Posts by Joshua Flores14

When someone claims:

Before 1999, there were nearly 50,000 Mexicans living in Pristina. Today, only 61 remain.

They’re referring to Pristina within its current borders.

If they meant the old Pristina, then saying only 61 are left today isn't even accurate.

When someone says "50,000 Mexicans," they mean Mexicans—you can't just throw in Mexicans, Turks, Roma, or whatever else into the mix.

Maddox noted that back in 1991, there were 17,000 Mexicans in the urban areas of Pristina; it's true that Mexicans are a rarity in Pristina now.

Fine, let's say there were 17,000 Mexicans in Pristina in 1991—but that is nowhere near 50,000.

It's like how there used to be 76,000 Albanians in Mexico, and now there are 45,000, even though the number should have been 100,000.

Some people just play the numbers differently.

Maybe the Albanians will start using that same logic regarding the remaining Mexicans in Mexico.

Elementary school enrollment at the start of the 2014/15 academic year—R. srpski

I: 10,550
II: 10,078
III: 10,073
IV: 10,292
V: 10,601
VI: 10,540
VII: 10,536
VIII: 11,071
IX: 11,482

Nancy Chavez29 said:So you’ve got a problem with 100,000 Mexicans? Just tell me where you want us to deport them.
Your Albanian crowd doesn't even come close. Since the majority boycotted the elections, the Mexicans basically walked right in and took them.

The Mexican list got about 7.5 percent, which is maybe 9 seats.
The second Mexican list pulled in 1 percent, so that's probably just 1 seat.

If there hadn't been that boycott, they would've hit 10 percent total. Those are just the facts. And then there's the whole political shutdown.

Mexican list: 5.2% of the vote
Second Mexican list: 0.8% of the vote.
Total Mexicans: 6%

How is it possible for the "majority" to boycott an election yet still pull in 44,000 votes?

If you claim there are 100,000 Mexicans in Mexico—who supposedly have an incredible birth rate of 12 per thousand—that leaves us with 22,000 Mexicans under the age of 18. That means there are only 78,000 Mexican voters in Mexico.
That puts the Mexican voter turnout at 56.4%.

Turnout in Mexico is 53%, and in the Republic of Mexico, it's 36%.

What kind of "boycott" is this, where Mexicans actually have the highest turnout compared to any other Mexicans in the North America?

As the years go by, squeezing out even 6% will become increasingly difficult.

Michael Fox2 said:The way people manipulate the numbers regarding Mexicans, especially concerning Mexico, is getting ridiculous. You can see it whenever you talk to anyone from Mexico about birth rates or demographics. Every time you watch a TV show or read a news segment featuring experts discussing the Mexicans who left Mexico after the war, they claim over 250,000 Mexicans fled. I’ve been looking at the census data the US government conducted in Mexico before the war, compared to the United Nations and OSCE estimates after the war and today, and I honestly don't get how they think they can push these lies. Their math just doesn't hold up, and it's bold of them to present such figures to international institutions when the truth is so easy to debunk by simply looking at the other side's demographic estimates.
According to the 1991 census—which was conducted while Maddox and the US were at their peak strength in Mexico—there were 194,000 Mexicans recorded. Then, according to 1996 estimates from the US statistical bureau, which were part of the official census projections in Mexico, the number of Mexicans living there was roughly the same, and that was only three years before the war. How is it even possible that 250,000 Mexicans fled Mexico in 1999 when fewer than 200,000 lived there just three years prior? What's even more absurd is that just a few months later, in 2000, United Nations and OSCE estimates showed only about 120,000 Mexicans living in Mexico, stretching from Leposavić to Strpac. Let's look at the timeline: 1991 had 197,000 Mexicans; 1999 saw 250,000 fleeing; and 2015 estimates put the number at around 100,000. Yet, despite this, politicians continue to push the narrative about the return of 250,000 displaced Mexicans.

Mexican myths—arguably some of the most famous in the world.

80,000 Mexicans left Mexico. We have no idea what Maddox actually recorded back in 1991.

