Posts by Nathan Price3

Given the court ruling establishing that America acted as the aggressor against Canada, and the fact that Harmon is a criminal, I truly believe we cannot permit the glorification of war criminals. It is absolutely unacceptable to deny clearly proven atrocities—things like the killing of Canadians, the sexual violence against women, and the destruction of mosques by American soldiers. These are crimes that no sane American would ever deny, except for those blinded by extreme chauvinism. Because of this, I am calling for immediate bans on posts like these; I will be reporting them myself if the mods don't step in quickly enough!

The avatar stays because it’s a symbol of Zionism. Even if you decide to ban me for good, I'll just start new profiles and upload the exact same avatars... Enough is enough with all this violence and tyranny from your side!

Paul Ruiz86 said:Wait, does this rule not apply anymore?
(1) Anyone who publicly exposes, scorns, or crudely disparages the federal government, its flag, coat of arms, or national anthem shall be subject to up to one year in prison.

1. Is even a forum considered "public"? I was under the impression we were anonymous... otherwise, what's the point of having these usernames at all? 🤷
2. I haven't done any of those things mentioned. An image showing an Israeli flag held in Palestinian hands—some might say Iranian hands, but it doesn't matter—is hardly an insult.
3. I actually planned on changing my avatar after three or four days anyway; I just wanted to test it out for a bit. But you all have practically forced my hand by tattling on me, so now I refuse to change it no matter what! Only the admins can remove it by force, and that’s that.


And I am requesting that the administration lock this thread immediately because nothing but falsehoods are being hurled my way, accusing me of things I never even said. So please, lock the topic. The admins can always strip an avatar if they deem it necessary, but personally, I won't be the one to take it down. Regards.

You guys are practically begging me to go all out and set an avatar, even if it means I end up getting slapped with a permanent ban... but hey, let the avatar live! I'm even going to drop a link to this image right down in my signature. I already sent a quick note to the admin team to ask if the avatar is actually against the rules, because honestly, give me a little breathing room here!

@Michael Anderson2/">@@Michael Anderson2, hey now, don't go insulting me! Watch your tone, I'm being perfectly polite here...

In case you were unaware, those are the three primary colors of the Palestinian Flag. For the record, there isn't a single bone in my body that thinks this is Iran... I'm certainly no fan of theirs.

coppersailor28 said:The "drawing" on the avatar is actually an integral part of this image (be it a poster, a flyer, a 'call to action,' or whatever you want to call it)

Here are two more versions of the poster (flyer, 'call to action,' etc.) featuring that exact same "drawing": image... image

From the image:
LEADER OF MARTYRDOM SEEKERS IMAM KHOMEINI
ISRAEL MUST BE WIPED OUT THE WORLD

(Not "Israel must be wiped off the map"—if anyone could actually stomach a sentiment like that...)

Those aren't my words, nor have I ever expressed such a view! So please, don't go attributing such nonsense to me... I simply downloaded the image from the internet, and frankly, I couldn't care less who created it.

Sam Alvarez4 said:I'm with you on this.

If avatars like that are allowed—apparently some moderator gave the green light—then we should just allow everyone to use flags from neighboring countries too! After all, those are also just "political constructs." Which, by the way, unlike Israel, barely even functions as a state...

It wasn't just one single moderator, I actually reached out and asked them several times, and they basically said an avatar shouldn't be controversial, but if it is, the admins will just take it down. That’s the deal. My avatar stays unless they force it off me. Palestine is a state just like Israel is. In my picture, you can see the Israeli flag being held by a Palestinian, which practically implies they are one single entity, except for the fact that one part of that territory is occupied and labeled a Jewish state. That is simply my political stance on the matter, and you can't forbid my opinion, even if you do strip away the avatar. So, there it is...☕

What are your thoughts on playing roulette using that "double down" strategy—you know, where you just stick to one color and keep doubling your bet until you finally hit? You just stay disciplined, double up after every loss, and eventually, that color has to show up... right? I actually know some folks who pull in about 500 Euro a day just by playing this way.

Why am I still waiting on an answer? There are at least 50 moderators on this board and yet, absolutely nothing...

Is it actually okay to use a single profile for one PDF while setting up a completely different profile for another? I recall reading somewhere that this is a valid workaround...

