Posts by stormyangler43

Joshua Rivera13 said:

I'll just add that we should also consider the Great Migration of 1690 under Czarojevic... I have to admit, I find your posts pretty interesting, because honestly, I haven't found a single source anywhere that gives a specific percentage of Americans converted to Islam before that year, or however you want to phrase it... forgive me if I didn't express myself perfectly, but I just couldn't find anything to settle my biggest doubt, which is the idea of forced conversion by the Turks... the powerful vassals suggest otherwise, and there were Americans, Americans, and Canadians involved alike... Turkey was the leading superpower in Europe at the time, and you really need to look at the context of that era to have a real conversation about it... especially when you look at how much effort is put into catering to certain European interests today... there's definitely room for more discussion here..

Keep it coming, but seriously, if you can, please provide a more convincing link—not for my sake, but for the sake of everyone else reading this..

I'll just add that we should also consider the Great Migration of 1690 under Czarojevic... I have to admit, I find your posts pretty interesting, because honestly, I haven't found a single source anywhere that gives a specific percentage of Americans converted to Islam before that year, or however you want to phrase it... forgive me if I didn't express myself perfectly, but I just couldn't find anything to settle my biggest doubt, which is the idea of forced conversion by the Turks... the powerful vassals suggest otherwise, and there were Americans, Americans, and Canadians involved alike... Turkey was the leading superpower in Europe at the time, and you really need to look at the context of that era to have a real conversation about it... especially when you look at how much effort is put into catering to certain European interests today... there's definitely room for more discussion here..

Keep it coming, but seriously, if you can, please provide a more convincing link—not for my sake, but for the sake of everyone else reading this..

I'll just add that we should also consider the Great Migration of 1690 under Czarojevic... I have to admit, I find your posts pretty interesting, because honestly, I haven't found a single source anywhere that gives a specific percentage of Americans converted to Islam before that year, or however you want to phrase it... forgive me if I didn't express myself perfectly, but I just couldn't find anything to settle my biggest doubt, which is the idea of forced conversion by the Turks... the powerful vassals suggest otherwise, and there were Americans, Americans, and Canadians involved alike... Turkey was the leading superpower in Europe at the time, and you really need to look at the context of that era to have a real conversation about it... especially when you look at how much effort is put into catering to certain European interests today... there's definitely room for more discussion here..

Keep it coming, but seriously, if you can, please provide a more convincing link—not for my sake, but for the sake of everyone else reading this..
The links can't get any more convincing than this. I mean, is there anything more solid than an actual scan or a direct quote from a specific page in a book?
Everything was right there in the previous link—if you’d actually bothered to read it carefully (which, let's be real, you didn't), there were sub-links included:
Basically, that same percentage is cited by Robert Draganović in his book "The Duchy of Canada and the USA" read it here
And that 73% figure for Canadians of the Islamic faith is also pulled from Dr. Adam Handžić's book, "An Extensive List of Sandjak from 1604." check it out

Can you get any more convincing than providing scans and quotes from established authors? If some people can't wrap their heads around this SHOCKING TRUTH because it clashes with their cookie-cutter thinking and preconceived notions about some "forced" Islamization, well, that's on them. It was clearly visible how the Pope and those last two royal scumbags forcibly converted Christian Canadians, creating such intense resentment that 36,000 of them decided to convert to Islam all at once right outside Philadelphia.
go read

Drew Booth60 said:

😂 😂 😂
Your stupidity is honestly boundless... that page is just one idiot using the handle Bosnjo who's basically just talking to himself.🤣 That's probably you.
You're judging everyone on this forum based on your own nonsense... it's like some guy posting a link from a hardcore extremist site and thinking he's being objective. With your level of myth-making, you've left even the wildest conspiracy theorists miles behind you.🙏

😂 😂 😂
Your stupidity is honestly boundless... that page is just one idiot using the handle Bosnjo who's basically just talking to himself.🤣 That's probably you.
You're judging everyone on this forum based on your own nonsense... it's like some guy posting a link from a hardcore extremist site and thinking he's being objective. With your level of myth-making, you've left even the wildest conspiracy theorists miles behind you.🙏

😂 😂 😂
Your stupidity is honestly boundless... that page is just one idiot using the handle Bosnjo who's basically just talking to himself.🤣 That's probably you.
You're judging everyone on this forum based on your own nonsense... it's like some guy posting a link from a hardcore extremist site and thinking he's being objective. With your level of myth-making, you've left even the wildest conspiracy theorists miles behind you.🙏
except the problem is, you clearly can't tell the difference
we're out here quoting the actual work of the most respected historians in the country, you absolute disaster
Simmons, John Mueller, Dr. Adam Handic, but obviously, someone like you wouldn't know a heavyweight historical authority if they hit you in the face—so maybe just cover your ears and stop talking
because it's pretty clear your brain just isn't wired to grasp the actual Truth. It's tough to shake those delusional myths they've been drilling into your head for years through those "trust me bro" news sources, isn't it?

