Posts by Charles Gonzalez19

goldenjackal6 said:What kind of prejudices am I even talking about?

Look, you’ve already decided that because someone is a racist misogynist who calls scientists and atheists "Satanists"—and labels frauds as "doctors"—they can't possibly have a legitimate, well-reasoned argument regarding vaccines. That right there? That’s a prejudice.

Daniel Chase13 said:Exactly.

God—Jesus Christ Himself—is the very essence of Love and Truth.

That’s why He reveals the nature of sin to us out of pure love; He shows us the subtle traps set by Satan, those clever ways he tries to bind people spiritually and turn them into slaves to their own mistakes.

The Bible actually says the exact opposite. It literally says Jesus brings division and tears families apart:

Luke 12
"Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. From now on there will be five in one house divided against each other, three against two and two against three—father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law."

It's the same deal with people like Elvis Presley and you—all you guys want to do is spread division and hate by spreading lies. You've honestly found such a sad and incredibly hollow purpose for yourselves in this life.

coppersailor28 said:Went back to check. Put my glasses on—and sure enough, it actually says something else now (Stephen).

Damn, it’s not even funny this way... What a waste (not that I approve of this version either—it's hardly "innocent").

It wasn't even supposed to be funny, honestly. My whole point was just to call out the hypocrisy of the guy who made that video, and by extension, the hypocrisy of everyone on this forum pushing it around. And if we’re being totally real about it, it points directly back to the hypocrisy of the person this entire sub is dedicated to.

coppersailor28 said:🤣 Oh, please... alright, fine 👍.

I’m usually not one for these kinds of "jokes" (belittling people like this), but if you want funny, it's there...
How did you even come up with "Priest Crazy Mind" 🙏?

But like I said, I don't approve.

Huh? I didn't write that. And just to be clear, I'm not a fan of those kinds of pranks either.

EDIT:
Your name, where you're from, skin color, sexual orientation... basically anything you were born with is totally off limits.

Anything that's actually a personal choice someone makes? That's a whole different story.
An adult being shamelessly dishonest about how the real world works is fair game.

Daniel Chase13 said:So, looks like Kennedy is planning to go live soon...

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=3&theater

He’s actually planning a live session with this guy?


I’m honestly terrified to think what they're going to broadcast... maybe a toast to nothingness? You gonna join in on that one too?

Daniel Chase13 said:Well, I finally managed to wrap my head around the announcement for the upcoming public lecture by Elvis Presley

From the video description:

The Masons (specifically those French ‘Enlightenment’ types) labeled certain flourishing eras of Church history as dark ages—a classic diabolical inversion.

So, Dusparin’s church patron, Stjepan razum doba križarski rat i spaljivanje vještica, actually calls these periods the "flourishing eras" of Church history?!?

Daniel Chase13 said:1. I don't label people as liars just because they sincerely believe in certain hypotheses—regardless of whether those ideas are actually true or if I personally agree with them.

For instance, things like atheism, abiogenesis, the Big Bang, or macroevolution—to me, these ideas just don't hold water. But the people who believe in them and present arguments for why they do? I don't by any means consider them liars. I'm not a Flat Earther myself, but it doesn't bother me at all if someone else believes in that and chooses to publicly promote their viewpoint.

If someone were treating you the way they treat Elvis Presley, I’d stand up for you regardless of what you believed. That's just how I was raised.
An atheist isn't my enemy, nor is a Flat Earther.

2. People can think whatever they want about me—whether it's Elvis Presley or anyone else.

Daniel Chase13 said:In my view, atheism is the greatest illusion and falsehood since the dawn of time. ☕

<sigh>

Daniel Chase13 said:🤦

Not quite.

I've already had to address this kind of surface-level assumption before—I'm not Elvis Presley, nor am I some flat-earther.

So, why on earth are you so aggressively hyping up and promoting this guy:
1) who you straight-up call a liar
2) who thinks you're basically a satanist (along with anyone else who actually knows Earth is a globe)

Daniel Chase13 said:🤦

Not quite.

I've already had to address this kind of surface-level assumption before—I'm not Elvis Presley, nor am I some flat-earther.

So you aren't a flat-earther? That means you think Elvis Presley is lying then.

Bryan King3 said:Even if those news stories were actually factual, we’re still just talking about the fringe opinions of a few weirdos.
(I mean, there are these studies out there by certain "visionaries"—people who don't really have much to do with religion or atheism, per se—who claim the solution to global hunger could somehow involve consuming human flesh.

