CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › dustyorca3 › Posts

Posts by dustyorca3

2 posts shown.

Harold James9 said:No. While individual tragedies will certainly rise as more people fall into the trap you're describing, we won't see any global catastrophes. Human nature and the world are driven by entirely different forces.

To get straight to the point, listen to Zvonko Bogdan:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4DAJ...eature=related

🙂🙂🙂

And what exactly is that force? Is it just greed—that "I have to own everything" mentality?
There's a difference between sustainable and unsustainable growth. If we keep this up, we’ll consume the entire planet like a worm eating through an apple. Then it’s over. This constant wastefulness just accelerates the decay; it doesn't spark any creative energy needed to find a solution or grow a new apple.
Space is vast. It could theoretically handle all our excess, provided that excess doesn't reach cosmic proportions.
But we actually have to get to space first. And it's hard to launch a rocket when everyone is too busy getting drunk and chasing lust + energy.
Ronald Rogers27 said:Lust + energy, combined with entertainment + ideal of abundance = a fake sense of prosperity. It’s an illusion, and it’s heading straight for a global disaster.

YES or NO? Tell me why.

Ronald Rogers27

All three can be boiled down to one common denominator: WASTE.

Waste means burning through our natural resources just to satisfy whims. Beyond feeding our own flaws, it actively destroys nature.

As Gandhi once said:
The country has enough for everyone's needs, but not for everyone's greed.
Simply put: there isn't enough for everyone, nor is it possible to satisfy every human whim, so we shouldn't feed them. All three are ultimately hollow impulses. They come at the expense of the common good.

One could argue they are the perfect definition of evil.