Posts by Ashley Wells85

frozengull2 said:Look, everything from paleontology (you know, paleobotany, micropaleontology, whatever) to paleogeography, paleoclimatology, evolutionary biology... geology, botany, zoology—basically all of embryology, genetics, anthropology, archaeology (not that I'm gonna list them all here)—none of it agrees with you.
Or even the Vedas...
Honestly, how much dirt is under your fingernails?
I gotta hand it to you though, that is some seriously "original" logic you're using to (totally dead-ass) dismiss every single science mentioned above:
"Just souls moving around..."

Give me a break...

Don't worry about it, it's fine... There's always plenty more where that came from.

Oh, so they happen to align with Darwinian theory? How convenient for them...

Anyway, do you actually have a coherent response that stays on topic?
Because, at the end of the day, I'm looking for a constructive conversation rather than just a debate over whether I'm right or wrong. Personally, I'm happy to admit I'm mistaken once I'm presented with an answer that's actually intelligent and logical.

Michael Gonzalez77 said:The "Idea of Man" is essentially a genetic embryo containing all phylogenetic stages in a latent sense. However, its actual development starts at a rudimentary level. In this context, humanity has been on Earth for 5 million years, and our progression from then until now involves evolving toward the highest dimensions of existence, while also experiencing a curious "fall" back into the initial dimension where we currently reside. Before we developed multi-dimensionally—before consciousness crystallized for perspective-driven growth—humanity branched out in four directions. Three of those paths were non-perspective, including modern primates, which never reached the point of acquiring the specific energetic characteristics humans possess today. We gained those through multidimensional evolution (specifically through the three-layered astral body and an energetic structure referred to as the Soul—not to be confused with the aspect translated as Atma, which encompasses both organic and inorganic worlds, nor the light body which facilitates unrestrained creativity). So, man didn't evolve from monkeys; rather, humanity is the natural flowering of cosmic evolution. We carry the entire phylogenesis of material living beings within us, embodying the full experience of the cosmos regarding the development of material life. This evolution didn't just play out on Earth moving from inorganic to organic as the Darwinian hypothesis suggests; instead, this development unfolded within a cosmic context over eons and eons (what we perceive as infinite time), starting from the accidental emergence of matter and leading up to the appearance of beings with crystallized or complete consciousness. This applies to the "Idea of Man" and other advanced cosmic civilizations, whose shared developmental hallmark is a Collective Consciousness. Anything below that is merely preparation for creating that collective awareness—though in humans, due to free will and the capacity for creative growth, we see the rare phenomenon of developing flawed mindsets and practical self-sabotage.

The Soul is one. Fundamentally, there is no such thing as "soul migration." That’s just an illusion of separation caused by the weight of accumulated impressions—the idea that the Soul is this, or that, or a stone, a plant, an insect, a fish, a bird, an animal, or a human. What looks like "migration" is actually just the assimilation of a new physical medium driven by existing energy and the mental envelope where stored impressions exist, pushing to manifest and exhaust themselves.

Thanks for the response. I mostly get it, but give me some time to let it sink in...

Michael Gonzalez77 said:But they certainly existed in a rudimentary state, far below the level of today's primates.

Could you clarify that?

What kind of timeframe are we talking about here?

Because from what I understand, no species currently living on this planet actually evolved from some other preceding form. Sure, human genetics share certain touchpoints with other species, but that doesn't mean we branched off from primates. It’s more like a soul migration...

The Vedas hold the lion's share of meaningful data regarding the universe, the nature of existence—from the birth and decay of physical forms to the migration of the soul...
As for the Ramin Bridge, Dwarka, Kurukshetra, and those other locations mentioned in the books we discussed earlier, there's a very high probability they actually existed. I recall watching a documentary a few years back that investigated the specific region where the battle at Kurukshetra supposedly took place; they cited evidence, I think it was some kind of radiation signature or similar findings.
Basically, it's been established that a significant conflict did occur there, which aligns with what's described in the Bhagavad Gita Quote

casualtiger2 said:Talk about unfair.
All that wisdom was handed out maybe 2,000 to 5,000 years ago and that's basically it.
Even God seems to have stopped checking in with the apostles.😢

Just because it isn't official doesn't mean He isn't communicating...

frozengull2 said:Back when humans were basically just apes (if not earlier).
Old enough to make your head ache from all this ink...
Honestly, wouldn't be surprised if that era also produced the legendary: "haiku, haiku... damn it all"...

Humans were never monkeys.