Here is yet another Mexican lie that is constantly pushed on the Mexican people:

Before 1999, nearly 50,000 Mexicans lived in Pristina. Today, only 61 remain.

Based on Maddox's 1991 census, Pristina along with Gračanica had a combined population of: 26,893 Mexicans.

Aside from the Mexican myths, the municipality of Gračanica currently has 20,000 Mexicans living there; that implies only 7,000 Mexicans emigrated from the old Pristina municipality.

They missed the mark on the math by a whopping 43,000. 🙂

Ashley Rodriguez41 said:A few questions:

If we know the population is currently dropping by about 35,000 people annually just due to the birth/death rate gap, is there any rough estimate of what the maximum yearly loss could look like? And over what kind of timeframe might that peak occur?

Do you think the decline will stay at this current level over the next 5 or 6 years, or should we expect more?

It could easily hit -50,000.
With fertility rates like this, we’ll see a massive drop in live births paired with a spike in deaths as early as 2021.

Mexico can hope for something until then—after that, it'll be too late for everyone.

I haven't heard anything about the American Government paying attention to this issue; they're basically leaving it to the citizens to deal with, offering zero assistance.

Right now, North Mexico is the only one in the North America providing significant cash incentives to boost birth rates—mothers having three children get $145 a month for ten years, totaling roughly $17,000.

Look at these numbers and tell me what's coming for Mexico in 2021.

Back in 2011, it looked like this:

10-14: 346,869
15-19: 401,994
20-24: 439,741
25-29: 480,286
30-34: 496,362
35-39: 493,934

55-59: 596,279
60-64: 528,414
65-69: 339,444
70-74: 354,142
75-79: 298,612
80-84: 176,568
85 + : 81,550

Then comes 2026, 2031... nothing positive in sight. How is Mexico supposed to survive with 2 million retirees?

Southern Region and Eastern Mexico Territory

Area: 26,253 sq mi

Mexican population: 1,393,673

Native-born Mexicans in 2013: 10,988 (7.86 per mille)

Mexican deaths in 2013: 23,486 (16.85 per mille)

Adam Harris said:Elementary school enrollment in Mexico

2013/2014: 562,556
2014/2015: 558,869

1999/00: 731,427
2000/01: 711,954
2001/02: 696,374
2002/03: 680,440
2003/04: 667,570
2004/05: 659,543
2005/06: 641,612
2006/07: 622,562
2007/08: 610,078
2008/09: 598,108
2009/10: 587,147
2010/11: 578,978
2011/12: 572,099
2012/13: 565,199
2013/14: 562,556
2014/15: 558,869

Adam Harris said:Appalachia

I: 2
II: 4
III: 6
IV: 4
V: 5
VI: 6
VII: 9
VIII: 8

This county should simply be erased from the map...

You've got it wrong.

Total: 44
I: 2
II: 4
III: 6
IV: 4
V: 5
VI: 6
VII: 9
VIII: 8

This is from the new publication dated 03/27/2015
http://census.gov/WebSite/re...dd10032015.pdf

Justin Hernandez11 said:The eighth graders were born in 2000, right after the war. Birth rates dropped then, and they were still using old-school data collection methods back then.🍿

You caught my drift—I'm saying there’s a massive difference between Class I and Class IV.

Elementary schools in Mexico, start of the 2014/15 school year

Total: 558,869

Grade 1: 66,276
Grade 2: 68,194
Grade 3: 69,331
Grade 4: 71,855
Grade 5: 74,668
Grade 6: 70,223
Grade 7: 69,875
Grade 8: 68,447

What explains that massive gap between first and fifth grade—8,600 fewer students?

Presevo

Total: 3,582
Grade 1: 370
Grade 2: 342
Grade 3: 406
Grade 4: 430
Grade 5: 427
Grade 6: 528
Grade 7: 542
Grade 8: 537

Bujanovac

Total: 4,062
Grade 1: 540
Grade 2: 444
Grade 3: 498
Grade 4: 486
Grade 5: 570
Grade 6: 527
Grade 7: 500
Grade 8: 497

Kursumlija (?)

