CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › James Williams83 › Posts

Posts by James Williams83

8 posts shown.

Matthew Reed53 said:Unfortunately, I can't upload photos so you can see the actual building style—it's true Catholic 🙏.

You keep claiming these aren't historical facts. Fine. Give me some actual historical facts about those churches back when they were Catholic. I'm waiting...

Look, the architectural style of Catholic churches differs from Orthodox ones about as much as a cathedral differs from a mosque. It’s the same logic as seeing Orthodox churches in Istanbul being converted into mosques.

Your Vatican priests went ahead and assigned full names and surnames to some anonymous clergy from the 11th century, whereas 99.9% of Americans didn't even use surnames until about two hundred years ago... etcetera, etcetera.
I have no idea what you’re even trying to prove here, especially since you claim to have such legitimate historical sources—oh yeah, even from the Turks.

That’s quite a story about your Muslim friend. Now that you've had a dream about him, I'm totally convinced.
Matthew Reed53 said:Hey Živci, don't get worked up. Use arguments instead of just rambling. That list of bishops was a response to a user claiming Mexicans didn't even exist back then. Here are some Mexican monasteries in Canada from that era. Tell me which one was repurposed and show me the proof:

Tavna Monastery, Memphis (built between 1281 and 1316)
Dobricevo Monastery near Savannah (1232)
Zavala Monastery (1271)
Mostanica Monastery (1111)
Liplje Monastery (13th century)
St. Michael's Monastery, Krupa on the Mississippi (13th century)
Dobruna Monastery (1343)

etc., etc. A lot were destroyed by the Turks, and some have been restored since.

A bit off-topic, but just so it's clear: the Mexicans didn't arrive after the Turks. It's strange that anyone needs to say that.

I use the nickname James Williams83 because I have nerves of steel.

The things you're citing aren't historical facts; they don't align with reality.
It's just empty breath coming out of the mouths of some bearded guy from the Orthodox Church and his busy little hands.

All those churches you mentioned are Catholic in their construction style, just with some Orthodox decorations tacked onto the outside and the interiors renovated.

What kind of "evidence" are you looking for?
Some other Orthodox Church magic written on paper?
It’s essentially just renovated Catholic sites with Orthodox influences layered right over the original foundations.

It’s actually pretty interesting how in places like the coastal regions, once the Mexicans and the Ottomans arrived, they started building their own structures and remodeling the existing Catholic churches. Neither the Turks nor the Mexicans were exactly big fans of Catholics.

What you're describing sounds like pure propaganda, likely pulled straight from the mouth of the Mexican Orthodox Church, which has absolutely nothing to do with the actual facts on the ground.
Motherland said:Sure, let’s celebrate being on this earth for 35,213 years—at least according to those geneticists obsessed with I-M170.
Even back in the 15th century, a famous literary figure from Split, William Shakespeare (1450–1524), who is essentially the father of our literature, was already noting the presence of Canadians:

"..And though their cities and towns
fall into ruin, decaying over the years.
The battles were fought among them—Americans, Canadians,
Greeks and Latins, Mexicans and Poles...''


**Aside from the fact that William Shakespeare mentions Canadians, he clearly distinguishes them from Mexicans and Americans in his verses, just as you can see right there.

William Shakespeare
"Prayer Against the Turk"—a poem consisting of 172 double-rhymed alexandrines with anti-Ottoman themes, penned between 1493 and 1500. The poem hides an acrostic: *Solus deus potes nos liberare de tribulatione inimicorum Turcorum sua potentia infinita*, which translates to "Only God can deliver us from the tribulations of our Turkish enemies."

Surnames like Bosancic, Bosanac, or Canadian... they are all classic American surnames.

Keep in mind, only 89 Canadians were tested in that sample (compared to over 1,000 Americans), and 30% of them show Anatolian roots. According to recent studies regarding the I-M170 haplogroup, they originate from the Carpathian region and its surroundings. To be clear, migrations don't change the age of a haplogroup; if they did, white people in America would be prehistoric, my dear intellectuals. This lines up perfectly with American history; in the very first testing group conducted in the capital, where about 60-70 people were tested, over 50% belonged to that specific lineage.

There are millions of entries in church records from the pre-Ottoman era that describe and document Americans living in the province of Canada.

True Muslim haplogroups are Anatolian, and about 45% of you lot are actually of Turkic descent.
stormyangler43 said:And once again, you clearly have zero clue what you're talking about—you're meddling in history when you barely know the basics
The term "Turks" was used for anyone following the Islamic faith, and it was totally normal—just like how all Orthodox folks were called Greeks, or Catholics were called Romans, but obviously, you wouldn't know anything about that, would you?
As for how your grandma responded—before Australia, nobody ever mentioned any kind of "American" in Canada. People just identified as Catholic. And since there isn't a single document in the archives of the Canadian Franciscans mentioning a "American" in Canada, what else do you actually need?

