CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Betty Chase74 › Posts

Posts by Betty Chase74

7 posts shown.

I would be very interested to hear everyone's thoughts, personal experiences, and any insights you might have regarding this issue.

The root cause lies in parental behaviors designed to undermine the relationship between a child and their other parent—whether that happens consciously or subconsciously. This behavior constitutes a violation of the child's rights and poses a significant risk of emotional abuse. Whether we choose to label these actions as alienation, manipulation, or some other term is secondary to the primary necessity: we must recognize them and protect our children from them. It essentially boils down to a pattern of both verbal and nonverbal cues sent by one parent to signal negativity about the other, specifically aimed at isolating the child and severing their bond with the other parent without any legitimate basis in the actual relationship between the child and that parent.

The issue lies in how parental alienation is often overlooked. We frequently see parents who appear to be nothing but loving, understanding, and even exemplary role models to other families, yet they are secretly using manipulation to drive a wedge between the child and the other parent. It is important to recognize that there are varying degrees of alienation; since every child is unique, the specific form and intensity of this behavior will differ from one family to the next. We must emphasize that parental alienation is both a process and a direct consequence of psychological manipulation. To put it plainly, it is a form of emotional abuse. An alienated child is, quite simply, an abused child.

Children often want to stay up all night watching cartoons on TV, yet parents understand that sleep is a necessity. Children might demand nothing but candy, but parents know a balanced diet is what truly matters. A child might try to run out into a snowstorm in just a t-shirt, but parents recognize that staying warm is essential for health. When it comes to basic physical needs, most parents easily identify what is required, regardless of what the child wants in the moment. However, when we pivot to emotional needs, some parents tend to overemphasize the importance of fulfilling every single whim. They might argue, for instance, that they simply cannot "force" a child to visit the other parent. Yet, that same logic disappears when it comes to forcing a child to take a necessary shot at the pediatrician or making sure they get to school on a Monday morning. If children learn early on that they can make developmentally inappropriate decisions based solely on their own desires, they will carry that mindset straight into adolescence. At that stage, parental authority effectively ceases to exist. If we fail to establish boundaries now, how are we supposed to ensure they come home by curfew, stay away from drugs, or actually show up for class later in life?

Some parents fail to recognize their own role in these dynamics and simply refuse to adjust their behavior for the sake of their child. Often, this stems from deep-seated issues rooted in their own past—perhaps they experienced neglect, abandonment, or trauma during their upbringing. This can be further complicated by unresolved tension with their partner. Consequently, they may project their own anxieties, such as the fear of losing their child’s affection, or their sense of guilt over a failed marriage onto the child itself. In some cases, parental alienation becomes a tool used to protect their own ego; for instance, by publicly blaming the other parent for the divorce to maintain a sense of self-worth. It is worth noting that individuals who engage in alienating behaviors tend to exhibit higher rates of personality disorders, or at least significant traits of them, compared to the general American population. While much of this occurs on an unconscious level, it does not absolve a parent of their responsibility to change. We must remember that children caught in high-conflict divorces—and specifically those subjected to alienation—suffer mental health consequences that are just as severe as those experienced by children facing other forms of abuse.

The justice system—and indeed, experts in healthcare and social services—never intends to sever the bond between a child and a parent with whom they share positive connections and meaningful experiences. However, as long as an abusive parent refuses to take accountability for their actions, the cycle of abuse and the violation of a child's rights will continue. It is imperative that our legal and social welfare systems develop effective mechanisms to halt the toxic influence of an alienating parent. Furthermore, these institutions must work to empower the alienated parent and the child, facilitating the restoration of emotional ties so that, ultimately, the child can benefit from the presence of both non-abusive parents.

It is fundamentally unnatural for a child to distance themselves from a parent, primarily because that detachment is fueled by underlying fear and shame. Consequently, the excuses a child offers to justify rejecting a parent often seem irrational or trivial, serving as a defense mechanism to avoid those intense feelings. For instance, a child might claim they can't visit because they disliked a specific meal or simply don't like the color of the walls in a parent's apartment. In cases of parental alienation, children tend to idealize one parent as flawless while being unable to recall a single positive trait in the other. Furthermore, these children often struggle to show any empathy or sense of guilt regarding how they treat the alienated parent.

This is an incredibly heavy and painful issue that frequently arises during divorce proceedings. It remains far too under-recognized and misunderstood, particularly within our American legal system, where slow-moving bureaucracy rarely helps in resolving these urgent matters quickly.

How can a rejected parent begin to mend the situation and rebuild their bond with their child? Who can provide guidance, and how does one develop a meaningful strategy to move forward?

