CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › analogbear14 › Posts

Posts by analogbear14

3 posts shown.

I suppose I might be one of those rare individuals for whom Saw 1 is actually the "least good" installment in the series.

In my estimation, the absolute peaks of the franchise are Saw 3, Saw 5 and Saw 6.

I am eagerly anticipating the next entry. Lately, I have been revisiting the entire saga from the beginning just to refresh my memory on the details... and I find myself somewhat preoccupied with certain elements regarding the third film:

SPOILER

1) So, logically speaking, Amanda should have released Jeff's wife from that collar AFTER Jeff completed his final test (confronting the Black man who killed his son) but BEFORE he entered the room where the three of them were held. And let us assume she actually released her—meaning she didn't just shoot her with a gun—because if Jeff had walked in and found his wife alive (and relatively intact), he probably wouldn't have felt the need to kill Jigsaw, would he?
Would Jigsaw then simply volunteer the location of their daughter by default?

2) However, regardless of how things played out, Jeff ends up killing Jigsaw, and once the tape plays, he claims that Jigsaw is "responsible for the death of his son." 🙂
HOW? In what specific sense could Jigsaw possibly be held responsible for his son's passing? 🙂

3) I am attempting to grasp some sort of "higher purpose" or cohesive logic within the narrative to make everything click, but I am struggling here... furthermore, it escapes me why Jeff's wife didn't explicitly warn him not to kill Jigsaw. 🕺
And how is it even possible that Jeff doesn't spend the entire time wondering where his daughter is? (I can wrap my head around his wife's confusion—until they met, she had no idea Jeff was involved in the game and didn't know the girl's whereabouts), but even when Jigsaw tells him that his "daughter needs him now more than ever"... surely, according to any semblance of psychological reasoning, he should have asked?
Chicago Blackhawks fans in Fans ·
EDIT - nothing to see here, really
Quick question about GPUs in Hardware ·
Greetings, I have a brief but rather pressing inquiry:

On my current laptop, prior to replacing the hard drive, I had Windows installed in such a way that whenever I launched a demanding application—let’s say AutoCAD, for instance—the system would automatically recognize my dedicated graphics card, specifically an Nvidia GeForce 610, and utilize its power to run the software.
However, following a fresh installation of Windows, I find that none of my installed programs seem to acknowledge the existence of that dedicated GPU; instead, everything defaults to the integrated graphics, which, quite frankly, is significantly underpowered for my needs.

I did eventually stumble upon a method to force certain programs to run via the dedicated card, but it seems that Windows periodically "forgets" the hardware exists, forcing me to manually reconfigure those settings time and time again.
Furthermore, I find it incredibly tedious and somewhat absurd to have to manually adjust the settings for every single individual program just to ensure they use the better hardware, so my question is this: how can I configure the system so that all applications and games permanently run through the dedicated graphics card, much like how it functioned before I performed the clean install of Windows? I am at a loss as to why this functionality has been disrupted...

Thank you 👍