CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › crimsonranger3 › Posts

Posts by crimsonranger3

43 posts shown.

Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Having spent two weeks entirely on my own, I have zero patience for any of you. You can go bury yourselves for all I care, but don't you dare advocate for stripping innocent people of their freedom.
If you happen to be antisocial weirdos, that’s your business—not everyone is like that.

All of this is happening because of people like you who insist on living in opposition to nature.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
That occurred to me while I was there. A contact of mine mentioned they were checking on him at 7:00 AM; frankly, there is no way I would be out of bed by 7:00. Not when I'm stuck indoors like this.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Is it actually reasonable to throw people in jail for 14 days?
You mention a positive test result, so go ahead and justify why my incarceration was fine, but a negative one wouldn't be.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Lawrence Reed3 said:I guess you'd have a point there. It really isn't right when the authorities just drop the ball and fail to actually notify the people who are supposed to be under those orders.

I know, but I really don't feel like messing around with the cops and dealing with the legal system later on.
Jerry Anderson87 said:The system doesn't clear you until the 19th. Also, if you happen to get pulled over, the police will see in their database that you're officially under quarantine orders...

So, I guess I’m stuck here for the rest of the day, then.
Yeah... 😁

Gregory Thompson3 said:This might sound like an absurd question, but I figured I’d ask anyway.

What does the "rule of law" actually have to do with the fact that you only receive a notification if your test comes back positive?
Do people seriously need some notarized, official document with a government seal just to justify staying home for two weeks because they tested positive for the virus?

I didn't receive an invitation or anything. I just got a call from my contact letting me know they listed me as a reference.
On top of that, I tested positive for nothing—I came back negative.
True, the only thing keeping me in town was that fine from... $2667It’s just like... $167Nobody’s going to see me at home for two weeks straight, especially since all these mandates and recommendations are nothing more than a complete farce.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Honestly, it’s a lot easier than the anxiety I feel whenever I see a police cruiser roll by. 😁
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Lawrence Reed3 said:Wait, hold on—you were the one who called? So nobody actually reached out to you? Like, if you hadn't made that call, you wouldn't have even known? Honestly, if you hadn't checked, you could've just gone about your business without a single worry. That’s how it works—anyone could be stuck in isolation without ever realizing it! Ugh, well, hang in there for one more day. It's Sunday, so just grab some popcorn, hop on Netflix, and chill.

Yeah, nobody notified me. I called just to be safe, because I didn't want to head down to the local pub if I was officially on the list.
I've been chilling at home for nine days now; I'm not looking forward to a tenth unless I absolutely have to.😁
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Jessm, I called my primary care physician on Friday. She mentioned she’d be writing the note starting from a certain date—not 14 days out, I think—through the 18th.
Now I’m stuck debating whether I should actually bother heading out tomorrow or not.😁
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
driftingranger2 said:I'm pretty sure that includes the 18th.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 via Reddit

😢
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
That’s what I thought. I called my doctor yesterday and she said she'd have the paperwork sent over by 6:00 PM.
Suppose for some reason that 6:00 PM deadline passes and I get pulled over during a routine traffic stop—will the police actually see my quarantine status when they run my info through their system?
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Sunday, Oct 4th
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
If my quarantine lasts until the 18th, does that mean I can head out on the 18th, or am I stuck inside that day too?
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
20k deaths in New York City represents just 0.23%.
More people die from freaking seagull attacks.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Gregory Thompson3: "Quote:"
neonpuma30 said:Wait, what kind of math is that? How does 1.5% of 4 million equal 4,200?🤔

That's 1.5% of 280,000—so, 4,200 infected.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Just because you (and most of the crowd here) are total couch potatoes with zero social life doesn't mean everyone else is, or that this lifestyle is actually healthy for the human body and mind.

