Dealing with a problematic guy, help...
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Drew Allen2 said:Lately, the moderator/admin The Observer has been throwing full support behind that guy who keeps crawling back to this forum. Now I see why he isn't getting banned faster—it's because he has protection from the top.
He recently popped back up using some handle like "Mike Ronhill" or whatever. I actually asked him on the forum, "Charles XVI, is that you?" and The Observer slapped me with a penalty for even asking. It’s blindingly obvious the guy has backing from certain people in administration. I report him every single time I spot him, yet nobody does anything, and he just stays here promoting his own site. So now it's clear: The Observer ignores the reports because this guy is probably his buddy or something. Every time I point out that Charles XVI is being problematic again, I'm the one who gets punished. This is a disgusting abuse of power.
26.08.2012., 12:37 ,
Charles XVI is back, spamming links to his own forum.
The real question is why The Observer gives him a free pass while refusing to let me post my high-quality maps of American townships based on census data.
Everyone knows The Observer is a total sleazebag. People steer clear of him like a pothole on a highway. As for why they keep him around... you'd have to ask Anderlon. He's definitely driven a lot of people away with how he acts.