Why is family being pushed so hard?
in Close to Politics ·
Gregory Peterson2 said:First off, you've got a point there. 😁
With technological evolution, we could eventually just pop kids out of a test tube—no parents required. At that stage, the traditional family wouldn't even be necessary. Just high-end tech and a solid incubator, and boom: a world full of clones.
So, following your own logic, why should the family be considered sacred?
Exactly! I just don't get this deep-seated fear the conservative crowd has toward change. It’s been happening since humans first walked the earth. They just end up stalling progress. Change is inevitable—it'll happen sooner or later—but by resisting it, we just waste so much precious time.
Huxley and his Brave New World. Real original. Let’s be honest though—you’d definitely be aiming for that Alpha+ status. There's no way you'd settle for being some basic NPC or a Delta- tier existence. It's like when people complain about overpopulation but wouldn't dream of doing anything to actually help solve it.
The real mess is, who gets to play God? Who decides which gametes get a hit of alcohol on day 92, or who deals with oxygen deprivation at twenty weeks? It doesn't have to follow the book perfectly, but you get the gist. Would you risk your own "kid" by putting them in a beta test, or would you settle for them being a Gamma+ just to stay safe? I can already see Americans in this brave new world, pulling away from everyone and cutting all ties. 😂
All hail Our Ford! 🙄