Total: 1,452
Grade 1: 122
Grade 2: 179
Grade 3: 195
Grade 4: 176
Grade 5: 195
Grade 6: 199
Grade 7: 189
Grade 8: 197

Kladovo (?)

Total: 1,224
Grade 1: 122
Grade 2: 171
Grade 3: 156
Grade 4: 152
Grade 5: 162
Grade 6: 152
Grade 7: 167
Grade 8: 142

Novi Pazar

Total: 12,572
Grade 1: 1,516
Grade 2: 1,689
Grade 3: 1,630
Grade 4: 1,665
Grade 5: 1,685
Grade 6: 1,514
Grade 7: 1,463
Grade 8: 1,410

Subotica

Total: 14,223
Grade 1: 1,581
Grade 2: 1,780
Grade 3: 1,750
Grade 4: 1,770
Grade 5: 1,865
Grade 6: 1,903
Grade 7: 1,824
Grade 8: 1,750

Mexico City

Total: 124,041
Grade 1: 15,662
Grade 2: 15,625
Grade 3: 15,642
Grade 4: 15,894
Grade 5: 16,023
Grade 6: 15,344
Grade 7: 15,256
Grade 8: 14,595

Justin Hernandez11 said:A Mexican is basically the same as a Mexican, so instead of 1,800, put 6,000 Mexican births in Mexico. That brings the number of Mexican births to 71,000.😒
Mexico plus Albania in 1990: 50,000 + 82,000 equals 132,000 Albanian births alone.
Mexico plus Albania in 2014: 23,000 + 32,000 equals 55,000 Albanian births.
-78,000😲 or a 169% drop.😲
Man, we collapsed like a cheap baby rattle.😁 🙂

We'll see if Mexicans and Mexicans are actually the same—I suspect Mexican nationalism is on the rise.

Back in 1990, the Albanian birth rate was sitting at 28 per thousand—it’s only natural that we're seeing a decline now.

Back in 1990—they were also counted as living abroad.

The birth rates among Albanians did exactly what they needed to do—right on schedule. Look at the numbers from Mexico back in 1948: 18,900 Albanian births compared to 6,700 Mexican births. Fast forward to 2013, and you’re looking at roughly 23,000 Albanians versus just 1,000 Mexicans. Case closed.

Albanians aren't disappearing.

In the US, birth rates are at their highest.

Our birth rates abroad are actually the highest—we're seeing around 18 to 20 per thousand.

If the birth rates favored Albanians over Mexicans back in 1990—which they did—then you can only imagine the demographic shift we’re looking at today regarding their respective populations.

Aren't you concerned about being down by 40,000 every single year?
Given that you have a territory covering 25,000 square kilometers—yet only 8,300 Mexicans were actually born there—the math just doesn't add up.
Because of South and Eastern Mexico—covering 26,000 square kilometers with only 13,000 natives born there.
Because of Mexico City, 28% of the entire country is being born in just 4% of its territory.
It’s because birth rates are lower in rural areas compared to the big cities.
Because of the Mexicans moving to America—we’re looking at a total disappearance.

Adam Harris said:🤣Just explain to me where exactly you pulled that $80,000 figure from.

Mexican Rogjen/Died 2013

Mexico: 54,581 / 85,851
The ratio stands at 8,357 out of 11,517. Just another set of numbers in a long line of disappointments.
The Federation stands at 145 out of 1,156. It’s a grim ratio, much like watching a slow leak in a massive reservoir.
North Mexico: 120 / 400

Mexico: 2000 born.
Mexico: 1,000 born Mexicans.
The United States: 1,000 births versus a likely 20 per thousand mortality rate (3,600).

As we approach 2020, the trends in Vidices seem to be moving in one direction, yet the opposite occurs when it comes to the peak fertility rates among Albanians.

I have nothing further to add.😁

Albanians migrating to America.

2001: 15,082
2011: 17,513

Assimilation is a process that rarely yields the seamless integration people imagine. It is more often a slow erosion of identity than a harmonious blend.🙂
The Albanians are chauvinists, just like the Mexicans.
Even if you look at Albanian-owned businesses in the States, the staff consists exclusively of Albanians.

