CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › redgardener58 › Posts

Posts by redgardener58

3 posts shown.

Alright, thanks to everyone else as well!

fadedbadger73: I dealt with Plutchik quite some time ago, if that happens to be the test in question, though I honestly can't recall the specifics of how it was structured.
Dear Rebecca Scott3 and gentlesailor25, my thanks to you both.
I am a psychologist currently working on translating a questionnaire from English into American

I would appreciate some input from my fellow psychologists, as well as any English specialists or linguists out there, regarding the translation of a response scale

The original version uses false, mostly false, neutral, mostly true, true

My translation was incorrect, generally incorrect, neutral, generally correct, correct

An English specialist performed a back-translation (translating my American version back into English)

They rendered it quite elegantly as "incorrect, generally incorrect..."

It just occurred to me that I chose "correct" simply because that is the standard convention we use here in the States

However, I find myself without a substantive argument as to why "correct, generally correct" should be superior to "true, generally true..."

I decided to plug both versions of the scale into Google to see which one yields more hits

The version using "correct" returned about six pages

While the "true" version yielded a single solitary link, and even then, it was just a paper by some English scholars🙂

Now I am left wondering: why shouldn't I just use "true"?

What are your thoughts on this entire situation?