It’s why everyone is dealing with chronic ailments and carrying an extra twenty pounds—they just sit there scrolling or watching TV all day. Not to mention the mental health crisis. Society is spiraling, so I'm hardly surprised when people mock those who actually try to live in harmony with nature.

Have you seen Wall-E?
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
I found a figure for Austria. It’s at 7%.
Let's assume the situation here is similar, with 280,000 infections. Based on data from the CDC since March, the mortality rate sits at 1.5%.
With a population of 4 million, you could expect roughly 4,200 deaths.
How many people have been left jobless? Around 60,000, right?
And how many people are effectively "dying" because they can't find work? I'd imagine a massive percentage of those 60,000.

In my view, it is far worse when 60,000 people go hungry and subsequently die, compared to 4,200 deaths—especially when many of those would have passed away regardless.

As for the media and the politicians? They're both absolute trash. Just a bunch of people incapable of contributing anything useful to society, so they settle for what they do.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Gregory Thompson3 said:So, here’s my two cents.
Since I actually had to quarantine twice because of COVID, I figured I’d share my experience.

The first time, I had this persistent cough. My manager suggested I should probably get checked out, so I called the local clinic nearby and walked them through my symptoms. They set up a test for me right away, and within half an hour, I got a text with the exact time and location to head over. I went in, but the test came back negative. Even so, because of that cough, the doctor advised me to stay in isolation just in case it was some atypical strain. So, I stayed home. About 24 hours later, I got a notification from the CDC letting me know I wasn't positive.

The second time happened when I was flying back into the States. I didn't have any symptoms at all, but I still spent 14 days hunkered down at home. I didn't even bother testing since I felt fine. I just received a few automated texts from the health department—since you have to list your travel history and info when entering the country—asking me to self-isolate and to contact my doctor or the local health authorities if any symptoms popped up. That was pretty much it.

Honestly, it's not that big of a deal to stay in your apartment for 14 days if that's what's required of you.
Especially if you end up testing positive.

Psychologically speaking, humans are social creatures, and physically, our bodies are built to cover massive distances every single day.
So, spending 14 days cooped up in an apartment does more damage to my mental and physical health than three days of coughing and popping Tylenol.

The people who disagree are the same ones who comment on everything with a fatalistic "well, it is what it is" attitude.
Like my neighbor, who looks at any heavy downpour and claims, "that's just how it goes," predicting floods and mass casualties. The only difference is that with this virus, the media broadcasts that panic to everyone, fueling widespread fear.

They’re making mountains out of molehills.
I just don't understand why, even after the elections, these idiots are still enforcing these measures. Infection numbers are rising simply because more people are getting tested. They never actually released the percentage of positive cases relative to total tests, did they?

It's no wonder the world is a mess for those of us living in it...
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Nicole James said:You are drifting away from the point. I asked you how many deaths within the US would justify a specific measure according to your logic. You didn't answer.

If you ever happen to contract cancer or some sort of cardiovascular disease, I sincerely hope you stay consistent and don't bother young, healthy people with expensive treatments; instead, I hope you just wave it off, say "NATURAL SELECTION," and pass away somewhere quietly where you won't be a nuisance to anyone.

Explain to me why hospitals would actually close, especially if they start filling up with people who genuinely NEED help, rather than asymptomatic patients or people sitting there with a 102°F fever.

Maybe this isn't your genre of music, but listen to—or at least read the lyrics of—"When The Wild Wind Blows" by Iron Maiden.

Why? Because if you put a COVID patient in an ICU bed, that bed is effectively gone for any other patient. It is because those with severe symptoms requiring hospitalization (which accounts for 15 to 20 percent of confirmed cases) need to be under the supervision of specialists, and our supply of those experts is quite limited. If they become overwhelmed, you can't go to the hospital—you just stay home and hope for the best. It is because staff who were potentially exposed to COVID cannot work with other patients and must go into isolation. It is because you cannot perform heart surgery on someone and then move them to a ward where someone else has COVID, because you will likely kill them. Get it?

