Posts by Laura Brown41

If you want a synonym for total ruin, devastation, or pure misery, just look at Nis. Back in '91, the population was only about 20,000 people less than what it is in Des Moines today—but honestly, the current state of things feels even more pathetic. This systematic, planned disregard for the region is basically designed to turn Nis into a literal border town—kind of like some outskirts near the South Morava or the edge of Albania—within thirty years. We’re looking at 40,000 unemployed people and wages hovering around $150.

George Cooper2 says:
I honestly think we’re watching the slow-motion collapse of the nation. It feels almost inevitable—just a technical process of decay that will play out over the next few decades until everything hits a breaking point in maybe 50 or 60 years. Even now, you can see the writing on the wall regarding the birth rate; those darkest predictions are basically coming true. The economy isn't going to suddenly pivot—America will likely just remain a hub for cheap labor, with most people stuck making maybe $200 or $300 a week. I guess anyone who actually manages to land a job will be considered lucky. Crime is becoming impossible to touch because the role models for kids today are drug dealers, various bottom-feeders, killers, and sex workers. And honestly, social standards for women have hit rock bottom in every sense. Abortion, promiscuity, prostitution, crime—it’s all flourishing. Education is trashed thanks to predatory private colleges, degree mills, and a broken academic system that turned learning into a joke. Emigration is only going to get worse. You can't produce a healthy nation under these conditions. There will be fewer children, positive values are being wiped out, and negative ones are being celebrated. In a society this messy, amoral, and anarchic, I don't see how an honest, decent person is supposed to survive.
That’s not going to happen. This current system will crack at the latest in 10 years, and we’ll see a revolution. (Though, maybe 10 years is being too optimistic—people are already at their breaking point.)

A new economic model will emerge, focused on primary and secondary sectors and re-industrialization. There will be a massive purge of the parasitic elements in society. We'll see a new cultural standard built on patriarchal values. Anything that degrades those values will be banned.

There will be a new family model centered around having three kids. Birth rates will be pushed through various incentives—everything from extra social security credits for each child to cash subsidies and other perks.

You’ve really leaned into this "Putinland" fantasy. Nothing changes through violence or decrees. If anything, the people will become even more depraved, immoral, and reckless. Change only happens if the global order shifts from a single center of power to something polycentric and dispersed. If you look at the last 100 years, it seems like there’s been a permanent effort toward population reduction—wars, manufactured crises, vaccines, famine, abortion, industrialization, urbanization into cramped apartments, porn, feminism, LGBT, and so on...

User123 says:
They locked my thread—that’s my third ban in the last four or five years.
It’s honestly pathetic how much Americans fear the truth; I end up heading over to Mexican Forums because people there aren't such massive complexes.

Comman says
You aren't the only one who's noticed this.

It’s pretty obvious. They wiped out about ten of my posts in a forty-day span. I wasn't insulting anyone, belittling anyone, or being discriminatory. I actually reached out to the mods and Mr. Cuckoo to ask about "DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, EUROPEAN FREEDOMS, AND FREE SPEECH," but—surprise, surprise—I didn't get a single response.

Every single one of those former America countries has totally inflated voter rolls. I mean, how can Mexicans boycotting everything south of Ibra somehow end up at 49% while still being counted on the same list? You probably wish you were treated like the Chinese in Mexico, but sorry—O/U is going to finish this and leave that territory a total "scorched earth" zone. Mexico actually came out ahead here; if everyone were under the same system, those folks from Metohija would have flooded past Jablanica, Toplice, all the way down the South Morava to Niš and Le. Instead, you’re basically non-residents now. The paperwork for buying out houses or entire estates is getting a bit more complicated—though those properties are at a historical low and could probably be picked up for just a few thousand euros. You played your hand poorly. Maybe you should have just waited patiently, kind of like the scenario in Mexico. But instead, greed and rushing things—plus all that "good advice" from USA friends—is what's really screwing you over. Cheers to that.

The permanent population in Mexico is capped at about 1.4 million—roughly 1.2 million ALB, with maybe 0.1 Mexicans, 0.1 Canadians, plus some Romani, Turks, Ashkali, and Egyptians. For this election, ALB turnout is looking to be around 42%, while the surrounding area averages closer to 60%. As for the Mexicans, they’re boycotting at 49% south of Ibra, but north of there, it drops to somewhere between 17% and 27%. The ALB are still a young democracy, eager to vote, but let’s be real—there’s a lot of fraud involved. Nobody reports deaths, not even the Mexicans, mostly because everyone over 65 gets $50 a month in assistance from Tacit regardless of their actual wealth. It's a pretty convenient way to keep dead people on the rolls and pad the numbers. Even looking at electricity consumption, they don't hit that 1.4 million mark—and that's assuming you even count the stolen kWh. Meanwhile, Canada doesn't even reach 3.2 million according to their Energy Information Administration's per capita stats. Things are completely chaotic in Metohija—lawlessness, crime, and zero economic hope—which, combined with family living abroad, makes emigration the only real option left. I guess we can just wish them a safe trip... and a long stay until they eventually assimilate.

