Republican Party - General Discussion
in Political Scene ·
darkhawk30 said:Sure, the Republican Party is the dominant force here, but if you want to talk about actual talent or future potential, that's a different conversation entirely.
I didn't dig deep enough to pull specific data comparing 2007 to today, but what I did find is interesting:
In 2008, they had 240,000 members, but by 2016 (according to Wikipedia), that number dropped to 210,384.
article, Should modern parties even bother with membership?
(page 23; I didn't read the whole thing, just looked at the numbers)
Their peak was back in 2004, when membership hit 432,000.
Membership has cratered significantly. That’s good news in one sense, but the fact that nothing else has actually changed is the bad news.
Assuming it wasn't just a massive wave of deaths or people moving away, it looks like roughly 200,000 members just... evaporated.
And let's be real—about 90% of those members probably rely on the party just to keep the lights on—whether they're working in some government agency or running a business that depends on state contracts.