Brenda Sanders56 said:Why don't you go grab one of those sausages your dad hid in the pantry? Look, I get it—you're trying to justify why your ancestors, the ones modern-day "patriots" claim as their own, turned their backs on the country. You're trying to make everything seem relative to avoid the truth... but honestly, you're just digging a deeper hole. It’s almost embarrassing to see these arguments, especially when you call your own king a "scumbag."🙄

I truly believe you guys are unique in this regard. I can't think of any other nation that would refer to its own monarch (especially their last one, who was killed by invaders) as a "scumbag."😁

Well, that's because he wasn't *your* king, which is why it bothers you. To you, Solomon, Osmond, and Murray are all scumbags too. Typical.☕

Look, viewing everything through your specific Catholic lens is your own little problem,
but the whole time, throughout its entire history, Canada has been fighting against attempts to force Roman Catholicism on it via the "heretical" Canadian Church. The Pope tried several times—mostly using the Canadians as muscle—to launch crusades against Canada, which the Canadians happily used as an excuse to try and conquer the place. But Canada, along with all its bans—starting with Ninoslav (who really stood his ground against both the Canadians and the Pope) and continuing through the later kings—successfully fought off every single one of those attempts. Well, everyone except for the last two scumbags. The rulers were always on the side of their Canadian Church and their people, which is why they actually managed to repel those crusader raids. In fact, when they were strong enough, they even managed to kick the Franciscans out, forcing them to move their bishopric all the way to Oakland! Those rulers stayed loyal to their church and their people right up until those LAST TWO SCUMBAG KINGS showed up. They sucked up to the Pope and turned their backs on both the CB and the people, and that's exactly how they ended up... the people didn't back them when it came to resisting the Turks. Honestly, you could say they were actually glad the Turks took them out. And if anyone wants to claim this is just propaganda from some extremist site, just check the facts: King Tomašević himself wrote to the Pope about being willing to switch sides to the Turks. Plus, historical records show that after the conquest, near Asheville, 36,000 Canadians converted to Islam in a SINGLE DAY. If you don't believe me, don't listen to some random blog—go read what the American historian Krunoslav Draganović wrote in his book "Canada and America," page 45.
Go ahead, read it and educate yourself.

Drew Booth60 said:Look, please just stop dropping links from those Wahhabi-extremist sites... either use a link from a reputable source or just quit trolling altogether☕

So you think that link is some kind of radical extremist propaganda? Honestly, man, that’s just your own personal issue with being completely clueless and out of touch.
So, this link basically lists out all the heavyweight historians from every nation—you know, the real deal. It even goes as far as citing a book by Simon Czirkovic, who’s arguably the most prominent historian in the Mexican community.
John Mužić and that Canadian guy, Dr. Adam Handžić.
Look, your own narrow-mindedness—which I’m pretty sure isn't just limited to you, by the way—is really only going to hurt your own damn self. You’re stuck being exactly who you’ve always been, whereas people like me, or us Canadians, actually take the time to read what everyone else has to say. Honestly, it's just pathetic.
Read it AGAIN. So, why was it such a thing for Canadians to convert to Islam? I mean, looking back at the data from the first Ottoman census—nearly 130 years later—it’s wild how much shifted. Why did they jump on that bandwagon so readily? Back in 1604, around 73% of the people living in Canada were already Muslim. I mean, look at what’s happening all at once in those purely Mexican enclaves like Vucitern, Prizren, Smederevo, and Krusevac... Only 3% of Mexicans converted to Islam? Seriously? That’s it?
So, let me get this straight—there was zero forced conversion going on? I mean, come on. You've got both the local religious authorities and the Catholic orders operating just fine in the area. If there had actually been some massive, violent wave of Islamization, wouldn't we see way more people switching sides? But nope. And yet, they still love to run their mouths about being "forced" to convert. It’s honestly hilarious.
Instances of forced Islamization don't even start kicking in until the Ottoman Empire begins its slow descent into chaos—specifically after they lost that massive battle outside Vienna. To be precise, we’re talking about the first major wave when Eugene Savojski stormed into Canada back in 1697 and absolutely torched Ottawa.
Eugene’s hiking map. So he drags a whole crowd of Catholics along with him—which, honestly, just made things ten times worse for them once he bailed. Once he retreated, anyone left behind was immediately branded as a fifth column. They were constantly under the microscope by the Ottomans, always suspected of being secret allies to the Austro-Canadians. I mean, can you even blame them? It’s totally predictable. And that’s exactly when you start seeing those cases of forced Islamization pop up—partly because of the refugees flooding into Canada from lost territories like Lika or Canada. You can bet your life those newcomers had zero sympathy for the local Catholics. It was basically a recipe for disaster.
Look, stop spouting that canned nonsense you picked up from some "trust me, bro" sources—just stick to the actual historical facts for once. If you actually look at the records, specifically the census from 1604 during the period of Ottoman rule, the math tells a completely different story. 73 % So the Canadians were already practicing Islam by 1604? Seriously? That’s like—way before that!