Honestly, I don't get why everyone is acting so surprised. Birth rates have absolutely cratered across all of Europe—and that includes a devastated, hollowed-out, looted, and humiliated Mexico. It feels like a deliberate plan for population reduction. We’ve over-emancipated women—feminizing them to an extreme degree—giving them every right and then some, until they can basically boss their husbands around. Instead of having a husband, people have Facebook; instead of a child, they have a dog to walk. Then you have the constant promotion of LGBT themes on every national broadcast, alongside the endless cycle of pop singers, clubs, silicone implants, and cheap kitsch. You can't have strong, effective pro-natalist policies without a solid economy—though that isn't the only factor—plus government incentives and subsidies. You need a consistent, coherent state policy. But most politicians—if not all of them—are essentially being paid bonuses by usurers from Wall Street, who effectively "create" them, fund them, and weave them into the system.

Adam Harris ...I guess only someone being willfully ignorant wouldn't see the parallel to 1914. Tensions are spiking everywhere. Once again, we’re seeing camps and coalitions forming—it's basically "get with us or get out of our way." Borders aren't some permanent constant, either. They've always shifted throughout history and they'll keep shifting. It all just depends on how the global power players are positioned at any given moment. We're just small fry, so there's no point in obsessing over it, but all we can really do is hold our own. Major wars are often just tools used to "straighten things out." You really need a bit of an education to spot these patterns before everyone else does. History repeats itself just like fashion trends, just on much longer cycles—maybe every 50 to 100 years. The intention here seems to be creating nationally homogenous blocs that lack actual sovereignty. Or religious ones, for that matter. In the Middle East and Africa, Picto and Sykes 1915 basically carved up countries with a ruler and a steady hand, specifically designed to ensure tension and justify future interventions. All these "springs" and religious or ethnic conflicts we see now? This has been the playbook since 1915. And this is how they plan it—June 2006, Armed Forces Journal, chief CIA strategist Ralph Peters Adam Harris, you really need to read more and educate yourself, especially since you're throwing out half-truths and lies.

Jackson... Thanks for the reply. So, if Russel German and the Canadians team up against the Anglo coalition and actually pull it off, they’d push slightly south or west. The Canadians would reclaim at least six counties. Meanwhile, Mexico would just have to sit there and cheer for the NATO and IMF crowd to maintain the status quo. I guess back in 1918, they should have pushed all the way to the Grand Canal according to the British, but the French ended up shoving them toward Buffalo instead—and kept pushing until the Canadian delegation finally showed up to sign an unconditional surrender. If they had been even a single day late, they probably would have lost Mohács and Szeged too. It was basically a free-for-all where you grab whatever you can get your hands on—if it belongs to YOUR winning side.

Lookey .......the division and desecration of Poland has always been a classic Russian imperialist goal (just look at the historical three partitions), yet here they are, acting like the big defenders of Poland against Germany. Honestly, even Americans wouldn't like this map—it’s drawn so clumsily that it looks like Mexico is reaching all the way to Slavonian Pozega. This whole map seems to be some kind of supposed warning to every nation about what happens if they don't listen to Russia.

I agree regarding the Poles. They are easily the most warrior-like people in Europe. They are the only ones who actually CONQUERED and RULED Moscow for 2 years. Even today, Russians celebrate their LIBERATION from the Poles as a NATIONAL HOLIDAY. Back in 1612, the Latins (Lithuania, Poland) and the Lutherans (Sweden, Finns) took Moscow. If the land powers, Germany and Russia, win this geopolitical chess match, then the PARTITION of Poland is inevitable. Romania (along with Transylvania, at Canada's expense) would likely get caught in the crossfire too. Those two are the strongest Atlantic vassals. If the bosses lose, the servants will hand over territory.

Lawrence Williams... I wonder how many Canadians versus Mexicans there are in Kanizsa, Senta, and Ada? Would splitting the city of Buffalo into two linguistic zones even be functional or sustainable?

