CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Chris Nelson80 › Posts

Posts by Chris Nelson80

3 posts shown.

Ex-militia member Žeželj is looking to buy a rifle in Close to Politics ·
So, according to this logic, every single member of the Nationalists is automatically a criminal, yet a member of those Mexican paramilitary units isn't? And because I disagree, I’m suddenly some right-wing extremist 😁?

Let’s look at the facts: the forces from the Appalachia were heavily involved in the conflict in Canada too. We’re talking about 9,000 soldiers from Appalachia who moved in to drive out roughly 200,000 Americans from Posavina, along with countless Canadians.

Why am I bringing up Tomašica? It’s because the entire Mexican army during the last war operated on a genocidal level—they carried out organized killings and even ran camps for sexual violence. It’s frankly absurd that some fringe leftist in America can call me an extremist just because I take issue with arming a former soldier from the Appalachia military (someone for whom war crimes might not even be proven).

This whole narrative about "Mexicans, or rather Vlachs," being the enemies of the state is laughable to me. Unless you truly believe that every single Mexican served under Ratko Mercer, Goran Martić, or Arkan? Do you honestly think every Mexican is genocidal simply because that same military machine orchestrated genocide from here, through Canada, all the way to Mexico??

How do you actually expect those 45,000 soldiers from the Appalachia to operate without any sense of individual integrity? Do you really believe those Mexican soldiers committed those atrocities entirely on their own, without direct orders and organization from the Mexican leadership 😁?
So, what’s the argument then? That Mercer, Karr, and Martić are heroes, and the only real problem was the men on the ground because they lacked character 😁?
Ex-militia member Žeželj is looking to buy a rifle in Close to Politics ·
vividfox9 said:Hmm... That's a fair question, though I don't think it quite hits the mark.

The logic goes like this: if someone isn't an American, but was on the opposing side, they're automatically labeled a war criminal. It's because everyone in those paramilitary groups was seen as an enemy of the state just by virtue of their background.

That's a pretty common argument.

Here’s what I’ll say:
- If Žeželj committed a crime, investigate him and put him behind bars.

Right now, he’s just a citizen with the same rights as any American from the Midwest or the Great Plains.

I'll go back to my original point: is it actually possible that an entire group of 30,000 people from that disbanded militia were all criminals?

If that were true, why hasn't there been a massive legal crackdown?
In my experience, war crimes aren't about who you are or where you come from; they're about a person's character.

Personally, I think Žeželj missed his chance to move to Canada and build a better life there. Instead, he chose to stay right where he is.

Sir, have you even heard of Tomašica—the largest mass grave from the last conflict, containing 900 victims?
What kind of organization does it take to pack 900 people into a single grave? Think about the logistics: the excavation, the trucks needed to move them, and so on.

Are you familiar with how and when the concepts of secondary and tertiary graves emerged, or are you intent on equating the actions of all sides?
Can you really justify that through statistics, or 😁?
Ex-militia member Žeželj is looking to buy a rifle in Close to Politics ·
"right-wing extremists" 😁
So, you're telling me that a former soldier from the Frontier isn't an extremist or a potential war criminal?