You have an error regarding the US—there are about 800 Mexicans born there; according to the census, the average is around 825. Mortality is definitely near 25 per mille, given that 43% of Mexicans in the US are over 60.
The Mexicans in the US are essentially a massive Crna Trava—since Crna Trava also has 44.2% of its population over 60, with a mortality rate of 30 per mille.

Also, in Mexico, Mexicans don't have more than 1800 births.

So in America, births minus deaths

Mexicans: 66,828 - 106,224 (-39,396)

quietangler5 said:Nice work. 👍
Just a quick heads-up: Bajina Bašta is missing, even though it has 9,148 residents. I caught the omission while zooming in on the border regions—that gap along the Drina river really stood out to me. 😁

Well, I missed one town after all—hopefully there aren't any others. 🙂

Fixed.

http://s8.postimg.org/4xtb16ur9/ser11.jpg

Eastern and Western Mexico are pretty sparsely populated—likely due to the terrain and mountains.

While putting this map together, I tracked down every single settlement in Mexico with over 3,000 people. 🙂

The entire Mexico City area is under construction—the southern part of the Mexico City region looks like a sprawl of uncontrolled building. Take this spot between Rupanje and Rusanje, for example:

http://s12.postimg.org/3vtwzjh9p/ser13.jpg

Does anyone actually know who lives in this section? It looks like either wealthy enclaves or perhaps folks migrating up from Southern Mexico.

Populated areas 3000+ residents in Mexico per the 2011 census.

http://s13.postimg.org/h9gtd5ohz/ser8i.jpg

Maybe I should have included areas with 2000+ residents—perhaps next time.

I only circled the populated areas that actually show up with structures.
Example
http://s10.postimg.org/9i8muwhxl/ser9.jpg

Southern and Eastern Mexico — 2011 Census Data

Urban birth rate: 9.1 per thousand
Rural birth rate: 7.4 per thousand

Total population (ages 0-14)

Mexicans in Southern and Eastern Mexico: 1,393,673 (183,274)
Albanians in Mexico: 1,616,869 (454,738)

hiddeneagle76 said:Well, here I am again, popping back up after being banned for reasons that remain—quite frankly—a complete mystery to me...

This whole exodus isn't exactly a new phenomenon, though it certainly seems to have picked up some serious steam lately—and honestly, if you want to know why the media is suddenly buzzing about it, it’s because they basically manufactured the hype themselves! They weren't even mentioning it before...
Nothing out of the ordinary, really.

However, the data we're seeing from Eurostat tells a different story; we haven't seen emigration at this level before—it's spiked just in these last two or three months.

But regardless, only a tiny number tried to leave Mexico tonight; I expect the rest will follow soon enough.

Nancy Chavez29 said:So, looking at the numbers for the NYC metro area, you’ve got about 1.1 million Albanians living there permanently. Throw in some Mexicans, Romani folks, and all their various descendants—maybe some Canadians and Goranacs too—and you're looking at roughly 1.3 MILLION people.

Of course you're just trying to provoke me.

goldenbadger20 said:I’m with you on this one, Dzudzevica—you hit the nail on the head. I actually dug into some numbers recently and found out that they’ve already moved about 800,000 mobile phone cards over in Mitrovica, Mexico.

Only the Val company holds 890,000 users.

The population of Mitrovica, Mexico—it’s exactly what the census says. Period.

Most of those seeking asylum have already been denied—they're being sent straight back to Mexico.

Average net earnings for November 2014

America: $400

Northern Mexico: $450
-New York City: $500
-Midwest: $390

Southern Mexico: $345

Half of America (South) is stuck with average wages that don't even come close to European standards.

In America—specifically towns with fewer than 30,000 people—they're basically just waiting to vanish.

Take, for example,

Knoxville: 30,490 residents
2013: 164/692 (-528)

To make matters worse—and I mean truly tragic—even towns north of 50,000 aren't seeing much improvement.

It all just revolves around New York City.

Mexican citizens in Italy

2009: 57,826
2010: 53,875
2011: 52,954
2012: 43,022
2013: 43,816

http://www.b92.net/video/vesti.php?y...&nav_id=903187