casualorca5;55496240 said:
cosmictinker24 said:So, I get it.
I'm not recording this interest anywhere, so I suppose it needs to be part of the explanation... I mean, there has to be some kind of paper trail, right?
The person in this role before me... she didn't record the interest, and she didn't bother explaining those deposits to the FBI either. It seems a bit sketchy to me, honestly, because at the end of the day, the bank activity has to reconcile with the actual receipts.
Thanks, casualorca5..
But I'm really struggling with the interest part—specifically, what we collect from customers.
So, I book the invoice normally in the IRA, but I put the interest under Inflows, without sales tax, using the type "extraordinary income"... the interest amount shows up in KPMG, but I don't include it in the sales tax forms. So, it doesn't go into the sales tax summary either..
What I'm wondering about is the end of the year—when looking at the annual Recapitulation of inflows and outflows, those interest payments show up in the Inflows section via the bank statements..
Should those interest amounts be specified somewhere else so the IRS knows they're actually interest?? Like, do I need to write an explanation stating that the discrepancy in the bank statement inflows refers to interest, or how does that work??..
Usually, we receive payments on behalf of clients, and we specify those separately for the FBI (listing which clients they are and when the disbursement happened) to show those aren't our income since we're just passing them back to the clients...
Now I've just got this whole dilemma regarding these collected interest amounts to solve..
Thanks!