So, if you take embryonic development, fossil records, homologous structures, molecular biology, regional biodiversity, and direct observations spanning multiple insect generations... and then you just toss all that onto the table at once? It’s getting a little ridiculous to ignore.
The laryngeal nerve. For some people, evidence just doesn't count as proof. It’s honestly pointless to even bother discussing the concept of a logical process when you're dealing with someone who actually buys into the Flat Earth theory. 🤣
Daniel Chase13 said:It went from Duspara's initial pitch—which grew to $83 the point where he was basically offering the one thing that would provide undeniable, unquestionable scientific proof of macro-evolution—to running as an actual commercial on NBC, even during prime Sunday slots right before Stankovićev's show.
For over six months, Duspara kept ramping up his offer, and yet, not a single student or professor specializing in evolution from Harvard University, nor anyone from the Ruđer Institute, or any other evolutionary biologist out there, could produce actual evidence to support their stance.
Honestly, it was hilarious—people were practically laughing until they cried reading the whining, the grumbling, and the angry outbursts from evolutionists in letters and messages sent to the newsroom, all because they couldn't provide that definitive proof of macro-evolution.
There were even some desperate evolutionists who almost sounded like they were begging, writing things like, "I want that money!" or "I need that money!"
And then, of course, there were the honest ones—the evolutionists who openly admitted that absolutely no one in the world can provide indisputable, unquestionable proof of macro-evolution.
😲
So, what exactly are we looking at here? Is this some kind of micro-evolutionary theory now?