The new coronavirus has been spreading globally for about six months now. Your math regarding TBC is off. If we were seeing over 700 cases of TBC daily across the US—especially with an exponential growth trend—you can bet we would be dealing with incredibly strict measures...

It’s interesting how you seem to catch every single headline that implies numbers might be higher than they actually are, yet you completely overlook reports about countries downplaying infection and death rates for obvious political reasons. I honestly don't see why any government would have an incentive right now to inflate their numbers and make themselves look incompetent.

I managed to sort out my high blood pressure just by making some lifestyle adjustments. I could have easily taken the pills and played the victim, but I chose a different route.

Nicole James said:You are drifting away from the point. I asked you how many deaths within the US would justify a specific measure according to your logic. You didn't answer.

If you ever happen to contract cancer or some sort of cardiovascular disease, I sincerely hope you stay consistent and don't bother young, healthy people with expensive treatments; instead, I hope you just wave it off, say "NATURAL SELECTION," and pass away somewhere quietly where you won't be a nuisance to anyone.

Explain to me why hospitals would actually close, especially if they start filling up with people who genuinely NEED help, rather than asymptomatic patients or people sitting there with a 102°F fever.

Maybe this isn't your genre of music, but listen to—or at least read the lyrics of—"When The Wild Wind Blows" by Iron Maiden.

Why? Because if you put a COVID patient in an ICU bed, that bed is effectively gone for any other patient. It is because those with severe symptoms requiring hospitalization (which accounts for 15 to 20 percent of confirmed cases) need to be under the supervision of specialists, and our supply of those experts is quite limited. If they become overwhelmed, you can't go to the hospital—you just stay home and hope for the best. It is because staff who were potentially exposed to COVID cannot work with other patients and must go into isolation. It is because you cannot perform heart surgery on someone and then move them to a ward where someone else has COVID, because you will likely kill them. Get it?

The new coronavirus has been spreading globally for about six months now. Your math regarding TBC is off. If we were seeing over 700 cases of TBC daily across the US—especially with an exponential growth trend—you can bet we would be dealing with incredibly strict measures...

It’s interesting how you seem to catch every single headline that implies numbers might be higher than they actually are, yet you completely overlook reports about countries downplaying infection and death rates for obvious political reasons. I honestly don't see why any government would have an incentive right now to inflate their numbers and make themselves look incompetent.

So, someone who's potentially been exposed to COVID has to isolate and can't work alongside those who are actually positive?

You clearly don't realize that the reasons you've laid out are nothing more than convenient fabrications designed to justify using warm water in coronary treatments.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
wanderingbadger77 said:I guess I'll keep lying for a bit. Where do you guys even get this inspiration?
Dentists are working.
Besides, what does that even have to do with isolation.
You guys are clogging up every single thread.

The forums and society at large are being cluttered by these self-proclaimed doomsday prophets and loafers who clearly have nothing better to do with their lives. They don't have jobs, they don't have friends, and they just sit around waiting for a crisis so they finally have something to talk about.

Frank Martin2 said:You just undermined your own point by using the word "potentially" regarding those consequences.

We don't actually know much about these "potential" consequences—they are "possible," sure, but not necessarily certain.
If we’re going to split hairs, every single illness leaves some sort of mark. For all we know, the aftermath of COVID might actually be less severe than the aftermath of a bad case of the flu.

So, since we're still in the dark, why defend epidemic control measures from such a pessimistic standpoint?
Why not approach it as an optimist?

And more importantly, why not ask what negative impact these very measures will have on people? (Like stalling the healthcare system and delaying treatment for other diseases that could, frankly, be far more dangerous and lethal than COVID-19.)
Or consider the economic blow to citizens through job losses and plummeting revenue... which inevitably pushes people into high-stress situations that leave their own lasting health issues.

All this based on a big fat "maybe."

(Maybe a cow will lay an egg?)