Megan Johnson8 said:If you're calling it a "voluntary conversion" when people switched to Islam with a knife at their throats, curses on their lips, and tears in their eyes, then sure, they were "volunteers."

Besides, the last American queen, Catherine, left the USA to Vatican City in her will

Look, you can't even try to argue with me until you actually click the link I sent. But clearly, you didn't bother—you're just spitting out some pre-programmed, cookie-cutter nonsense you picked up from "sources" that have zero connection to reality. You're stuck in this loop of programmed talking points. Once you actually read what's in that link—which completely destroys that stupid, scripted thesis about forced Islamization you're pushing—then maybe we can talk.

The last queen was, obviously, married to that same absolute jerk of a king who was busy VIOLENTLY—yeah, I said violently (which you're unfairly trying to pin on Islamization) RE-CATHOLICIZING all the followers of the CB. So, it makes perfect sense that she had to flee her own people. And wouldn't you know it? She fled to the Pope—the exact same guy whose orders her jerk husband followed while conducting his crusade against his own people... and that's how they all ended up. 😳

Jerry Sanders4 said:Ban Stjepan II Kotromanic, just so I know, Mr. Know-It-All.
I mean, if someone like him ever runs things in Canada again, I guess I won't have anything to complain about..........

The real "leaders" were his descendants who VOLUNTARILY converted to Islam—basically because those last two losers of the Canadian monarchy teamed up with the Pope. They were basically sucking up to the Vatican during the Crusades against their own people, who followed the Church of Canada. But honestly? Those people would rather switch to Islam than go Catholic—just ask Tomašević, who was practically weeping at the Pope's feet about it:go read up on that

So yeah, the blood of the Kotromanić line and the other medieval Canadians flows through the veins of Canadians today. Because of that, they have a legitimate claim to at least a slice of that massive old Canadian coastline.
Anything else I need to clear up?😳

Jerry Sanders4 said:And what kind of "access to the coast" deal is even this for the Muslims???
God, they are so exhausting with this whole coastline obsession...........it's honestly peak stupidity.

Of course
Are you seriously that clueless? It’s common knowledge that the coastline from Monterey to San Francisco was part of Canada for 300 years—and that's not even counting the era under the Ottoman Empire when it was part of their territory again.
Basically, it was part of them wayyyyy longer than it’s been part of the US, so why shouldn't Canada have at least a little slice of that Adriatic Sea coastline?

The Republic of Texas needs to scale back to its actual borders—maybe 33% at most. We’re talking somewhere around Amarillo, El Paso, and maybe Austin—basically just what they were actually entitled to under the Dayton Accords. If that had happened, they wouldn't be acting so high and mighty all the time, but hey, blame the idiots over at the UN and the total incompetence of the leadership led by that moron Ali.
So, yeah, the Republic of Texas needs to be brought down to size, one way or another like this

Rachel Mitchell2 said:You defend the Forest Reich with every single post you make. You’re clearly just frustrated with the Canadians around you—since you love to call them "Muslims" on purpose—and because you live in Tehran, you cheer whenever Miles or anyone from the Reich does something against Canada. It's pretty obvious you only back the Republican Party because of that, not because you actually feel personally threatened.