But things work quite differently within Christianity.
Hundreds of millions of believers partake in "Christ's Body."
Whether you view that as literal or symbolic is the big debate.
If we're being honest, calling it symbolic is mostly a matter of practicality—because, let's face it, there isn't enough physical meat to go around for everyone!
But man, if there were...

According to Catholic dogma, it's definitely not just a symbol. Transubstantiation (what an absolute mouthful) means the transformation of wafers and wine into actual human flesh and blood is a literal reality for Catholics. Every single Catholic Mass is basically a mass cannibalistic dinner; I mean, it would be if this whole trans-something-or-other transformation was actually happening. But hey, Daniel Chase13 seems totally fine with the idea of Catholic cannibalism.

Daniel Chase13 said:It isn't my fault that certain modern-day atheists shamelessly push this twisted ideology regarding the consumption of human flesh—including children and the deceased.

Look, it's not your fault. You aren't responsible for your constant stream of "unsubstantiated, brainless, biased, and straight-up sadistic rants" on the subject, even when people throw actual facts in your face.

Honestly, my conscience won't let me pin this on "unstable, deeply miserable people who need this kind of outlet just to get a momentary mental break."

Seriously, go see a therapist. And regardless of what Elvis Presley and those other Flat Earthers tell you, do not go drinking urine. Flat Earth health advice is dangerous as hell—it can literally kill you.

Daniel Chase13 said:🤣

Don't act like you don't see what's happening. Stop playing dumb.

It’s pretty obvious who holds those dark, morbid convictions about consuming human flesh—whether we're talking about infants or the deceased.

There's a certain group of people who seem to share the same mindset as Richard Dawkins—they're obsessed with breaking every taboo and pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable regarding cannibalism.

Seriously, even if you already realized all this was just fake news from some trashy tabloid or a bunch of Trump fanatics (or both), are you really still playing dumb?
And let's not forget how hypocritically you dodge any mention of the Eucharist. By definition, that’s actual cannibalism, but I guess as a Catholic, you're too embarrassed to admit that's a core part of your faith. Where does this, to quote you, insane urge to spread lies about other people come from? Is it just a way to distract everyone from your own massive shortcomings?

You spent all that time hyping up your idol Elvis Presley and his buddy Dave Murphy, who literally drinks and washes in his own urine. Now you're just being a coward, hiding behind fake stories about everyone else.

Hannah Alvarez2 said:This post is screaming neurodivergence.

Pure cognitive dissonance right there. People who are blinded like him just don't give a damn about actual evidence.

Daniel Chase13 said:🤣

Oh, absolutely not.

And honestly, how many times have we seen this? It’s the same old pattern where they try to dig Dawkins out of another embarrassing situation—which isn't surprising given his followers—right after he's gone and revealed his own morbid side (his views on mild pedophilia, his support for aborting unborn children with Down syndrome, and so on...).

On a related note, this Swedish scientist who claims to be an "expert" on saving the planet and the human race recently suggested eating the flesh of deceased humans—he even mentioned he was personally open to trying human meat himself. https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/scient...rce=NYPTwitter

They're being exposed more and more frequently these days.

What kind of planet-saving expert? Magnus Soderlund is just pushing marketing! Get real.

And you still haven't told me why you're so obsessed with promoting Elvis Presley, a guy who's a proven liar.

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't the slightest clue.

Actually, I was wondering—has that specific crowd of atheists who follow Richard Dawkins finally taken his advice to start eating human flesh to break some social taboos, or are they still just sitting around waiting for the opportunity?
https://creation.com/why-does-richar...eat-human-meat

And what about those eco-warrior atheists or the neo-pagans—the ones convinced they're saving the planet—have they actually started snacking on babies to lower CO2 levels like they once suggested?

Why are you so obsessed with sponsoring Elvis Presley and all his nonsense? And please, spare me the "I'm just responding to provocations" excuse again. Honestly, more than half of your posts here are nothing but links to his videos without even a shred of actual substance. That’s not a discussion; it’s just straight-up advertising.

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't the slightest clue.

Actually, I was wondering—has that specific crowd of atheists who follow Richard Dawkins finally taken his advice to start eating human flesh to break some social taboos, or are they still just sitting around waiting for the opportunity?
https://creation.com/why-does-richar...eat-human-meat

And what about those eco-warrior atheists or the neo-pagans—the ones convinced they're saving the planet—have they actually started snacking on babies to lower CO2 levels like they once suggested?