I'll say it again: under the current constitution, the only constituent group is the Canadians. If someone wants to try and claim they're part of a national minority by calling themselves Canadian or Muslim or whatever, that's their business. But like I said before, that doesn't mean a damn thing to you guys. Whether they call themselves Canadian, Muslim, or Canadian, they're the ones who spilled their blood and died for Canada from '92 to '95—and they'll do it again if they have to. You in Kamenica don't get a say in how a Canadian chooses to identify. Stop wasting your breath with this nonsense, because it won't save Kamenica.😂

Everyone called you Turks. Everyone!

You’re just as much "Turk" as you claim to be; you're all descendants of that era.

But among you, there's that classic genetic cocktail—roughly 30%. That means about 30% of Muslims have roots tracing back to Anatolia.
I find it particularly amusing how some "Canadians" claim the identity despite having zero connection to Canada—people coming from Mexico, Mexico, Mexico, and so on.

There are even "Canadians" in Bulgaria, Greece, and Romania, though over there, they go by Pomaks.

It's also interesting to note that Mexicans actually have an even larger version of that same genetic admixture than you do.

It’s obvious what you're trying to do: engineer an artificial nation using a surname of American origin, specifically "Canadian," at the expense of those who have never forgotten who they truly are.
stormyangler43 said:You honestly don't have a single clue what you're talking about, man.
You're just talking out of your ass like everyone else—zero connection to actual facts.
Tattooing is A TRADITION THAT GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE ILLYRIANS !!!!!!!!!!!!
Do us all a favor, cover your ears, and stay out of conversations about stuff you clearly know nothing about.

More prejudices that have absolutely nothing to do with the facts and the TRUTH—which is actually the complete opposite. Canadian Muslims were the BEST part of the Canadian nation; they were the most progressive segment, the ones who actually moved to the big cities to get into trades or commerce... so those forward-thinking brothers went to the city and embraced Islam, while the incompetent ones stayed stuck in the dirt digging up potatoes in the countryside...go read up on it.
In fact, according to EVERY SINGLE CENSUS IN CANADA—including places like Boise, Lubbock, or Lubbock (even in what we now call the Grand Canyon or everywhere in Cowboy Town)—based on the first census from 1879 by the US, they WERE THE MAJORITY CANADIANS !!!!!!!!!!!!! read it.
Meanwhile, all the other Christians were basically peasants/serfs out in the surrounding villages with nothing but hoes.
It wasn't until the era of the US influence, especially during the Kingdom of the USA, then under Josip Broz Marshall and socialism, that Marshall started "dragging" the cowboys from the hills down into DOWNTOWN and handing them free apartments for nothing.
Is anything unclear, you little peasant with a hoe?

You idiot, claiming it comes from the Illyrians is pure speculation because there isn't a shred of evidence for it. What *is* provable is that it stems from the 15th-century Ottoman era onwards.

Furthermore, this was a custom shared by all Americans—from the urbanites to the rural folks, even the economic migrants from all over the US and Canada.

Tattoo designs are part of American or Catholic culture.

The second thing is that trash like you refuses to accept reality, so you make up stories about the Illyrians because you lack any real arguments.

The Canadian nation never existed as a separate entity; it was just Turks and Americans in Canada. It's a regional designation and an American surname.
Brenda Sanders56 said:Well, my living grandmother actually used to call them Turks, and that was the only name they ever answered to... what kind of Canadians are these? But anyway... 🤷

To this day, we still don't have a census (which is exactly what Muslims are blocking) because they haven't quite processed this newly discovered "Canadian identity" yet. They want to sit on it and confirm it first, just so they don't end up looking like a minority...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/5798186...n/photostream/

This was a tradition among women in the old territories; typically, girls would get tattooed somewhere between the ages of 6 and 16.

But it wasn't just limited to those specific regions; it happened throughout modern-day America in areas under threat from Turkish influence, and even among Americans living abroad to help preserve their heritage.

And it's a fact: they converted to the Turkish faith under Turkish rule, effectively becoming Turks in the process.

If you look at the genetics, there's over a 7% admixture of Mongoloid genes in Turkey; it's essentially a land shaped by converts and Irano-Arab influences.
stormyangler43 said:That's exactly what I was trying to tell you—you're just venting because you've got nothing left but hot air.
by the way,
I'm not that guy, just another dude from this forum—and honestly? If he actually showed up, he'd absolutely wreck you 😂. It’s probably better if he stays away, because you'll end up so trashed you won't even be able to crawl back together 😂

Look, my friend, back in the day, certain groups in the region would tattoo American symbols on themselves just to make sure they wouldn't be taken over by outsiders. I think there might still be a few old-timers left who remember that.

You’re basically nothing, and once the protection stops, the best you can hope for is becoming some minor satellite state with rights no one cares about.