Steven Young23 said:In all honesty, I find it baffling that in this day and age, one still needs to be convinced that an apartment should come with at least one parking spot—whether it's for the resident or for guests arriving by car. You'll eventually realize the necessity once you get older and children start visiting.
You are conflating the purpose of the loan (in this case, residential) with the method of securing repayment (the mortgage). If you are co-owners of an undivided interest, there is no distinct individual unit upon which a bank can place a lien; the lien applies to the property as a whole. This is precisely why you need the signature and consent of all co-owners to secure a mortgage—it is to place an encumbrance on the entire structure. Of course, loans are available without a mortgage, though they typically involve much smaller amounts. Regardless, it would be prudent to consult with some local banks; it costs nothing but a bit of your time.
So, I actually had a fully finalized, permitted, and approved project for two garages on my lot—all set before I even pulled the trigger on the attic remodel and rezoning. Total stroke of luck, right? I had absolutely no clue that rule even existed in the local zoning code... what a joke.
Look, I agree—garages are great. But they aren't some absolute requirement just to build a multi-story house. If they pushed for that extra space, my guess is it was just to keep people from choking up the street by parking everywhere. But honestly? That’s exactly the headache on my block. Everyone has a garage or a driveway, yet you still have to play a game of slalom just to drive down the street because everyone parks on the curb anyway—usually because their garages are stuffed with junk they don't need. Then, when winter hits, you can't even get a snowplow through the neighborhood because of the mess.
Look, check this out—the house has three separate units, but officially? There isn't a single garage or parking spot on record. When it comes time to actually subdivide the property and file the paperwork, I’m seriously worried about how that's going to play out...
Steven Young23 said:In all honesty, I find it baffling that in this day and age, one still needs to be convinced that an apartment should come with at least one parking spot—whether it's for the resident or for guests arriving by car. You'll eventually realize the necessity once you get older and children start visiting.
You are conflating the purpose of the loan (in this case, residential) with the method of securing repayment (the mortgage). If you are co-owners of an undivided interest, there is no distinct individual unit upon which a bank can place a lien; the lien applies to the property as a whole. This is precisely why you need the signature and consent of all co-owners to secure a mortgage—it is to place an encumbrance on the entire structure. Of course, loans are available without a mortgage, though they typically involve much smaller amounts. Regardless, it would be prudent to consult with some local banks; it costs nothing but a bit of your time.
What happens if all the co-owners sign that mortgage insurance consent for the person who actually took out the loan? Now, let’s say the house gets split into three separate condos in the meantime, everyone gets their names on the titles, but the bank doesn't get paid—so now she’s basically sitting on the whole property. Which part does she actually have the right to lien? Just her share, or the entire thing?
Benjamin Taylor6 said:Don't tell me you're actually worried about catching a case of the Vukić family syndrome: 😬
It all comes down to the bank's requirements. If the property isn't legally subdivided into individual units, then yeah, it's standard procedure for every co-owner to sign off on a mortgage covering the entire structure.
But, if the house is properly subdivided, then the mortgage only applies to that specific unit.
If that turns out to be true, we’re looking at a total disaster... 🤦