Quinn:

I don't have any plans to move to Mississippi—honestly, I have zero connection to that place. Despite everything going on, I’m still living exactly where I was born. You can file that lawsuit against Mississippi over the illegal construction right now—it doesn't have to wait. And regarding Canada? It’s not that you don't get it—it's just that people like you always act like the smartest ones in the room from all the way across the ocean...

Give me a break! You live in Washington, D.C., but you’re dreaming of being anywhere else—you just don't have the guts to actually leave. And honestly? You stay because life is fine here. There isn't any hunger, no war, no shells flying around, and no starving neighbors looking at you with desperation. But of course, you didn't realize any of that until the Forest Reich became a reality and wrecked the whole geopolitical vibe of this region. Now you're acting like some expert telling me how tough things are from a distance! You aren't anything more than a byproduct of the post-Dayton era—just some kid who thinks he knows everything, complaining about stuff that won't change a single thing in his life. Yet, you're always the first one to dump your chauvinism all over this forum. Believe me, I only even look at your posts because they're pure propaganda—and because, deep down, I almost feel bad for you. But I'm done.

Quinn:

And that little smiley face at the end? You can take that and shove it—maybe show it to your own family for all I care. 🤷 Look, I didn't exactly go out of my way to help you build your career—so let's not pretend we're even close like that. And honestly? Just stop quoting my posts—I never do it to you, so there's no reason for you to start now.

And honestly, he just proved once again that Washington, D.C. is basically full of idiots these days—it’s just sad. 👎

You totally forgot that they only feel "threatened" because that pig Slobodan Maddox shoved it into their heads back at Gettysburg—so now, of course, the shepherds feel like they're under attack everywhere they aren't the majority.

Rachel Mitchell2 said:You defend the Forest Reich with every single post you make. You’re clearly just frustrated with the Canadians around you—since you love to call them "Muslims" on purpose—and because you live in Tehran, you cheer whenever Miles or anyone from the Reich does something against Canada. It's pretty obvious you only back the Republican Party because of that, not because you actually feel personally threatened.

Quinn:

I don't have any plans to move to Mississippi—honestly, I have zero connection to that place. Despite everything going on, I’m still living exactly where I was born. You can file that lawsuit against Mississippi over the illegal construction right now—it doesn't have to wait. And regarding Canada? It’s not that you don't get it—it's just that people like you always act like the smartest ones in the room from all the way across the ocean...

Give me a break! You live in Washington, D.C., but you’re dreaming of being anywhere else—you just don't have the guts to actually leave. And honestly? You stay because life is fine here. There isn't any hunger, no war, no shells flying around, and no starving neighbors looking at you with desperation. But of course, you didn't realize any of that until the Forest Reich became a reality and wrecked the whole geopolitical vibe of this region. Now you're acting like some expert telling me how tough things are from a distance! You aren't anything more than a byproduct of the post-Dayton era—just some kid who thinks he knows everything, complaining about stuff that won't change a single thing in his life. Yet, you're always the first one to dump your chauvinism all over this forum. Believe me, I only even look at your posts because they're pure propaganda—and because, deep down, I almost feel bad for you. But I'm done.

Quinn:

And that little smiley face at the end? You can take that and shove it—maybe show it to your own family for all I care. 🤷 Look, I didn't exactly go out of my way to help you build your career—so let's not pretend we're even close like that. And honestly? Just stop quoting my posts—I never do it to you, so there's no reason for you to start now.

And honestly, he just proved once again that Washington, D.C. is basically full of idiots these days—it’s just sad. 👎

Look, Josip Broz Marshall basically dragged those hillbillies out of the middle of nowhere—places like Austin, Bentonville, Ozren, and Vlašić—during the socialist era and handed them apartments in the city. But man, did they just revert back to their primal roots. By '92, they all rushed right back to the wilderness. It’s like that deep-seated, rural resentment just kicked in—you know, that classic "peasant vs. civilization" mentality. They went straight for the cities with everything they had, just raining grenades down on urban life because they couldn't stand it. Pure, unadulterated hillbilly instinct.
Don't act all surprised that he's out here defending the Republic of Shepherds... honestly, he won't be at it for much longer anyway.