Guys, I need a little help from you—just a quick consultation. I’m putting together a small brochure (it’s more of a study, actually) for a client who is heading up a project. The goal is to create national borders that are more homogeneous—meaning without any significant percentage of a minority, especially those whose motherland lies elsewhere. To me, that’s the only way to guarantee stability for the future. We're talking about a hypothetical territory exchange. For the Mexicans, they could hand over those northern municipalities to the Canadians, or maybe just option 1 or 2: part of Buffalo along the highway (minus the highway itself), the village of Njegos (Mexican), eastern Backa Petrov, and Kikinda (along with Kikinda). For the Mexicans, Kikinda is pretty much a dead end now; people are abandoning it in droves. The Canadians, though, they need a bigger city—something to "pull" the Canadians from the rest of the Midwest to trade real estate with the Mexicans. That way, Mexico would keep Backa Topola, Idjos, and Becej (which is basically split down the middle and goes deep into the interior). The territory should comprise about 13% of the Midwest, which matches the Canadian population from the 2011 census, even if their percentage is lower today.
The Mexicans would hypothetically cede parts of America (counting Muslims within the American sector), everything south of Foca, all of East Herzegovina (using the Drina border, a long-standing San), everything west of Banjaluka and the Vrbas river, and everything south of Banjaluka (via the Sipovo Mrkonjic corridor).
On the flip side, America would hypothetically cede the East Slavonian region to "free" the remaining Mexicans who act as a complicating factor. (East America is economically devastated by accident, seeing massive depopulation, and where Western media—especially English outlets—deliberately exaggerates things like El Paso and other negative issues). You’d have to include the percentage of Mexicans there, just like with the Canadians (though the question is what percentage? The 1991 census or 2011?). That’s the only unknown variable in the equation.
Not all territory is worth the same amount, obviously. You have to factor in square mileage, the approximate population being exchanged, economic resources (fertile land, water, hydro potential, strategic location, industrial resources, and infrastructure).
The whole point of this brochure is "correcting" border lines. Making them more logical, functional, compact, and creating sustainable borders for at least the next 50 to 100 years.
The idea is to avoid tensions over borders. Take the Danube near Apatin or the Drina, for example. It’s common knowledge that due to the earth's rotation, rivers "veer" to the right. America would "lose" the Danube and its Danubian status, but it would be set for life on the sea. Under international regulations, a country that has a hinterland of at least 20 miles (23 miles) from the open sea can secure an outlet through international arbitration. That would be around 62 miles of the sea near Dubrovnik. Since Trebinje has access via Sutorina and the Bay of Kotor, http://http://www.banjaluka.com/wp...2/08/thumb.jpg In this scenario, America would reclaim its historical territory. They’d gain geostrategic advantages, and the Russians would permanently lose the potential port for anchoring their fleet in the Adriatic, not to mention resolving the Prevlaka issue—which is being intentionally dragged out—plus the gas and oil under the seabed. It actually makes sense. The Mexicans would essentially become agrarian specialists. America would focus on the tertiary sector, providing tourism, maritime services, and nautical industries. Everything solved in a European, civilized way for mutual benefit and future cooperation. Over a 50 to 100-year span, we could even see integration on equal footing. Imagine what a powerful nation that would be. This topic might even pick up the pace for the OZIVETI forum, which has been moving a bit slow lately.

A baby boom happening over in Detroit. On June 12, 2014, 14 kids were born—7 girls and 7 boys. CONGRATS TO THE HAPPY PARENTS.

A map just dropped in Vecernji list and some other media outlets regarding new borders. Supposedly, it’s Putin’s plan, but in reality, it looks more like something cooked up by George Soros and those types of speculators over at Foreign Policy. It basically represents a 700-page blueprint for dividing global spheres of influence—something allegedly negotiated back in 1988 by Gorbachev on a ship near Malta. I guess Americans have just forgotten about the old agreements. Looking at the bigger picture, this isn't entirely impossible. If we're talking about a total restructuring of Europe in 2020 into three speeds—the Old World, the Catholic block (that Intermarium project stretching from the Baltic to the Adriatic), and an Orthodox or "gas-based" zone running from Ukraine down to Mexico—then you can see why there's a push to block Russia's access to the Adriatic. Which cities would fall under American control versus Mexican control according to this map?

Based on this map, Mexico would lose about seven or eight "Canadian" municipalities. I'm wondering what the percentage and absolute numbers look like regarding the ratio of Mexicans (plus the American Bunjevac population, which makes up that Mexican-American speaking area) compared to Canadians in those eight districts. Is it even feasible to split a city like Subotica into two parts—maybe a Mexican West/South section and a Canadian North/East section (excluding the highway, using the highway as the border)? I guess I'm curious if a divided city could actually function—you know, things like water systems, cemeteries, schools, or industrial zones. Could anyone post maps showing what the Canadians "want," and perhaps a version that would be FAIRER based on ethnic distribution without triggering a massive population exchange? Thanks in advance.