Taken out of context—which isn't exactly news when you're dealing with a site like creation.com.
First off, let's talk ethics here. I honestly think Dawkins was just poking the bear by trolling vegetarians who claim they won't eat meat because the animals "didn't consent" to being eaten. It’s such a reach. We're talking about hypothetical lab-grown meat here—stuff that was never even part of a living, breathing organism that could actually have an opinion or "refuse" to be consumed. It’s a total non-starter, and frankly, it's a weirdly circular argument to throw at vegetarians.
Then there's the science side of things: look, Dawkins is a biologist through and through. He’s well aware of the whole spectrum of health risks—like prion diseases—that kick in when any species starts snacking on meat from its own kind. Because he actually understands those biological red flags, he’d never seriously suggest something like that.
Look, I wasn't actually making a serious proposal here.

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't the slightest clue.

Actually, I was wondering—has that specific crowd of atheists who follow Richard Dawkins finally taken his advice to start eating human flesh to break some social taboos, or are they still just sitting around waiting for the opportunity?
https://creation.com/why-does-richar...eat-human-meat

And what about those eco-warrior atheists or the neo-pagans—the ones convinced they're saving the planet—have they actually started snacking on babies to lower CO2 levels like they once suggested?

Look, you’re starting to sound desperate now. That woman in the video isn't some "concerned atheist neo-pagan" or whatever nonsense you're trying to spin. She’s actually a member of that right-wing, pro-Trump group called LaRouche PAC. They literally bragged about sending her there just to troll Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Do I even need to point out that the whole crowd is basically a collection of conspiracy theorists?

Alright, let's get back to this Flat Earther who’s out here bragging about drinking his own urine, washing his face with it, and pitching it as some kind of wellness hack because he supposedly "knows the human body better than anyone." He even went as far as writing a book on the subject. Now, Elvis Presley is out here praising him as some brilliant mastermind and a pioneer of the Flat Earth movement. Since you were the one pushing that video featuring both of them, I gotta ask: does that mean you’re actually backing David Murphy's medical "expertise"?

Daniel Chase13 said:A continuation of what Elvis Presley shared from Grand Central Terminal https://www.facebook.com/duspara.elv...6802233983778/

That’s David Murphy right there. I wonder if everyone headed out for a drink with the guest of honor after this wrapped up?

Bryan King3 said:Well, I actually had the "pleasure" of having that exact conversation with him at the Amazon book fair.
Honestly? He isn't worth the time.
The guy is narrow-minded and, frankly, quite dim.
He tries to use this twisted version of "logic" to debunk massive scientific breakthroughs.
It’s all based on his own bizarre, warped interpretation of one specific version of the Bible he’s picked out.
The whole thing is just absurd—he’s trying to deny established science while simultaneously relying on modern scientific achievements to make his point, like using Photoshop, computers, and the internet...

It’s not him who's stupid or limited—it’s his target audience. He found a niche, packaged a product, and now he's cashing in.

Bryan King3 said:Well, I actually had the "pleasure" of having that exact conversation with him at the Amazon book fair.
Honestly? He isn't worth the time.
The guy is narrow-minded and, frankly, quite dim.
He tries to use this twisted version of "logic" to debunk massive scientific breakthroughs.
It’s all based on his own bizarre, warped interpretation of one specific version of the Bible he’s picked out.
The whole thing is just absurd—he’s trying to deny established science while simultaneously relying on modern scientific achievements to make his point, like using Photoshop, computers, and the internet...

And it's all just a hustle to sell books filled with lies, banking on people's ignorance and, let's be real, the sheer laziness of folks who don't feel like actually doing the research to find out the truth.

Daniel Chase13 said:Suggestion:

Why don't some of you who find him so grating just reach out to Presley privately? I don't mean just catching him in passing at a Barnes & Noble booth—I mean actually setting aside some time to sit down, grab a coffee, and get to know the man behind the persona. You might honestly be pleasantly surprised by what you find. 🤷

That would only work if he were a reasonable, honest human being. But Elvis Presley is just a cocky liar. He proves it every single time he drops a new video that I film myself (so, before anyone starts claiming I'm using "creative editing" to make him look bad).

On top of that, he’s gone on record several times saying he won't even bother debating anyone who doesn't have at least a PhD. He acts like he’s somehow superior to everyone else, playing the smartest guy in the room and trying to prove it by insulting and belittling people. Honestly, how are you supposed to have a conversation with someone who—as you so perfectly put it—is driven by a mindless, pathological hatred and this desperate need to poison the public? It’s honestly borderline psychiatric. How can you talk sense to someone who tries to mask their own moral and spiritual emptiness by attacking everyone around them, when all they're doing is making themselves look even worse?