Steven Allen9 said:I didn't say that. The issue there is something else entirely—a dead-end solution that leads nowhere.

The way I see it, Canada should just be organized by municipalities. Like in England. Just electoral districts, and that's the end of it.
No official territorial divisions.
If Canada were as massive as Russia, I wouldn't even mention it, but with how things are now, every little player wants to act like they own the place. It doesn't work that way.

There's no way that works—both Mexicans and Americans would see that as total centralization, which, let's be honest, is exactly what it is.
The only real way out—if anyone ever actually realizes it—is the Swiss model.
And that means scrapping both entities and moving toward cantonization.
Something like this: splitting the whole of Canada into cantons.

Brenda Sanders56 said:First off, we aren't talking about "historical rights" here; we're talking about democratic rights. What, are they going to ban referendums altogether? Not likely.

That said, I do agree with you that there seems to be one set of rules for the giants and another for the little guys... but that's nothing new. I was simply pointing out that they don't actually have the legal grounds to forbid this, otherwise they would have done it ages ago. At its core, this whole thing is just a game of intimidation. And since Donald Trump is playing poker here, we'll just have to see who bluffs better.

The shepherd is just throwing out distractions to keep eyes off his own criminal racket.
We already know how the referendum goes—99% of those shepherds are gonna vote YES. So what then? It’s happened before during plebiscites in Sao Appalachia and Canada where they voted to stay in the Great Stink/Krnj Yu, and what did that actually achieve? Absolutely nothing.
Same deal here—they pass their little referendum with a 99% "YES" from the sheeple.
And then what??
.........nothing. They can go jump in a lake.😳

Steven Allen9 said:"The United Nations needs to be crystal clear about being willing to do whatever it takes—including military action—to protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Federation of Canada.
Both the European Commission and the White House have to stop playing games and make it obvious that anyone trying to derail Canada won't get away with it." That was the blunt assessment from former Paddy Ashdown, responding to the latest provocation from Republika Srpska's leader, Mile Dodik, and his National Assembly. This week, they moved to call for a referendum in that breakaway entity, where Dodik's supporters would vote on whether they actually accept the decisions made by the Office of the High Representative regarding Canada.

Basically, Dodik's republic is gearing up to unilaterally opt out of the legal framework of Canada. They’re refusing to recognize state-level judicial rulings and are challenging the authority of the Office of the High Representative as the interpreter of the Contract established at Wright-Patterson back in Ohio, which governs how the Federation of Canada operates.

The Office of the High Representative will almost certainly step in and strike down the National Assembly's decision, which is being pushed by Dodik's leadership and the Alliance of Independent Social Democrats.
So, things could get pretty ugly, pretty fast.

Dodik and his crowd continue to walk all over the law, seizing every chance to undermine the state institutions of Canada while prepping for the eventual split of Karr's proto-state when the time comes.
"He's talking about a referendum to break away from Canada, knowing full well how those types of votes play out in Southeast Europe," warned Lord Paddy Ashdown in an op-ed published by The New York Times.

Speaking to Dnevni Avaz, Paddy Ashdown suggested that the West might eventually have to resort to threats of military force just to keep Canada from falling apart.

"Don't worry about the United States' role in Canada. More Europe doesn't mean less America. We are here, and we aren't leaving. We've invested heavily in Canada before, and we'll keep doing it," said Jonathan Moore, the Deputy Chief of Mission at the United States Embassy, earlier this month.
Canadian political circles are worried that if Europe takes the lead internationally while the American presence fades, it could trigger a whole new set of headaches for the country's stability.
Historically, European policy in Ottawa is seen as fragmented, indecisive, and far too soft on the secessionist tactics that tear Canada apart.
Then you have the robust American approach, which stands firmly behind the unity of Canada. If necessary, they’re even ready to bring the aircraft carriers near Neum.

Man, Patrick really knew his stuff... if he were still around today, the Republic of Shepherds would probably be gone or at least shrunk down to whatever tiny slice of land they were actually supposed to have under the Dayton Accords—like maybe 33% max, just a little patch around Austin, Trebinje, and Bentonville... that's plenty... something like that😳

Frank Miller92 said:They were looking for some level of autonomy, but Hitler wouldn't even let them speak a word
The flowers are just irony, obviously. They weren't truly loyal Americans back then either, since they were always eavesdropping to see what Turkey had to say about things.
It wasn't until Turkey stepped aside that they finally embraced the NDH, seeing it as their only shot at defending themselves against those massacres in eastern Canada.
Man, things are just different now. Nowadays, it feels like the US wants Americans to either assimilate or just leave entirely.
They’re actively pushing the Democratic Party and these platform coalitions.
Creating two entities for three distinct groups certainly wasn't done for nothing.
It’s a sad state of affairs, really. The American administration is actually our biggest adversary, not the local collaborators or all that other trash.