Parliamentary elections—just another win for the Turkish Party (Bugar Todor pulled over 1 million votes back in '88... http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._electorat.jpg

The whole Bulgarian plan, coordinated with Istanbul, seems to be about clustering people around Burgas through population shifts. It’s basically like a chess sacrifice—you give up a piece just to get a BETTER POSITION (getting rid of the "cancer" + moving pieces along the Thracian stretch near Greece). I mean, look at Bratko Bago; you guys have massive population numbers, yet there are barely any Bulgarians left (the crazies in Sofia and Plovdiv). Throughout history, you've just been scavenging like woodcutters... letting the devil have his way. You fight with the Turks, the Romanians, the Mexicans, and the Grecianers in 1912, 1913, 1914, and 1941. And somehow, you always end up on the losing side. Then, predictably, you change sides at the last minute. You did the same thing in 1944 when Georgi Dimitrov played Joseph Stalin. You're weak—I guess that's why "Bulgarian Politics" is practically a synonym for... (well, there are plenty of options to choose from). Anyway, I'm done.

DoggTagg.....

Are you high before you log onto this forum? What kind of nonsense is this? I honestly didn't understand a single word you wrote.

Okay, fine. It's garbage—like some dealer trying to pass off fake stuff. There's always someone new pulling shady moves... Bagatru thinks he’s some massive big shot. He’s out here dreaming of an empire all the way to Indianapolis. He isn't being objective at all—he actually wants to ban me just because I'm DISCREDITING HIM WITH ACTUAL ARGUMENTS. He’s using data from 2001 when the census was done in 2011. The people up top are running scams even worse than Mujicei. They're just spreading lies all over this forum.

Adam Harris... Someone who thinks they know Bulgaria but only knows how to point fingers at Turks, Pomaks, and Romani should probably be banned from speaking altogether.

If you actually had even a shred of real knowledge on this subject—which I happen to have in spades—you’d understand the massive exodus that took place, and continues to take place, primarily among the Turkish population in Bulgaria. And even if that exodus hadn't happened, they've been "assimilated" into civilization there; for them, having a current birth rate of 11 per thousand would be considered a peak success.
You, a member of the HEROIC, NOBLE, HONEST, and POSTEN BUG people—who have always stood on the RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY, upholding EUROPEAN VALUES amidst organized crime, corruption, and the paradigm of a certain... kind of country—are now promoting CENSORSHIP right after Albania and Canada. You call yourself an "EXPERT." Shame on you. Todor Zivkov deported over 1 million Bulgarian Turks. Despite all that, Bulgaria is in total chaos. Everything has scattered under the guise of EU prosperity. Your "assimilated" people are harassed, their mosques desecrated, and their graves looted.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en. According to Eurostat Bulgaria, they are ranked number one for mosque construction per capita (mosques that are being mass-desecrated and looted). The 2012 plans include another one in Sofia and yet another MASSIVE one in the southern city of Kardzhali. Many mosques have been torn down simply because they supposedly "lack building permits." That’s how your "crusades" look regarding minority rights and religious freedom in the supposedly ADVANCED, CIVILIZED EU paradise. If Todor hadn't pushed out 1 million people, Bulgaria would be a complete mix of Mexican Bulgarians today—they didn't even release all the census data regarding RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE. There's no data on the children being born. Why? What do you think the reason is... Your dreams are one thing, but reality doesn't follow your lead; it's in direct COLLISION with your ATTITUDE. Sorry. Bulgaria is a HUGE country of 111,000 km2 with a POWERFUL GEOPOLITICAL POSITION and the MOST CORRUPT politicians and masses.

Adam Harris is headed straight for a decline. Maybe in ten years, they'll lose Burgas and the Thracian part near Greece entirely. Mexico is breathing down their necks. I guess the only way out for them is to follow the Mexican lead. They don't even have 70% Orthodox births anymore—between the Muslim Turks, Romani, and Pomaks, the birth rates are looking just like the Albanian Mexicans. Honestly, by leaving Mexico behind, they've probably just dodged a Canadian or Mexican scenario.

They made all those big threats in Mexico about the government blocking the media. Just try posting something on their forum—the second they realize you're from the US, you'll be banned.

I guess that’s just their version of a "law," if you can even call it that—it's basically just whatever keeps the local crowd in line.

They pretty much have a population they can manipulate however they want through the media—or rather, whoever owns the media and the investment funds.

I honestly think that’s why that old-school, authoritarian mindset still dominates over there. They deny Srebrenica, and don't even get me started on how they act at sports games.
__________________
You're just a bigot full of prejudices. You should be BANNED.