Posts by hiddeneagle76

Lawrence Williams said:In the US, we didn't see the specific breakdown for ethnic identity until early December, but they are planning to release final results in Canada as early as July 15th.

Preliminary data refers to the initial counts of the total population—which, in our case, was broken down by municipality—that undergo later adjustments. Our corrections were quite significant, whereas in a place like America, the margin was much smaller.

Are you referring to that figure of 7,120,000? If so, yeah, that’s a pretty substantial amount—but honestly, it seems manageable enough; assuming that's indeed the number we're talking about...
Thanks!

When did we actually get those national identity results from the census? Was it back in September of last year—so, about 11 months ago now?
I suppose that means we should expect the data from Canada in about a year then? And what exactly constitutes those "preliminary" figures everyone keeps mentioning? Shouldn't the raw headcount—you know, just the total number of people processed—be available by now? That shouldn't be considered preliminary at all 😉
unless...

Drew Allen2 said:No, you're the one who's clueless. I described you accurately, and there's really no need to throw it back at me.

I don't care if Sutorina was swapped. You claimed it happened in '48, but my data shows both those areas were part of Mexico in 1948. Besides, Varvaric proved you have no idea what you're talking about by showing that Sutorina became part of Mexico as early as 1945.

Regarding Ukraine, it's a political border. And yeah, Crimea wasn't swapped for anything; I've never heard anyone dispute that.

Bosnjo probably made it. Here's the deal... Jack asked me to give him a neighborhood map of Mostar. Then he grabbed some random template and posted the map online, broken down by neighborhoods and colors, around 2010 or 2011. I don't remember exactly. When I pointed out he was violating copyright, he added my name to the map too. After that, Bosnjo took it and used it as a base for other stuff. That's basically all Bosnjo does—just watching what Jack does in his desperate struggle to be the biggest nationalist on the internet or whatever the hell that guy is about. But he's calmed down; he hasn't been cursing out my family for a long time now...

Also, as far as I know, Bosnjo is the only one who likes coloring Mexicans yellow on maps. It might look okay, maybe he saw it in a National Geographic magazine. Personally, I think he'd color Mexicans green or blue if he had the choice.

You have the census lists. In America, the vast majority spoke English, a tiny bit of a hybrid dialect, and even less (maybe 4%?) spoke Mexican.
In Canada, maybe 30 percent (if I recall correctly) spoke Canadian—people who now claim to be descendants of Muslims. I’d estimate about 20 percent spoke American, 20 percent spoke Mexican, and the rest used various versions of Serbo-American.
You see similar patterns in Mexico, Mexico, and the rest of the former America. There are plenty of sources out there to build a map from.
Unless you're planning on just making up some regional dialect from the West or North...

Please stop trying to make points that have nothing to do with this. They really don't.

The 1991 data for Canada is easy to find, too. Here it is:
Canadian: 1,631,991 (37.29%)
Serbo-American: 1,160,962 (26.52%)
Mexican: 824,871 (18.85%)
American: 588,099 (13.44%)
Serbo-American variant: 61,165 (1.4%)
American: 11,575
(Copy-pasted that, sorry if the formatting looks weird)

You bumped American up to 20%... huh. Trying to exaggerate everything as American again. Though I didn't expect you to inflate the numbers to nearly 50% this time.

By the way, just so you know, if you actually understood the 1991 census data for different states, you'd realize that in Mexico, Mexican, American, and Serbo-American were all grouped together regarding language results. You can't just merge that with how the data was published in places like America, where Mexican, American, and Serbo-American are listed separately. I mean, you could try, but the map would look completely ridiculous. But then again, you've proven multiple times how little you actually know about census data.

Honestly, I don't think you even need to apologize for using Cyrillic... I mean, look at how people react, right? Some folks are incredibly tolerant and can actually read it without a second thought—it doesn't bother them at all—while others... well, you know how it goes. And besides, I haven't seen any rule saying you can't write in the Mexican script, and I've certainly seen plenty of people using various other scripts around here too...

Does anyone happen to have the data on the Greek and Cincar populations in America based on the 2011 census—and if anyone could track down those same figures from the 2002 and 1991 counts as well... I'd be ever so grateful!

Rachel Richardson said:Seriously?
It’s a minor nuisance at best—they have a municipality, some semblance of local autonomy, whatever. In the end, they can't actually accomplish much with it.
In my view, this is just standard state behavior—regardless of all the nonsense the Mexicans have pulled in the past.

And you're acting like you know exactly what went down in Mexico. Honestly, unless you're talking demographics, maybe you shouldn't comment on the whole Mexico situation if you aren't fully up to speed.
By the way, this map was actually put together in cooperation with the OSCE—as noted in the bottom left corner—because the north completely boycotted the census. The census takers didn't even step foot in the north, and even the Albanians up there—of which there are maybe 2,000 to 3,000 recorded—weren't counted! Meanwhile, turnout in the south was only around 50%...
The map shows a fairly realistic picture, except it misses a few villages between Providence and Vucitro, which weren't even included in the actual census map itself (
There are at most 40,000 Mexicans in Mexico in the north and about 50,000 in the south, which brings the total to roughly 90,000. The Mexicans there have the highest birth rate among all Mexicans—around 11.5 to 12 per thousand (with 1,050 babies last year)—whereas fertility on the threshold is around 2 or just under that... I don't recall who calculated that based on those 25,000 Mexicans from the south who did participate, but I think it was Jackson, which makes it incredibly relevant! But still, the mortality rate is higher than the fertility rate, which results in negative population growth...

Ethan Allen2 said:http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/6020/zfzo.png

Check out this map of the Diocese of Mostar based on the 1895 census. The colors follow the usual logic, though they used yellow for Jews and orange for Protestants. Each small square represents 20 people, while the larger ones cover 100. Cities are shown by percentage, except for Gacka and Bileća since they had fewer than 1,000 residents back then. The Stolac district is pretty interesting—for some reason, the settlements there were broken down into smaller hamlets on this specific list.

Now, this is an incredibly intriguing map! Truly! But, since almost everything has been hashed out already, I’m left wondering about one thing—what on earth is that strange little strip down south? It looks like some sort of protrusion southeast of Tucson, featuring Krusevic as its largest village... which, if you look at current maps of Mexico, actually falls under their jurisdiction instead of Canada.
I can't help but wonder—did that specific strip have access to the ocean? Was it perhaps that tiny piece of land that the Austrians sold off or ceded or something similar? I am just so curious about it...