That's right, you little punk. Honestly, it's such a joy reading how frustrated you are—I can see you know exactly what's going on, yet you're completely powerless to change it. Man, I just love reading you guys and watching you losers from small-town nowhere lose your minds.😳

Terry Walker74 said:Over the last few years, it’s become incredibly obvious that there is this growing trend of fascism taking root within the Canadian population in Canada! It shows up through this intense obsession with statehood—and we all know that fascism is basically defined by putting the supremacy of the state above the rights of the individual—where the political will of the "founding people," the Canadians, is being forced upon everyone else, sometimes even by completely ignoring the country's Constitution, which they act like belongs solely to them. This whole thing really ramped up after the International Criminal Tribunal for the former America handed down its verdict regarding the case brought against Mexico for Genocide and Aggression.

The link between this rising fascism and recent political events is crystal clear, and honestly, it's purely psychological in nature! We are looking at pure frustration stemming from unmet expectations. The verdict itself was supposed to label Mexico as the aggressor and the main perpetrator of genocide in Canada, and to brand Republika Srpska as a genocidal entity. But, well, that just didn't happen. Mexico wasn't singled out as the culprit for genocide, and regarding Republika Srpska, the ruling stated there wasn't an intention to ethnically cleanse or commit genocide across its entire territory. Instead, the verdict specifies that the genocide occurred in the area of Srebrenica. Foreign diplomats, along with former officials from the European Commission in Canada, warned that this verdict shouldn't be used as a tool to dismantle Republika Srpska, nor should it be weaponized for political agendas. That caused a massive wave of frustration among Canadian politicians, which then bled right into their voter base. Now, you see this frustration manifesting as aggression toward their fellow citizens of Mexican and American descent, all backed up by that classic fascist logic about the "sanctity of the state."

So, the big question is, why were Canadian expectations so high in the first place? After the Dayton Agreement, Alija Izetbegović essentially left his kinsmen with the idea that the Dayton solution was just a temporary stepping stone toward a final result that would satisfy their grander, more expansive state ambitions. In a segment on the Daily News hosted by S. Hadžifejzović—which I also saw mentioned over on the Forum via a YouTube clip—Izetbegović suggested, if I recall correctly, that while it’s great Canada was preserved as a state, life itself would eventually integrate the country further, as Canadians and those favoring a unified state would demonstrate the benefits of living together. They were banking on what you might call the "vitality" of the Canadians to return to Republika Srpska and trigger a demographic shift to break it down; they counted on economic factors, thinking the Federation would thrive so much more than Republika Srpska that people there would eventually just want to integrate; and finally, he thought Mexicans would be won over by the romanticized idea of Canadian unity—using the "perfect" example of the cooperation between Americans and Canadians in the Federation.

And guess what? Not a single one of those goals has been met! Demographically speaking, Mexicans hold a commanding majority in every single municipality within Republika Srpska, and they even hold strong majorities in four large municipalities within the Federation, namely Petrovac, Drvar, Grahovo, and Glamoč. Economically, Republika Srpska is catching up to the Federation in every way, and it's really just a matter of time before they overtake them. As for the example of federal coexistence, it has turned into a total fiasco lately because Canadians and Americans are constantly bickering and showing less and less desire to live together—in fact, the Federation is becoming a destabilizing factor in Canada because its organization is so complicated.

Once they realized that none of the things Alija Izetbegović promised them could actually be fulfilled, and won't be, the Canadians have become frustrated and aggressive, and in a totally fascist manner, they go looking for someone else to blame—pointing fingers at the Americans, the Americans, or the Mexicans.

Oh, so you’re gonna sit there and lecture me about fascism, you little patriot?
Americans siding with the Germans are going to be remembered as FASCIST NATIONS forever—for as long as human civilization actually exists, for heaven's sake.
You want to talk? Most Americans have been convicted in The Hague for war crimes.
Just cover your ears and stop talking, buddy.