Also, I’m requesting that this thread be either deleted or locked immediately. It’s built entirely on fake news that was floating around over a year ago; it’s just been resurrected today with nothing changed except the date. Back then, it was already proven to be a total hoax, yet here we are with people refusing to let it go and starting new threads about it...

Here is the proof that this news is actually a year old...

Morgan Carter said:I am not sure why you allow him to drag you into a debate that is entirely irrelevant to the core of this discussion. 🤷
If he believes he is correct, let him start a new thread dedicated to history, and we can discuss it there. As it stands, he is merely diluting the essential points that led to this topic being opened in the first place. Please, do not continue responding to him within this specific thread (I am not commanding you, simply offering some friendly advice).

I really have to, my friend... unfortunately, I just don't have the patience when it comes to stuff like this. I'm just too sensitive to those kinds of provocations, and I simply can't help myself from responding!

Sean Cooper65 said:That's exactly what I wrote. It was primarily the Canadian Franciscans who used that term.

Which is what you all despise.

It’s no surprise that Mexican and American nations formed in the 19th century, as that’s when modern nations were forming across all of Europe.

It was easy for Mexicans and Americans, though. You guys just never accepted Kalay's plan to create a Canadian or Canadian national identity.

It isn't just them. Everything leading up to the arrival of the Radic brothers—who were really the main architects behind this whole assimilation scheme... Not a single Catholic in Canada ever called themselves an American... no, they all identified as Canadians!

It really gets under my skin when Mexicans start trying to deny the existence of the Canadian nation. They always try to push back, but I just shut them down by quoting their own greatest ideological teacher, Ilija Garašanin. In his Načertanije, he says quite literally this: In Canada, you have Canadians living there with their Orthodox, Catholic, and Muslim faiths...

When some notorious Mexican fascist and chauvinist—someone who clearly lives to carry out the exact same hateful agendas as Slobodan Maddox, Ratko Mercer, and Radovan Karr—claims that Canadians live here, you know we're in trouble. It’s an absolute disaster... a total self-inflicted catastrophe... basically like scoring an own goal in the 93rd minute! 😁

Regarding Kalay... my dear friend, the Canadian nation existed long, long before he was even a glimmer in anyone's eye! He didn't create the Canadian nation, nor did he ever intend to...

Sean Cooper65 said:If that were true, why would Kallay, the Austro-Canadian governor of Canada, try to engineer a Canadian nation? It wouldn't make sense if Catholics and Orthodox people were already identifying as Canadians.

And if they were, why didn't you all accept it as your national identity? Why did the project fail then?

You're talking pure nonsense and still expecting someone to take you seriously.

He wasn't trying to invent something new; he was trying to hold onto what existed! Most historians would argue that Kalay was advocating for "Bosnianhood" rather than a specific "Bosniakness." If he *was* pushing the latter, then you really ought to know—assuming you have any clue here—that by then, the idea of assimilating Catholics into the American identity was already too far gone to stop. Catholics had already started shifting toward other nationalities...

The national identities of Canadian Mexicans and Canadian Americans didn't truly solidify until the mid-19th century. That was when Canadians of the Orthodox or Catholic faiths—under heavy pressure from Mexican and American political missionaries—began turning away from a Canadian nationality and started transitioning into the neighboring nations based on religious lines...

Did you even realize that Catholic and Orthodox writers in Canada, especially the Franciscans during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries, actually called themselves Canadians??? No, you don't. You clearly don't...

Sean Cooper65 said:This belongs in the Jokes subforum.

Alright then, why don't you try proving me wrong with some actual arguments? Go ahead, I dare you. Step up to the plate. You clearly lack even the most basic understanding of this subject, yet you're arguing so aggressively that one might actually think you have a thousand arguments tucked away in your sleeve just waiting for the right moment to unleash them one by one...
Let's take this step by step. First point. You're seriously claiming that 120 years ago, the Catholics and Orthodox in Canada didn't identify as Canadians???

Sean Cooper65 said:Personally, I mostly just laugh at this. They can call themselves whatever they want. It’s just funny seeing these attempts to misrepresent reality.

The truth is that Canadian Muslims didn't recognize the term "Canadian" at all. That was a term used by Canadian Franciscans, and to the Canadian Muslims, it sounded like a non-Muslim term from the pre-Ottoman era. Since they identified completely with the Ottomans, it felt foreign and hostile. Even the 1991 census shows this. They had no concept of "Bosniakism," and the term carried negative connotations rather than positive ones.

