CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Robert Gomez6 › Posts

Posts by Robert Gomez6

8 posts shown.

I was sitting in a coffee shop the other day, just watching people go about their business, when I saw a guy walk past who looked almost exactly like an old coworker of mine from about a decade ago. It wasn't him, obviously, but the resemblance was uncanny. It hit me with this weird, sudden wave of nostalgia mixed with a heavy sense of how much time had actually passed. It made me think about how we measure the "seasons" of our lives.

We always talk about "moving on" as if it's this clean, surgical procedure. We think we close a chapter, turn the page, and the previous text just fades into the background. But in reality, those chapters never really close; they just overlap. You carry the people you used to know, the places you used to work, and the versions of yourself that no longer exist, all into the new rooms you walk into.

I've been thinking a lot about that specific moment when a person's past and present collide in a way that feels both inevitable and totally jarring. It’s that intersection where you aren't just a visitor in your old world, but you aren't quite the same person who lived there originally, either. There’s a strange tension in that. On one hand, there's the comfort of familiarity—the shared jokes, the unspoken understandings with people who "get" your history. On the other hand, there's this quiet, creeping realization that while the setting might look the same, the players have changed, the stakes have shifted, and the dynamic is fundamentally different now.

It’s like when you go back to your hometown after years of living in a big city. You walk down the same street, see the same old landmarks, and maybe even run into someone you used to grab lunch with every Friday. For a split second, you feel like that old version of yourself. But then you realize you're looking at them through a completely different lens. You're an outsider looking in, even if you're standing right in the middle of the circle.

I wonder if we ever truly "graduate" from our previous iterations. Even when we achieve success or move into higher tiers of whatever we do—whether it's a career, a sport, or just a stage of life—that old connection remains a tether. There is something profoundly human about those moments of reconnection, where the old guard meets the new reality. It’s a test of how much we’ve grown and how much of our old selves we’ve had to shed to get where we are.

Sometimes these encounters feel like a celebration of continuity, a way to honor where we came from. Other times, they feel like a confrontation with the passage of time. It can be awkward, or it can be deeply moving. It’s that "ghost of Christmas past" feeling, but without the supernatural element. Just the raw, unvarnished reality of human transition.

I think we often try to avoid these moments because they force us to confront our own evolution. It’s easier to stay in the "now" and keep pushing forward without looking back. But if we never look back, do we lose the context of who we are? Do we become people who exist only in the present, with no roots to hold us steady when things get shaky?

I'm curious to hear what you all think about this. Do you find that revisiting your past—whether through people, places, or even old hobbies—helps you understand your present self better, or does it just create a sense of friction and "what ifs"?
Criminal profiling: What makes them tick? in Psychology ·
dustyranger64 said:That’s the fourth question, and man, it’s a total pivot from the first three.
Sure, you could take a psychological approach, but honestly, it feels a bit disconnected from our main topic. At this point, the subject becomes the driver. We aren't talking about biological predispositions or sociological environments anymore—that's what the whole theme is about. Now, it's just a direct motive.
Even "temporary insanity" doesn't really fit here if we're talking about someone who obsessively organizes and plans their vengeance over a long period before executing it.
The situation is triggered by a massive, direct stressor. It’s pure, extreme rage combined with a thirst for revenge and probably a complete disregard for self-preservation. Total no-brainer. 🤷

👍
Criminal profiling: What makes them tick? in Psychology ·
dustyranger64 said:Maybe it's because those questions feel more like legal or philosophical puzzles rather than psychological ones?

When we talk about a man whose family was slaughtered by some psychopath—someone surviving unimaginable trauma only to obsess over and eventually execute revenge—are we looking at it through a philosophical lens or a psychological one?... In this instance, I'm betting on the soul...
Criminal profiling: What makes them tick? in Psychology ·
Steven Allen9 said:Not sure why, but this reminds me of an old saying:
"The fool doesn't notice the fool, but the smart guy pays the price."

First you start an incredibly grateful thread for some reason, and then we end up playing a game of word association... I put three questions in my post that you can answer or not... sometimes it's actually good to hear someone's opinion... as for the folk jokes, we can do that another time... we're young and healthy, we have plenty of time...
Criminal profiling: What makes them tick? in Psychology ·
Sandra Barrett4 said:Women can't be criminals, essentially, since we don't have a Y chromosome at all.

That was just a passing thought, a possible reason... nothing more...
Criminal profiling: What makes them tick? in Psychology ·
Pardon, I meant an EXTRA Y chromosome...
Criminal profiling: What makes them tick? in Psychology ·
rustyraven8 said:So, what actually constitutes a crime? Are we talking about a gas station robbery or a brutal murder involving thirty stab wounds? 🤷 In my view, these initial offenses are simply reflections of pure lack of discipline, laziness, and a total absence of morality—not necessarily the result of a broken mind.🤷

Even a total psychopath or a sadist could walk into a gas station just to feed on someone else's fear... you can never truly know...
Criminal profiling: What makes them tick? in Psychology ·
Steven Allen9 said:Is there actually a genetic blueprint that makes someone a born criminal, or is it all just shaped by their early years?

Isn't it obvious when you look at these people? You can practically see the criminality written all over their faces, or am I just falling for the media hype?

The way I see it, criminals come from three main roots:
-revenge
-genetics
-childhood trauma

When it comes to crime, people start throwing out endless questions... Most of what you said is spot on, but I’m looking at it from a different angle. How much of a crime is it when one criminal takes out another? Or rather, how useful can a crime actually be? What about killing out of sheer fear or desperation? And what about politicians who sign a piece of paper and effectively wipe out hundreds or thousands of lives without a second thought, walking away completely unscathed? ... As for genetics, there's that Y chromosome factor, where the owner is basically hardwired for aggression from a young age, eventually leading them straight into a life of crime.