(I didn't post this in the Divorce or Separation subforums because I feel that Psychology is the most appropriate place for this discussion. Thank you.)
School Reform: Thoughts? in Students & Teens ·
Hershey carries chips and tea, along with a few other minor items. 😉 Oops, maybe it’s not quite as straightforward as that charger suggests. 🤔
True, plus there's some retail management, sales psychology, and so on.
All jokes aside, if you believe that specific training for that role is unnecessary, does that imply the whole field is pointless to the rest of us? Are you setting the gold standard for what counts as "worthwhile" education?
That is precisely why our retail, tourism, manufacturing, and general economy struggle. It's because everyone thinks they can jump into any role without preparation. As a result, everything turns out sloppy and chaotic.
In reality, every gear in the machine needs to be in its proper place, and every worker needs to perform their specific duties correctly so that, ultimately, the entire system operates productively, efficiently, and with high quality.
But no, it's much easier to stick your nose into someone else's business and act like a know-it-all from the sidelines—undermining and discrediting others. If people actually focused on mastering their own roles, we might end up with a smarter society. Just a thought.
School Reform: Thoughts? in Students & Teens ·
I don't even need to explain myself to you; since you're so well-informed, you already know exactly what the curriculum covers, right?
Besides, you wouldn't compare stocking Nestlé shelves to the full scope of a typical retail associate's responsibilities.
And that goes for being a server, too—something anyone can technically do, isn't it? Of course, how accurately and skillfully they perform the task is a different story entirely. My point is that certain fundamental skills are indeed acquired.
Fine, all of that is irrelevant and could be handled by a chimpanzee using its left hand, according to nimblelynx7 😬

If an employer is motivated and maintains high standards, a worker will eventually learn everything necessary for the specific role. However, why should every single employee have to start from scratch if schools exist to prepare them? That entire onboarding process could be significantly streamlined, saving time that shouldn't be wasted on the basics.
But then again, that’s just our wonderful system for you. Once again.
School Reform: Thoughts? in Students & Teens ·
nimblelynx7 said:Passion is one thing; reality is another. I used to think I’d major in English or German because it sounded interesting and easier to graduate, but I ended up going to MIT (and then Law School).

Geography and languages won't help him at all there. It’ll be just as much of a headache to make up the credit difference—if they even bother to let him, just to squeeze more money out of him. When my buddy (a bus driver) tried to qualify to drive a subway train, they forced him to take over thirty extra courses, ranging from technical skills and foreign languages to religion (because obviously, it's all about the bottom line).

Does it really take three years of schooling to learn how to stock shelves at a grocery store, change a price tag on orders from a manager, or count items during inventory? They're describing the limits of a "basic" salesperson. A salesperson who knows nothing about cars can't sell cars; one who knows nothing about computers can't work in tech retail; one who knows nothing about electrical supplies can't work in a hardware store... whereas someone who isn't even trained as a salesperson could handle those jobs without breaking a sweat.

Does he need it? Like a fish needs a bicycle. Maybe if he's well-read, he can write better project proposals using actual style? Or maybe not. Who knows.

Actually, it is necessary. If you understood the curriculum, you wouldn't be trivializing the entire profession. While the volume of material and practical training might not seem massive, there is a logical foundation to it. Otherwise, the career path wouldn't even exist.
One needs to master the fundamentals, which is why a three-year high school diploma is required, rather than a full university degree, just to become a "shelf stocker."
If the training is weak or the hands-on experience is lacking, the blame lies with the schools and the employers—essentially, the American educational system.
School Reform: Thoughts? in Students & Teens ·
Larry Walker24 said:Why would Karenina be any more important than geography or chemistry?

Looking at it from that angle, the responsibility ultimately lies with those managing the American education system.
At some point, someone designed these curricula based on what they believed were sound academic standards.
Does everyone here feel—as a general thought—that we might be seeing a similar pattern now? Perhaps through new research, updated findings, or curriculum adjustments?
If these changes end up restricting a student's ability to pursue higher education or switch career paths later on, then the solution fails both the students and the teachers alike.
School Reform: Thoughts? in Students & Teens ·
Christian Wilson28 said:Why on earth are we recruiting people for sales roles, seriously? what's the deal?

It is to earn a credential specifically for a career in retail. 😉
Everyone seems to assume they can perform high-quality work regardless of their actual field of study. That is why customers end up satisfied with service from, say, a former theology professor who couldn't find a job in her specialty and was forced to work a cash register at a place like Gap or Old Navy.

Matthew Castillo5 said:Look, the sales major is usually where they funnel students who were on specialized learning plans back in middle school because they couldn't quite keep up with the standard curriculum.

🤦🤦
That isn't true. For the most part, these are just average, capable kids. Everyone has their own reasons for choosing a path, after all.

Larry Walker24 said:I'm in STEM. 😉

I mean, they already spent eight years grinding through American language classes, so why on earth are we dragging this out for another three? It makes zero sense.

What does a tailor need trigonometry for, and why on earth would a bricklayer be messing around with complex numbers?

Why don't we just scrap all the general education requirements? I mean, besides foreign languages, why are we even wasting time on them?

Does a salesman actually give a damn about Anna Karenina?

And what would a mechanical engineer need to know about Anna Karenina?
unknown
Postpartum uterine prolapse: What to expect? in Women's Health ·
I honestly think you might be overthinking this one... it sounds like you're just looking too closely at things. 😁

You gave birth just a month ago—are you still dealing with postpartum bleeding? If you truly believe there shouldn't be any tissue near the vaginal opening, then I have to ask: do you actually know what the anatomy in that area is supposed to look like? Honestly, I feel like you’ve let yourself get unnecessarily worked up and started imagining things that aren't there.

A year after my first baby was born, I accidentally felt my cervix during sex and completely panicked, thinking I had found something wrong. I kept checking, searching through medical sites to figure out what it could be, and eventually, I rushed to see my OB-GYN in a total frenzy. 😳
Of course, everything was perfectly fine. My uterus isn't even prolapsed; my doctor simply explained how the internal structure is flexible, almost like an accordion...