proven to be quite effective—alongside CCleaner to track down those extra bits of digital clutter that CCleaner seems to overlook...

This software http://www.iobit.com/advancedsystemcareper.html actually offers quite a bit more in its free
version than what you'll find in any edition of CCleaner... though, if I had to be critical, I suspect CCleaner might still hold a slight edge when it comes to cleaning up the registry.

I was honestly quite surprised to see that CCleaner includes an option for addressing Security Vulnerabilities—that was definitely unexpected.

I have experimented with quite a few different system optimization tools over the years—programs like CCleaner http://www.tune-up.com/
, CCleaner, and Glary Utilities, among others... In my experience, CCleaner has consistently stood out as the most effective optimization suite out of everything I've tested so far.

Does anyone know of a truly decent free alternative to CCleaner or those other two? While Glary Utilities serves as a somewhat acceptable substitute for CCleaner, I am still searching for something better.

Benjamin King2 said:Look, audio quality stays the same regardless of how much raw horsepower your PC has—you just have to meet the basic CPU and hard drive speed requirements. It’s a different beast whether you're working with one channel or eight. Honestly, considering how old this card is, any hard drive from the last ten years is going to be more than enough for the number of channels and the sampling rate we're talking about here.

RAM matters for the software side of things—basically, you don't want your system swapping to the hard drive because you're low on memory and choking out the disk controller. You just need to make sure you meet the software's system requirements depending on which program you're running.

If I record one channel at a time, that implies a higher level of sound quality compared to recording all channels simultaneously—if I am not mistaken—for instance, when capturing sound from a keyboard.

Minimum PC Specifications:
Intel Pentium III 500MHz
128MB RAM
VGA graphics card, 800x600 / 256 colors
Windows OS

Recommended PC Setup:
Intel Pentium III 1GHz
256MB RAM
VGA graphics card, 1024x768 / HiColor
Windows XP

Minimum MAC Specifications:
G4 800MHz
256MB RAM
VGA graphics card, 800x600 / 256 colors
OS X

Recommended MAC Setup:
G5 1,8GHz
512MB RAM
VGA graphics card, 1024x768 / HiColor
OS X

The Sound Blaster card—well, the idea is that if you have a more powerful computer, you get better recording and playback quality... though, of course, a beefier machine demands more RAM to keep up. It really just comes down to ensuring you actually set the recording quality within your specific software—which, frankly, isn't always an intuitive feature on other sound cards. Please, feel free to correct me if my reasoning is off...

The Sound Blaster card started working perfectly on my Ubuntu 11.10 setup—I installed several different mixers, and eventually, either one of them finally triggered the audio or things just... clicked into place on their own.

I have to say, now that I am using this Sound Blaster, my perspective on music has completely shifted—recordings I previously thought sounded decent now seem quite poor by comparison, whereas studio-grade tracks offer a truly breathtaking level of quality...

With lower-quality recordings, the sound just feels stifled and thin.

Benjamin King2 said:Give it a shot—you honestly won't find anything comparable for under $100. $67The Sound Blaster card is way higher quality than the Entertainment version, even if it is basically old junk at this point.

I agree that the Sound Blaster is pretty much outdated junk at this point—though, for what I actually need to get done, it’s more than enough... I won't go so far as to call it "good," per se...

I finally managed to get my hands on a Sound Blaster card—it’s actually the exact one I tried out years ago, but this time the previous owner decided to upgrade to something more high-end... so here I am. The thing is, I'm running Ubuntu 11.10 at the moment. While Ubuntu recognizes the Sound Blaster hardware itself, there's absolutely no sound coming through... nothing at all. I even tried running it through Wine, which sees the card too, but still—total silence. Does anyone happen to know what might be causing this specific issue? I'd really appreciate some guidance before I spend too much time spinning my wheels on this...

Hello—I currently own a Creative Labs Sound Blaster Entertainment 5.1 card. I was wondering what your thoughts are on this specific card... I actually have another one with the exact same chipset. My main goal is to find a reliable card for audio recording purposes.

Would this be considered a decent option for home studio recording—for instance, if I wanted to record the sound from a keyboard?

I have previously had the chance to record using a Creative Labs Sound Blaster card, which might actually perform better than this Creative Labs Sound Blaster Entertainment 5.1 unit. If you have any recommendations for a superior card for both recording and listening—provided it stays within the budget of $33—perhaps an older model or even something newer, I would appreciate it. When my needs eventually require something more professional, I will likely invest in a dedicated studio interface. For this price point, it is hard to find a card with high-fidelity recording capabilities, but perhaps there is a hidden gem out there somewhere...
The Creative Labs Sound Blaster Entertainment 5.1 seems to work with drivers from C-Media sound cards, which I have already tested.

Card Specifications

Creative Labs Sound Blaster 5.1 PCI - Technical data Bookmark and Share

Compatibility

DirectSound / 3D
DirectX Audio
DirectX Audio, DirectX Audio
DirectX Audio
DirectX Audio
Microsoft
DirectX Audio
DirectX Audio
DirectX Audio / Pro
AC'97
PC 2001
PCI Bus Specification 2.1, 2.2
PCI Bus Specification 1.0

Digital Audio

8/16 bit recording & playback at up to 48 kHz (mono/stereo)
Extended full duplex stereo for recording & playback (mono/stereo)
Record and playback all audio sources
Microsoft
DirectX Audio
DirectX Audio
DirectX Audio

Audio Mixer

Individual level controls for all audio sources

External Connections

Digital output, optical, 44.1 / 48 kHz (TOS link)
Digital input, optical, 44.1 kHz, 48 kHz (TOS link) ! Windows 7 - 48 kHz only !
3 line outputs, stereo (3.5 mm)
Line input, stereo (3.5 mm)
Microphone input, mono (3.5 mm)

Onboard Connections

CD audio input, stereo (MPC3)
Aux In, stereo (MPC3)

Drivers

Windows OS

ControlPanel

Windows OS

Scope of delivery

System requirements

One free PCI 2.1 compatible PCI slot

Intel Pentium II or AMD K6 II 500 or higher

64 MB system memory

Screen resolution of at least 800 x 600, 16-bit color

CD-ROM drive / DVD-ROM drive (for the DVD Player)

50 MB free hard disk space

Regarding my question about $66 how much better this card is compared to the Creative Labs Sound Blaster Entertainment 5.1...

http://www.amazon.com/creative-labs-sound-blaster/

Manufacturer

Creative Labs

Warranty

12 months

Model

Creative Labs SB Audigy SE PCI, BULK

Interface

PCI

Channel count

64-channel reproduction with independent sample rates

External connectors

Digital Audio I/O, AUX Audio input

Internal connectors

Line level output (front / side / rear / center / subwoofer) or headphone output, Line input / Microphone input

Additional features

24-bit analog-to-digital conversion for analog input at a 96kHz sample rate; 24-bit digital-to-analog conversion from a 96kHz digital source to the analog 7.1 speaker output; 16-bit and 24-bit recording with sample rates of 8, 11.025, 16, 22.05, 24, 32, 44.1, 48, and 96kHz