The way you communicate just feels disrespectful. Honestly, I don't do that kind of talk. I have nothing left to add since I've already laid out all the facts, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion—including you, dear.
silverbison293 said:Look, if you actually want to be taken seriously, you need to provide a link to back up that claim—get it? 😉
Maybe you didn't read all my posts carefully enough. I mentioned in one of them that you can verify this data directly with the IRS, and in another, I even noted exactly where I received my own instructions.
Sure, you can just call them! And since you seem so tech-savvy, I'm sure you're resourceful enough to find their phone numbers on your own. 😉
Beyond what you already mentioned, they were asking me for an additional three to five standardized forms based on specific locations. I actually asked them, "Wait, why do I need different paperwork for every single site?" and they just told me that every local administration sets its own rules. To make matters worse, they wouldn't even look at my documents without a formal lease agreement in place. They are obsessed with hitting the landlord with income tax if it’s an individual. Even if you claim the lease is for zero dollars, they’ll just calculate the tax based on whatever the standard market rate is for that specific area. You can verify that yourself with the Trešnjevka Police Department, Susedgrad, or Samobor.
I didn't get an answer from you—when and at which Police Department did you submit your founding documents?
mellowfox56 said:Nah, I didn't say anything to the inspector because there wasn't even a reason to. The invoices were signed by the person who actually had the authority to do so. I feel like we've already made it clear who’s authorized to sign documents, so there's no need to get defensive about it. We're just here to talk about how things actually work on the ground and what the day-to-day reality looks like. It's totally possible for an inspector to trip up and try to penalize you for something that wouldn't even cross our minds.
I agree—we are here to talk about practical reality. I was just using an example from my own experience. This isn't a question of whether something is possible for practical reasons. Sure, you could let a six-year-old pick cotton in a field, but is it legal? That's the point. I pointed out what is legally justified and what isn't.
And again, you have to distinguish between issuing and signing. If you AREN'T AN EMPLOYEE but are just helping out, you cannot ISSUE a receipt. That means you can't take the money, put it in the register, and issue a receipt for that amount—regardless of whether it's hand-signed or an electronic receipt marked as valid without a stamp or signature.
mellowfox56 said:Man, please don't confuse people with technicalities that don't even matter anymore. They totally can process a transaction because everything is digital now; you don't even need a physical signature since there's always a disclaimer saying "valid without signature." And look, if it really comes down to it and someone needs a handwritten receipt, the owner just signs it. Or, if we're talking about official stuff, someone can just list a family member as an authorized signer at their bank. I mean, what would stop the owner's son from working there? You see kids taking over shifts for their parents in retail stores all the time, doing the exact same job as anyone else. Same goes for a spouse, too.
Did you tell the inspector conducting the audit at your company not to confuse you with trivialities? And did you get away with it? If so, props to you!
And let's be clear: signing a document and issuing a receipt are two different things.
Instead of treating it like a loan, can I just pull the cash for the business account and record it as petty cash? That way, I could pay all my small cash expenses directly from the register.
You can withdraw it under material expenses, as long as you back everything up with receipts.
So, look—if this had been a mail carrier instead of a grandma with a kid, I’m pretty sure the owner would be on the hook if there wasn't a "Beware of Dog" sign posted. But since the story says the woman walked right up to the dog and saw him, there was no element of surprise. We all know what feels fair, but is it actually legal? That's the real question. As for the dog itself? He was just acting on instinct based on his situation. A dog isn't responsible for its actions; the owner is. And honestly, should it matter if it's a Rocky or a Pinch? That feels like pure discrimination. Every owner needs to socialize their pet, train them, and understand their temperament to protect both the animal and the public. Personally, I wouldn't mind if someone kept a rhino, as long as that thing wasn't a threat to my safety.
People get scared of dogs all the time and think they have a right to demand dogs don't exist just because they're afraid. Usually, that fear comes from how they were raised or a bad experience they had as a kid that never got properly worked through—like getting nipped by a pup when they were little. If you asked someone if they'd be afraid to cross the street because a car hit them when they were a toddler, would they suggest we ban cars from the road? Huh...
silverbison293 said:Listen, Nicholas Gomez5, 😉, I run my own business, and honestly, I’ve never once dealt with a formal Lease Contract for a registered headquarters—nor have I ever run into any issues with the FBI, whether it was for my own outfit or for other companies I helped get off the ground.
That’s exactly why I asked you for the link... I’m not interested in getting boggedED up in "he said, she said" nonsense—you either need a Contract or you don't.
What actually matters is having a valid service address where the company name is clearly displayed.
