2 posts shown.
Steven Reed said:uhm 🤔
Are you actually creditworthy enough to qualify for this loan on your own? If so—and if you can pull it off—just add a co-signer as a guarantor and that should clear up your headache. 🤔
Regarding the assignment of your current life insurance policy: you’ll get that money once the policy expires (subject to the fine print) or when the loan is paid off—since the policy essentially acts as collateral for the loan. As long as you stay current on your payments, the bank won't touch the policy; they only trigger a claim if you default on the loan.
Thanks for the response! I actually already have the first part of my loan with this bank; now I'm looking to take out the second portion, which is why I need a co-signer—I don't think they can serve as a simple guarantor since I don't meet the credit requirements on my own. Now, a bit of a silly question: even with the bank holding a lien, is there any way I could access those funds early if an emergency comes up?
The loan will be set for 30 years, and I've already been paying into the life insurance for 10. There has to be a way—surely—that once the home value increases in a few years, I can resolve that lien on the insurance... at least, that's how my logic works.
I’m looking to take out a $30,000 mortgage through JPMorgan Chase—specifically to finish up some construction on my current property—but I’ve hit a bit of a snag. The issue is that the property appraisal came back lower than the amount I’m actually asking for from the bank. To make matters more complicated, I have a co-signer who will be setting up life insurance, but I don't have any additional collateral or other real estate to offer. As a way to provide extra security, the bank is insisting that I use the existing life insurance policy I’ve been paying into for the last 10 years. They told me that once this new insurance contract expires in 10 years, I’ll essentially get those funds back—but I’m really questioning if there’s any logic to this. I can't help but wonder if I'll run into trouble trying to recover what I've paid, especially since I'll likely be paying into this for another decade. This policy was supposed to be my "rainy day fund"—because, let's face it, nothing in this country is ever truly certain—so if I hit a rough patch financially, I could always tap into those funds. But if I assign the policy to the bank, that money is effectively locked away for the next 10 years... and honestly, I’m worried I might not even see it after that....
Should I just move on to a different bank, or am I basically shackling myself for life here? In my experience, most banks operate pretty much the same way anyway... I'm terrified that if I switch, I'll just run into the exact same wall, which would be a massive waste of time.
I know I might not have explained all of this perfectly—I haven't slept a wink all night because these numbers are just spinning in my head... If anyone has dealt with something similar, please, I need your perspective.... any advice at all would be appreciated.