CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Walter Carter58 › Posts

Posts by Walter Carter58

5 posts shown.

Oh my God in Philosophy ·
Kate James11 said:My reasoning is pretty straightforward: since there isn't any empirical evidence for the existence of God, while we do have a massive collection of various mythologies—like the Bible and other old tales—it seems quite certain that we're looking at the products of the human imagination.

If that's a settled fact, I guess there's really nothing left to discuss... 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
Oh my God in Philosophy ·
Sigmund said:Based on the fact that nothing suggests otherwise to me.

Nothing suggests it? You must be a total moron.

Sigmund said:P.S. How long do you think your handle will last this time? Psst, I won't tell anyone... 🙂

Just more proof that you're a complete idiot.
What handle are you talking about, you jerk?
Am I a creationist too?
Most of you atheists—with few exceptions—are such absolute trash that it's hard to even describe...
Is everyone a creationist just because they don't agree with your psychotic brains?
If being a creationist is just a synonym for anyone who can't stand atheist scum, then sure, we're all creationists. You're right there.
It would be easy for some "expert" on fools to get blamed for things he didn't do, but if garbage like Sigmund and Wand 1 say he did it, then some moderator trash comes along and bans him.
Since it's clear you're just a coordinated group of atheist filth working to silence anyone who thinks differently, I know I can count on one false accusation from someone using the name Sigmund to get some moderator trash to ban me too.
You're just criminal scum, enjoying yourselves by banning dissenters while wallowing in your own endless filth...
Atheist terror everywhere you look on this forum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Just posted this over on the philosophy board under the "God" thread.

Quote: Sigmund said:Based on the fact that nothing suggests otherwise to me.

Nothing suggests it? Sounds like you're a complete idiot to me.

Sigmund said:P.S. How long do you think your username will last this time? Don't worry, I won't tell anyone... 🙂

Another piece of proof that you're an absolute idiot.
What kind of nonsense are you talking about with usernames, you jerk?
Am I a creationist too?
Most of you atheists—with few exceptions—are such bottom-tier trash that it's hard to even describe.
Is everyone just labeled a creationist if they don't agree with your psychopathic logic?
If being a creationist is just a synonym for people who can't stand atheist filth, then sure, we're all creationists. You're right there.
It’s easy enough for some self-proclaimed expert on fools to be blamed for things he didn't do, especially when garbage like Sigmund and Wand 1 write something up and then some moderator trash comes along and bans the guy.
Since it's clear you're just a unified pack of atheist scum working to silence anyone who thinks differently, I know I can expect some moderator piece of work to ban me based on a false accusation from someone using the name Sigmund.
You really are just criminal trash, finding joy only by banning dissenters so you can wallow in your own filth.


Do us theists actually have a right to an opinion, or does anyone Sigmund accuses of being a clone get permanently banned without any actual evidence?...
Oh my God in Philosophy ·
Amanda Jackson5 said:Since God most likely doesn't exist, there’s really no point in wasting breath asking why He chooses to permit certain things or withhold others.

It’s a good thing you didn't say He definitely doesn't exist. What exactly are you basing this "most likely" theory on? Just because there is evil in the world...
Oh my God in Philosophy ·
I really wonder when people will finally realize that answering "God doesn't exist!" to the question of why He allows evil in the world isn't actually an answer...

Besides, there’s zero logic in asking "why does God allow suffering?" only to conclude that "He doesn't exist" as a rebuttal.

Does that even make sense? Is it logical?

It would be much easier for me to just erase God from the equation to avoid dealing with the heavy stuff, but they say there’s no such thing as an easy philosophical question, right?

If you want to call yourself a philosopher, you have to be ready for the hard questions.

And "why does God allow evil?" is certainly one of them.

Who actually thinks that saying "because God isn't real" is a logical response to that?