Daniel Chase13 said:Just a few of his critics because honestly, a sane, well-adjusted person would never write the kind of absolute garbage that some of his detractors put out there. There are some seriously disturbed people out there. 😢

It’s pretty funny how you constantly dodge calling out Duspara in the same way.
You were posting basically the same stuff on YouTube as "KK KK" (keeping initials private, obviously).
This level of detachment from reality—this cognitive dissonance you've got going on—is enough to warrant a session with a professional psychologist or psychiatrist.

Daniel Chase13 said:If you want to talk about screaming, ask him. 🤷

How can you say you don't know? You're constantly pushing his lies and insults (and throwing in your own) like you're his official spokesperson on this forum.

Daniel Chase13 said:The guy just keeps doing his thing every single day, whether people like it or not.

That's because, just like you, he doesn't have a shred of conscience. Like someone already pointed out, he isn't doing this out of religious conviction; he's doing it for the money. He found a target audience and he's selling them his... his product. And while he's at it, he doesn't hesitate to publicly insult anyone who questions him on YouTube, Facebook, or even on Fox News.

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't glorified anyone except the one true God, Jesus Christ. I have no reason to worship anyone else, nor did I even start this thread about Elvis Presley—but since it's already underway, I'm participating.

Given that most people here seem to be criticizing him, I'm simply pointing out a reality: some (not all, mind you) of the comments on Elvis Presley's YouTube channel were so incredibly mindless and malicious that it’s obvious they came from people struggling with serious mental health issues. A mentally healthy, stable, and mature individual just wouldn't write something like that.

And yeah, it clearly eats at him that they've been sanctioned, which is why he keeps doubling down on his ways.
He's finding other ways to fund his life, because obviously, he has to feed himself and his family every single day.
At the end of the day, he couldn't care less what people think of him.

So you’re actually out here promoting him and his videos? You’re acting like he’s some "fascinating" guy who’s just "full of insight" and dropping all these "solid points." Give me a break.
So you’re calling his critics "mentally unstable" or "pathological haters" and all that crap?

Are you his official PR agent or just some massive fanboy?

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't glorified anyone except the one true God, Jesus Christ. I have no reason to worship anyone else, nor did I even start this thread about Elvis Presley—but since it's already underway, I'm participating.

Given that most people here seem to be criticizing him, I'm simply pointing out a reality: some (not all, mind you) of the comments on Elvis Presley's YouTube channel were so incredibly mindless and malicious that it’s obvious they came from people struggling with serious mental health issues. A mentally healthy, stable, and mature individual just wouldn't write something like that.

And yeah, it clearly eats at him that they've been sanctioned, which is why he keeps doubling down on his ways.
He's finding other ways to fund his life, because obviously, he has to feed himself and his family every single day.
At the end of the day, he couldn't care less what people think of him.

Look, a grown man shouldn't be out here calling women "cows on two legs," labeling every single scientist as some kind of "evil Satanist," or branding all atheists as "morally bankrupt." You don't go around telling preschool teachers they’re "incapable of raising kids" or claiming their entire career is just "brainwashing the youth." But somehow, Elvis Presley is back at it again, hitting every single one of those ridiculous points like he's checking items off a grocery list. It’s honestly exhausting.

So, can you actually explain why you keep looping back to that same exact paragraph in this thread? Who are you even trying to convince here? Honestly, anyone who’s watched even a handful of Elvis Presley's videos can see right through it—you're clearly using that repetitive script to describe Elvis, not his critics.

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't glorified anyone except the one true God, Jesus Christ. I have no reason to worship anyone else, nor did I even start this thread about Elvis Presley—but since it's already underway, I'm participating.

Given that most people here seem to be criticizing him, I'm simply pointing out a reality: some (not all, mind you) of the comments on Elvis Presley's YouTube channel were so incredibly mindless and malicious that it’s obvious they came from people struggling with serious mental health issues. A mentally healthy, stable, and mature individual just wouldn't write something like that.

And yeah, it clearly eats at him that they've been sanctioned, which is why he keeps doubling down on his ways.
He's finding other ways to fund his life, because obviously, he has to feed himself and his family every single day.
At the end of the day, he couldn't care less what people think of him.

So, why does he start screaming "SLANDER!!!" every single time someone even breathes in his direction the wrong way?