To understand our current political and economic landscape, you have to look at the bigger
picture if you want to figure out how much room this or any future
Cabinet actually has to move.
It’s pretty obvious that under our current system of PRIVATE
OWNERSHIP—where a capitalist, whether they like it or not, owns their
assets, their means of production, and essentially rents labor—there is a built-in
flaw. By owning things, they gain power over those very things, especially when
they distance themselves from the Federal Government.
Basically, the government ends up disarming itself. It can't claim total
authority over the entire National Territory because private
property rights are untouchable.
Clearly, we can only discuss what a new or old administration can do
within its own backyard—essentially within a perimeter it sets for itself. And that
perimeter is shrinking every single day. These shifts are just a shell game:
plug one hole by opening
another, then realize that second hole is fresh and wonder if you need a third one to plug it, and so on.
If the government wants to jumpstart the economy, the only way forward is to step up
as an investor in new companies to secure those 150,000+ new jobs.
We can't just sit around waiting for foreign investors; we're out of time.
The opportunities are endless: the automotive industry and all its
sub-sectors, electronics, appliances, IT, heavy manufacturing, defense,
and so on.
But does this mean the Cabinet is acting against its own principles? The idea is that the State
is a terrible economic manager, so what would it even do with massive corporations?
Following the usual systemic inertia, it would probably just end up selling them off again
because they eventually become competition for the capitalists. So, what now? How do we move forward?
The line has to be drawn clearly: there must be a boundary between the interests of the
Federal Government and private interest.
picture if you want to figure out how much room this or any future
Cabinet actually has to move.
It’s pretty obvious that under our current system of PRIVATE
OWNERSHIP—where a capitalist, whether they like it or not, owns their
assets, their means of production, and essentially rents labor—there is a built-in
flaw. By owning things, they gain power over those very things, especially when
they distance themselves from the Federal Government.
Basically, the government ends up disarming itself. It can't claim total
authority over the entire National Territory because private
property rights are untouchable.
Clearly, we can only discuss what a new or old administration can do
within its own backyard—essentially within a perimeter it sets for itself. And that
perimeter is shrinking every single day. These shifts are just a shell game:
plug one hole by opening
another, then realize that second hole is fresh and wonder if you need a third one to plug it, and so on.
If the government wants to jumpstart the economy, the only way forward is to step up
as an investor in new companies to secure those 150,000+ new jobs.
We can't just sit around waiting for foreign investors; we're out of time.
The opportunities are endless: the automotive industry and all its
sub-sectors, electronics, appliances, IT, heavy manufacturing, defense,
and so on.
But does this mean the Cabinet is acting against its own principles? The idea is that the State
is a terrible economic manager, so what would it even do with massive corporations?
Following the usual systemic inertia, it would probably just end up selling them off again
because they eventually become competition for the capitalists. So, what now? How do we move forward?
The line has to be drawn clearly: there must be a boundary between the interests of the
Federal Government and private interest.