😍
I’m not sure when you started your business, but I think the new laws kicked in this year. I’ve opened several companies recently around Chicago and the surrounding areas, dealing with various tax offices, and everywhere I went, they required a Lease Contract.
silverbison293 said:That first point isn't quite right... and if I'm wrong, please, by all means, drop a link proving otherwise—because you don't actually need a formal lease agreement for your headquarters just to incorporate a company.☕
A lease is required for the premises where the company is registered, unless there's another location being used for operations that already has its own signed lease.
You can double-check that with the IRS.
Let me fix that inaccuracy: You're right, you don't need it just to open up. But you definitely need one when filing with the FBI during your business commencement notification.
Henry Edwards33 said:Yeah, I was referring to income tax. I used the word "profit" just to make it easier to follow, since that’s how people usually talk about it when dealing with small businesses and filing their returns. Of course, there are exceptions for those high-earning outliers, but you generally have to hit certain milestones in revenue, headcount, and total asset value before you even get close to that level.
I agree! I used those same taxation criteria for my comparison, so both terms work perfectly fine here. Thanks!
mellowfox56 said:From what I understand, family members can work for a sole proprietorship without being officially on the payroll, but that’s not an option with an LLC. If I’ve got that wrong, please set me straight. You’d probably have better luck Googling "sole proprietorship vs LLC" or searching business forums for threads about the pros and cons of each structure. Maybe try asking something more specific? Like, if you're looking at starting a business with zero employees, for example. It's hard to give good advice when the question is this vague.
Family members can't actually "work" there if they aren't employees. They can HELP out, sure, but they can't take over a role. For example, they can help you stock shelves, but they aren't allowed to ring up a sale or issue a receipt.
Henry Edwards33 said:Actually, profit for a sole proprietor follows progressive tax brackets, whereas an LLC stays at a flat 21% corporate rate. Sales tax works differently too—sole proprietors deal with it based on what’s actually collected, while an LLC tracks it based on invoices issued. As for self-employment taxes for a sole owner who isn't working elsewhere, if you follow the Police Department order, you're looking at roughly $577 this year.
And just a heads-up: if you pull your initial capital from a loan rather than equity, you'll be hit with interest.
Could you clarify what you mean by "profit in a sole proprietorship goes by progressive rates"? Can you give me an example, or are you talking about income tax?
copperharbor4 said:Question: A guy I know is setting up an LLC and wants to sign a lease with me for a portion of our apartment (which is in my name). How does this contract factor into my tax return? Am I required to report this as secondary income, or what's the deal?
Once you sign that contract, you take it straight to the IRS. Based on that, they’ll issue a notice telling you exactly how much tax you owe. Of course, the final amount depends entirely on the specific terms laid out in the agreement...
Robert Chavez92 said:Can I pull out the initial capital (20k) right after setting up an LLC? And is just writing "initial capital withdrawal" enough when I'm making the transfer from the account?
You won't actually have the full amount sitting there ready to go. The bank is going to snatch their service fees right away—and those fees change depending on whether you signed up for extras like online banking. You really need to leave some cushion in there so the bank can cover its monthly service charges. Let's say you could actually pull out about $6.50.
That's basically treated like a loan that gets hit with sales tax.
Sorry if this sounds like a total newbie question, but I’m honestly pretty clueless about how all this works. If I set myself up as a small business here in the States, am I allowed to receive money from overseas? Specifically, I'm looking at the Google Play Store and Apple—I want to sell my apps through my own company structure.🙂
As a sole proprietor, you aren't technically a "corporation"—you're just a person doing business.
Buyer or seller—we’ve all played both sides at some point, haven't we? So let's not be so quick to judge. You aren't just a "customer" or a "vendor"; you're a human being with dignity, and so is the person on the other side. Let’s start by respecting that!
It’s vital to remember that EVERYONE IS LOOKING OUT FOR THEMSELVES. Don't take someone else's negativity personally. Usually, those outbursts are just a projection of their own internal frustrations...
In this scenario, the actual product doesn't even matter. If it wasn't bread, it would have been a jar of pickles... They just targeted the clerk as a way to vent their own inner rage...
As a seller, you have a choice: you can soak up that frustration and get dragged into their drama, or you can simply lay out the available options (like a refund, an exchange, a formal complaint form, a manager's direct line, etc.). And if things cross the line into personal insults or become physically aggressive? That's when you call for a manager or dial 911.
So, I’m looking into starting my own business—I get the whole deal with the startup capital and picking a name and all that... but here's what's actually on my mind. Can the company just run normally while I'm simultaneously finishing up my dental residency at the Mayo Clinic? Like, they're paying me for the residency, right? I'd be the director of my company, but I wouldn't technically be an "employee" of it since, well, Medicare is basically footing my bill through the Mayo Clinic. If I go that route, would I be required to hire someone else to actually staff the place?