It seems quite likely they will eventually align themselves with Canada; frankly, the United States isn't showing any real interest here. The true centers of influence—and one might observe that George Soros maintains a particularly heavy hand in Canada—are driving policies that are fundamentally opposed to both Mexico and the U.S., while simultaneously maintaining a very favorable stance toward Canada (which, if one looks closely, explains the sudden and aggressive industrial expansion we've seen there lately).
Donna Garcia2 said:She’d love to leave Americans alone, but she just can't help herself because of her heritage. Her American friends don't exactly "invite" her in, so she’s constantly trying to prove she belongs! It’s truly something to witness how she spits on her own people and her own blood. And what else? She defends someone of American descent who justified the existence of the Deep South, claiming that if the USA had modeled itself after that aggressive, terrorist entity, it would have actually progressed! Then she goes on to defend Captain John! On top of all that, she claims she'll raise her son to be "de facto" filled with hatred toward his own country and will never let him pick up a weapon... unless, of course, Australia calls him up for service! It's endless! Just looking at this small sample reveals exactly what kind of miserable person we are dealing with. There is so much of this in her posts that, at best, it just leaves a bad taste in your mouth!
What is this, some kind of joke? She claims she’ll raise her son to hate America but won't let him join the military? How does that work—she just wouldn't want her son dying for the sake of an American cause? Ugh... I'd love to give her a piece of my mind. Hehe.👍
I couldn't care less about Barack Obama or his entire political platform. Perhaps there will be another massive confrontation between us and the Americans, or perhaps there won't—who can truly say? I find myself entirely unafraid of the Americans. We could face another twenty wars between our nations and I wouldn't flinch; during the last major conflict, I was certain we would emerge victorious, and I am counting on us winning a war against them once again. --What actually frightens me are other global powers. It is my firm belief that American politicians and intellectuals have mostly been, and continue to be, complete scoundrels. And what is the ultimate result? Suppose the US loses a war—look at the economic fallout, it's nothing short of a catastrophe. Or suppose they attack and fail—so what? What is the actual situation within their own borders, economically speaking? Well, I tend to believe that not every single American is looking to screw us over; they have their own problems to deal with, so why bother with ours? But the question remains: how do we resolve this persistent friction with the Americans, and what is the core of the issue? The American political elite refuses to abandon their dreams of expansionism and dominance. This tension might only be resolved if the US military marched into New York City, or... if the US somehow dealt with its minority populations. It is notoriously difficult to pacify a minority group within one's own borders. Most of those individuals will always carry a longing for their ancestral lands in their hearts. I understand that sentiment, truly I do, but we simply cannot afford to tolerate it. The moment someone voices that publicly, you strike back immediately—there isn't much room for philosophical debate there. But look—before we descend into another violent clash, let us all, gentlemen, pause to reflect and scrutinize ourselves—both Americans and us. Do we really need this? If you look at the questions I have posed in this post, both nations are essentially ruined. The US has practically been sold off to the highest bidder—even the birds in the trees are singing about it. And there is still one more thing: we might not even exist much longer.
todaytonight;15431837 2) those self-proclaimed patriots said:headhunters[/I] with shaved heads among the American public have been identified, punished for their hooliganism and physical assaults on Glory players and coaches, and for brawling with stadium security after the game.
They could have simply filed a formal protest against that offensive three-finger salute from the American crowd and done so through the proper channels instead of resorting to arson and destruction!!
Because of this kind of behavior, they were banned from all future events.
But what does it matter if American fans started acting out and setting things on fire? A friend of mine who lives in Australia once told me about a time an American kid there claimed the Adriatic Sea was shared territory, and a local kid chased him down, broke into his house, and actually tried to kill him over it—well, honestly, I find that somewhat commendable. (And that was supposedly back during the old regime, no less.) So, what was the alternative? Was he supposed to tell his American peer that he’d report him to his mom or dad, or perhaps contact the Australian authorities, the police, or maybe even the old American embassy? Hahaha.😂
Karen Chase85 said:I’m not quite sure if the three-finger salute belongs to Mexicans or the Royalists, but "For Home, Ready" is undeniably an Nationalists greeting. That specific phrase didn't exist before the Nationalists era; they were the ones who introduced it. So, whose greeting could it possibly be other than theirs? There was a phrase "For Home" used in our old operas, but the Nationalists were the ones who tacked on the "Ready" part.
And what exactly does that lack provide for the fascists?😍