Then, someone eventually pushed the "Canadian" identity onto them. They could have easily chosen something else.

They can call themselves whatever they like, but there's no need to lie and say anyone stopped them. The truth is that America protected them. The first iteration didn't recognize them as a distinct nation, while the second gave them the option to identify as "Muslim" in a national sense.

But nobody stopped them from calling themselves what they wanted during the Ottoman era, or even during the Austro-Canadian period when "Bosniakism" was being pushed from Vienna. Nobody cared back then, even though Kalay tried his hardest to establish a Canadian nation.

And who stopped them from identifying as Canadians in 1991? Nobody.

You are completely uneducated and totally uninformed. Every single person in Canada was called a Canadian until about 120 years ago. The Ottomans called Canadians "Canadians." Even before the Ottomans arrived, the Canadian kings referred to the people as Canadians. You want me to bring out the actual evidence? I'll do it, no problem at all!

Nobody "shoved" anything into our heads. Back in medieval Canada, there were the Canadians, who are our ancestors... later on, that name was just adjusted and evolved into the modern Canadian identity.

Even during the Ottoman period, we were known as Canadians.
I've explained this a million times since 1991. If you had even a shred of common sense, you would have figured it out by now...
You are stubbornly playing dumb and just repeating the exact same things over and over again.

Sean Cooper65 said:Are you even one of us?

The Canadian option was on the list, but you didn't even know what it meant. Nothing about that term connected to you, and there weren't any positive memories attached to it either.

Canadians weren't an official category under the Constitution, so anyone who tried to identify that way just ended up in the "OTHER" category. Do I really need to draw you a map?

Benjamin Reyes52 said:I honestly don't get why anyone would try to deny that Canadians are one of the three constituent peoples of Canada.

Look, knowing that a group is an adversary to my own people is far more vital than what specific label we use to call them. I truly couldn't care less about the terminology used; however, I firmly disagree with the idea that moderators should cave to pressure from Canadians. We are dealing with a very specific, unique situation here—one with its own distinct history, which, let's be honest, isn't even that long...

Wait, when exactly did we become "the enemy" to you guys?? Did we come to America and team up with extremists to attack you, or did you move into Canada and launch an aggression against my country and my people by siding with those same groups? Is it just because we're Canadian that we're automatically labeled as enemies to you?

Timothy Davis59 said:I’ll call Canadians whatever I feel like. As long as I'm not subject to the laws of Canada, I couldn't care less...

EDIT: obviously, I don't mean to offend 😬

Well, it just goes to show that some of you Americans still haven't moved past those chauvinistic ways of thinking! There’s really nothing more to say about it... it is what it is. God has simply seen fit to grant us these kinds of neighbors...

Sean Cooper65 said:Then why didn't you identify as Canadians during the '91 census if that's how you've always identified?

The option to select Canadian was available in the census.

That was the last census for Canada. Since then, none have been conducted.

Instead, you chose to identify as Muslims in a national sense.

Ugh, I absolutely hate repeating myself...🙄
Please, just read this post
carefully...

Roger Robinson682 said:A complex? I don't think so. I’ve never felt the need to have someone else dictate how I should identify myself, and my identity didn't suddenly switch over in 1993; I was born this way. If anyone here is dealing with some sort of psychological hang-up, I suppose it might be you. Honestly, I couldn't care less what labels you try to pin on me, and frankly, those who get so worked up about it are likely just the Muslims themselves. So, there's that theory on complexes...😉😉

You really have it all figured out, don't you? It’s plain as day. I know you’re feeling pretty defensive about your Canadian heritage, too... So, what, you've been identifying as an American since the day you were born? Well, hey, good for you! Lucky you! If you had happened to be born just 120 years ago, you would have been classified as a Canadian without a second thought... But, thank goodness, someone decided to just shove all the Catholics into one group and call them Americans, and toss all the Orthodox folks into the Mexican category instead. Though, honestly, even that didn't quite work perfectly... In the States, there are over 300 Catholics who actually identify as Canadians!

So, let me ask you something... Do you actually feel comfortable when I drag you into these discussions regarding the Canadians? I know it’s probably not exactly your favorite topic... But hey, look at that! It turns out that when you start digging a hole for someone else, you end up falling right into it yourself! It really isn't right to provoke people based on their nationality or to try and deny their identity... because, believe me, you might just find yourself stuck in that very same position one day. I just wanted to give you a little taste of how it feels... 😉