We need to approach this from a realist's perspective. These alarmists love obsessing over data, so let them run the numbers. How many lives were actually compromised by the virus versus how many were ruined by sheer stupidity in policy-making? I personally know far too many people who lost their livelihoods—educated professionals who had spent years building careers, all gone because of these measures.
The issue isn't the virus. The problem is that people have become fundamentally decayed and negligent regarding their own well-being, and now we finally have something that exposes it.
It’s like having rotten roof beams that have been sitting there for ten years, and then a heavy snowfall hits and the whole roof collapses on you. What do you do? You blame the snow. No. The snow was just the last straw.
The people listed as having died "from COVID" were likely already at death's door or ancient to begin with. Look, I know I sound blunt, but they didn't die "from the virus"—it’s a miracle they even lived long enough to catch it.
My grandfather passed away this year at 89 from pneumonia. "Pneumonia." Apparently, the fact that he was 88 years old and everything else about his health just suddenly didn't matter anymore.
Of course, losing someone isn't easy, but let’s be realistic—you can't exactly act surprised when both your nine-month-old car and your twenty-seven-year-old one finally give up the ghost at the same time. The human body is just another machine that requires maintenance and has a built-in expiration date. Besides, there's always the question of how each individual machine was originally designed.

After everything I’ve laid out, we arrive at one conclusion: natural selection.

Nicole James As requested by silverstag24:
It’s inevitable. The same crowd that’s been trashing the task force and their protocols will be the first ones demanding accountability from them the moment hospital beds start filling up, claiming they didn't do enough.

Explain to me why they’re closing hospitals, especially if they plan on moving people who actually NEED help into them, rather than just asymptomatic patients and people running a mild fever of 102°F.

You might not be a fan of this genre, but give it a listen—or at least read the lyrics to Iron Maiden's "When The Wild Wind Blows."
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
Nicole James said:Of course. That’s why instead of jumping straight to a full-scale lockdown, the goal is to resolve things through contact isolation, masks, and limiting large gatherings... But then you have certain people who stubbornly refuse to wear masks, won't report contacts because they don't want to offend their friends, or gather en masse as if there's no tomorrow... they essentially obstruct every attempt to keep the situation under control with moderate measures.

Except that the "some" in this case is roughly a larger order of magnitude than it is with the flu...

Which is why you shouldn't board a streetcar with a basket of bees...

Since the local bars reopened, I've been at the same one at least twice a week. Never caught anything. The only positive case I was actually in contact with was a family member who happens to be a doctor. My takeaway? Limit foot traffic in clinics and hospitals, but leave the bars alone.
Additionally, I've attended large-scale events at least once a week—think MLS games, though I'm not from New York City—and, wouldn't you know it, nothing happened.

Ten years ago, I was at a funeral for a 25-year-old friend because his heart gave out after he jumped into a river. Are we going to ban swimming in rivers now?

Honestly, I don't get why, even after the elections, Stozer continues to push these specific policies, especially since more and more people are revolting against these nonsensical measures.
Quarantine Life in Coronavirus ·
I’m the guy who was talking trash about quarantine, yet here I am, having already cleared the virus thanks to my antibodies.
How did I pull it off? One day I hit a 99.5°F fever (and yeah, my eye muscles were absolutely killing me for four days straight), but my "treatment plan" consisted of a 1,000-yard swim and a 4-mile run. Why didn't I rest? Because I genuinely thought it was just a draft from an open window the day before.

The point is, it isn't the apocalypse we're being told it is. If I even bring up the concept of natural selection, half the internet starts losing their minds...

The best part? I’m still testing negative, yet I'm still stuck in isolation.🤣
At this rate, the quarantine is going to do more damage to me than the actual virus ever could.

Honestly, I can't find a word as accurate as "stupid" to describe this situation.🤣

EDIT: Does this linked news article mean I'm effectively out of isolation now?😁 😁